Lavish wrote

Stunned- wrote "Liberal bias"

Ever watched Fox News?

Every source is going to have a bias because every person on this Earth does. Otherwise, we wouldn't have opinions.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Yes, liberal bias.
Fox News is completely irrelevant to our conversation.
There are still credible media outlets available.
That article is from 2 months before Trump started refusing Super PACs money.

I think it's very clear he's using Fox News as a comparison to something that's actually bias oppose to an online news source that is nothing compared to Fox News. Calling it completely irrelevant is a stretch. You honestly could question the validity of almost all news sources by claiming they're bias.

Exi wrote I honestly would have preferred B/O To stay, but it's not where I live so it doesn't matter to much to me.

Nah, he's too much of a push over. he's where the polls are, just like Hilary.

Cokes wrote

Lavish wrote

Stunned- wrote "Liberal bias"

Ever watched Fox News?

Every source is going to have a bias because every person on this Earth does. Otherwise, we wouldn't have opinions.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Yes, liberal bias.
Fox News is completely irrelevant to our conversation.
There are still credible media outlets available.
That article is from 2 months before Trump started refusing Super PACs money.

I think it's very clear he's using Fox News as a comparison to something that's actually bias oppose to an online news source that is nothing compared to Fox News. Calling it completely irrelevant is a stretch. You honestly could question the validity of almost all news sources by claiming they're bias.

Exactly, I was trying to make a point through hyperbole.

MLGVizzy wrote Donald Trump, i really dont know if he'll be a good president, im pretty sure he is going to win. But i dont know if thats the kind of president our country needs, but also we cant have a female as our president, that crazy woman would destroy us!

Whats your guys opinion?

Why tf is this in conspiracy theory forum???

illestrated wrote

MLGVizzy wrote Donald Trump, i really dont know if he'll be a good president, im pretty sure he is going to win. But i dont know if thats the kind of president our country needs, but also we cant have a female as our president, that crazy woman would destroy us!

Whats your guys opinion?

Why tf is this in conspiracy theory forum???

Yeah, it seems as if this sub-forum needs a moderator.

Cokes wrote I think it's very clear he's using Fox News as a comparison to something that's actually bias oppose to an online news source that is nothing compared to Fox News. Calling it completely irrelevant is a stretch. You honestly could question the validity of almost all news sources by claiming they're bias.

A website that has publicly endorsed 44 Democrats in one election period has an obvious bias lol

Lavish wrote

Cokes wrote I think it's very clear he's using Fox News as a comparison to something that's actually bias oppose to an online news source that is nothing compared to Fox News. Calling it completely irrelevant is a stretch. You honestly could question the validity of almost all news sources by claiming they're bias.

A website that has publicly endorsed 44 Democrats in one election period has an obvious bias lol

To the extent that most news sources have some sort of bias, I wouldn't doubt it as being credible, at least compared to other news sources. As I've said before, most news outlets will have a bias.

Lavish wrote

Cokes wrote I think it's very clear he's using Fox News as a comparison to something that's actually bias oppose to an online news source that is nothing compared to Fox News. Calling it completely irrelevant is a stretch. You honestly could question the validity of almost all news sources by claiming they're bias.

A website that has publicly endorsed 44 Democrats in one election period has an obvious bias lol

Well, if you're a Democrat you're probably going to support... Democrats.

In the UK, the queen or the general public wouldn't allow a multi-billionaire to run the country. It shows he doesn't care about an equal society, and only wants the rich to become richer and the poor to become worse off.

Robbed wrote In the UK, the queen or the general public wouldn't allow a multi-billionaire to run the country. It shows he doesn't care about an equal society, and only wants the rich to become richer and the poor to become worse off.

You realize the queen has a net worth of $550 mil and is getting paid $54.8 mil per year from public funds, despite a 33% poverty rating?