You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#51. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,535
Reputation Power: 134
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 14, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,535
Reputation Power: 134
Holy crap <3<3<3<3
I would love u
I would love u
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#52. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 23, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,378
Reputation Power: 60
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 23, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,378
Reputation Power: 60
very good theory i will try to find out
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#53. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,697
Reputation Power: 82
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,697
Reputation Power: 82
TTGxL96SNIPES wrote Qouted from fragtastic. I was trying to figure out how to get this to work this is just a theory on how it may work. No gurantee.
We all know the Nand is built up of different sections, Which are modified by the rebooter. I have been told the method used.
WireShark (Or any type of Packet Sniffer)
and a Unbanned Jtag
Well there is a section of the Nand callled "secdata" which is believed to send the information of the Jtag/360 to MS. If you could capture that packet and stop it from sending to MS you could in theory not be flagged and be "unbannable" here is a picture
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Now you might be saying, "OH BUT JESTER GOT BANNED" He screwed up on accident? However, His method did get patched so MS most likely changed were the NAND send the information to MS. If we could find out what section that is we can get online and be "unbannable". However, I am not sure if this information is correct but I did receive it from a trusted source. I know nothing about rebooter's and if we had a source, I could most likely find out were. Like I said I have no proof if the info is legit, it's just a theory to start off of. Good Day =D
Don't start teh flame warz pl0x. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
Looks Legit And Likes Its Gonna Work.. Good Theory
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#54. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,954
Reputation Power: 131
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,954
Reputation Power: 131
Well if this was figured out wouldn't they know and patch it ?
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#55. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,137
Reputation Power: 76
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,137
Reputation Power: 76
i dont zondrinato realease it to the publicbut heshouldrelease it to trusted sellers and people we know wouldnt release it so it doesnt get patched sothenwe would have around 20 hosters that can host all night and they wouldnt need to buy kvs anyone else agree with me?
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#56. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,002
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,002
Reputation Power: 41
it would be a long process but you should catch the packets on a retail and on a jtag and find something you think is what sets off the red light for m$ and then look at the retail version and see if it is the same because if it is it isnt what does it and keep going til you find one that is different.
and to the guy who said they wont release a new dash if jtags are unbanable m$ will because it can be the same dash just with the patch doesnt have to be any major changes.
and to the guy who said they wont release a new dash if jtags are unbanable m$ will because it can be the same dash just with the patch doesnt have to be any major changes.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#57. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 291
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 291
Reputation Power: 16
this is an amazing idea/find, but unfortunate you posted it. IF this theory is true then we have a lead, but Microsoft being the scrubs they are, MAY have seen this post. IF your idea works then microsoft will be working franticaly to hide that S*** deep. Possibly making it untraceable.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#58. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 25, 201013Year Member
Posts: 433
Reputation Power: 18
really good ideas here, we should definitely look into this more deeply
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#59. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 200915Year Member
Posts: 9,687
Reputation Power: 451
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 12, 200915Year Member
Posts: 9,687
Reputation Power: 451
TTG_GawLey wrote you are freaking jesus man, if you get this to work you will be my idol.
hell yea mine to!
i hoep to see someone try
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#60. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,944
Reputation Power: 77
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,944
Reputation Power: 77
good luck bro. hope you get it working
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.