You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
Joyful-
  • Supporter
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,616
Reputation Power: 127
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 18, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,616
Reputation Power: 127
I honestly don't know , but I hope we get a cure for cancer, it would save so many lives. we are on gov health care, so they would be losing money, I personally don't think they have a cure for cancer.


Last edited by Joyful- ; edited 1 time in total
#32. Posted:
Yui
  • Winner!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,964
Reputation Power: 154
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,964
Reputation Power: 154
I would believe this. Why? Well because money is a factor. They are in belief that if they release the cure for cancer, that eventually they would make less money from it, than if they left it a mystery.
#33. Posted:
MLG-
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 12, 20159Year Member
Posts: 384
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 12, 20159Year Member
Posts: 384
Reputation Power: 18
I'm not sure but I don't think that the government would let thousands of people die when they can save them
#34. Posted:
xXiankillerXx
  • Wise One
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 23, 201212Year Member
Posts: 541
Reputation Power: 20
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 23, 201212Year Member
Posts: 541
Reputation Power: 20
it's a possibility.
the government hides a bunch of crap nowadays that we may never know
#35. Posted:
Tywin
  • Winter 2016
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Yui wrote I would believe this. Why? Well because money is a factor. They are in belief that if they release the cure for cancer, that eventually they would make less money from it, than if they left it a mystery.


It would be next to impossible to keep a cure for cancer a secret. It would take hundreds of doctors and scientists to develop such a thing and at least one of them would have a conscience.
#36. Posted:
Aced
  • Winter 2019
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,334
Reputation Power: 1183
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,334
Reputation Power: 1183
Their deff is a cure. But honestly why would they release it. They make money osf these diseases and it helps population control think about it
Smoking cigarettes causes cancer right but its still legal. Their is a reason.
#37. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Summer 2019
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Around 7.9 million people die every year from Cancer. This number is made up again in 200 days. If this is being done to control the population then it is a redundant exercise.

Let's apply this money making logic to another scenario.

Cars: Have constant safety upgrades being added all of the time by manufacturers for many different types of cars.
Cancer: Has treatments being constantly added to ease and help patients suffering with many different types of Cancer.

Cars: Researchers behind the scenes are constantly looking for the best way to make cars safe.
Cancer: Researchers behind the scenes are constantly looking for the best way to fight Cancer.

Cars: Insurance companies make their money from the existence of crashes.
Cancer: Pharmaceutical companies make their money from the existence of Cancer [as well as other medical issues, obviously]

Cars: The researchers belong to many different institutes and are largely separate from the insurance companies.
Cancer: The researchers belong to many different institutes and are largely separate from the pharmaceutical companies.

Cars: There is no conspiracy linking the lack in massive safety innovations with money.
Cancer: There is a conspiracy linking the lack of a cure with money.

Why the inconsistency?
#38. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 03, 20159Year Member
Posts: 622
Reputation Power: 577
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 03, 20159Year Member
Posts: 622
Reputation Power: 577
You can always respond "That's what the government wants you to think" to something because who really knows.
#39. Posted:
Mazur
  • Summer 2021
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 7,024
Reputation Power: 423
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 7,024
Reputation Power: 423
There is most likely a cure for cancer, but the government or whomever has it is not going to release it as sadly there is more money to be made with chemotherapy and surgeries and whatnot than actually saving a life. sadly this is the world we live in with greedy people.
#40. Posted:
OXT
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,514
Reputation Power: 136
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,514
Reputation Power: 136
TetraHydroCannabinol could kill some cancercells as far as I know.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.