You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#31. Posted:
HTTK
  • 2000 Thanks
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,496
Reputation Power: 313
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,496
Reputation Power: 313
[quote="Bhoy"]
HTTK wrote
Bhoy wrote
HTTK wrote
Yin wrote
HTTK wrote
Tricks wrote It isn't a stereotype. Pitbulls are proven to be more vicious dogs. Yes, not all are dangerous, but I disagree with the statement that it is a stereotype, when research has proven this. Plus, it probably doesn't help that it was a yorki, since they are known as petite dogs.

I am sorry that this situation even happened to you though, I am a dog owner myself and would be devastated to have mine taken away/put down.


A study doesn't show for every dog.

She was the least vicious dog ever.

Raised with 2 miniature wiener dogs and 4 kids.

She sees the kids as her kids just protecting them.

I don't think you can say it was the least vicious dog ever if it killed another dog, even if it felt like it was protecting something/someone. It apparently was vicious to some degree. Maybe the Yorkie shouldn't have been off a leash, but your dog still was a threat. It can't do that just because it thinks there is a threat. It attacked at something that wasn't a threat, so it then became a safety hazard.


Well it was a little dog.

All she did was bite it once..


And it only takes one bite to kill a child, a dog barking in it's face is the same as a kid waving it's hands and screaming.

If your dog attacks in any situation by biting, then it's vicious.

And can you please stop acting like you're the victim here, someone doesn't have their dog anymore because of this and you're complaining about a fine and having to stay in the house.


There dog was off the leash and in the road.


So what? Everybody lets their dog off their leash. It's common behaviour for dogs to treat other dogs and try to play with them.

If your dog can not do that without becoming vicious then it should have been muzzled at all times. This is not the other dogs fault at all, so once again stop acting like the victim when you're in the wrong.

Should kids be on leashes as well in your world? Because that would seem to be your excuse if your dog killed a child.

You're in the wrong here and nobody else, your dog should have been put down and I have no idea why it hasn't so you should consider yourself lucky and maybe take 10 minutes out of your day to think about the dog that is now dead and the owner who has lost their pet instead of trying to play the victim card and make everyone feel sorry for you.[/quote
You can go **** yourself. I stayed with the owner of the dog for an hour afterwards working everything out with them. They agreed that there dog should of not been loose and in the street. Even though they still blamed it on her being a pit. That's what pissed me off. If it was any other dog the same could of happened.
#32. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
HTTK wrote
Duderino wrote
HTTK wrote
Bhoy wrote
HTTK wrote
Yin wrote
HTTK wrote
Tricks wrote It isn't a stereotype. Pitbulls are proven to be more vicious dogs. Yes, not all are dangerous, but I disagree with the statement that it is a stereotype, when research has proven this. Plus, it probably doesn't help that it was a yorki, since they are known as petite dogs.

I am sorry that this situation even happened to you though, I am a dog owner myself and would be devastated to have mine taken away/put down.


A study doesn't show for every dog.

She was the least vicious dog ever.

Raised with 2 miniature wiener dogs and 4 kids.

She sees the kids as her kids just protecting them.

I don't think you can say it was the least vicious dog ever if it killed another dog, even if it felt like it was protecting something/someone. It apparently was vicious to some degree. Maybe the Yorkie shouldn't have been off a leash, but your dog still was a threat. It can't do that just because it thinks there is a threat. It attacked at something that wasn't a threat, so it then became a safety hazard.


Well it was a little dog.

All she did was bite it once..


And it only takes one bite to kill a child, a dog barking in it's face is the same as a kid waving it's hands and screaming.

If your dog attacks in any situation by biting, then it's vicious.

And can you please stop acting like you're the victim here, someone doesn't have their dog anymore because of this and you're complaining about a fine and having to stay in the house.


There dog was off the leash and in the road.


You're missing the point.
Even if a dog kills something in self defense, it is, by the standards of modern day dogs living in everyday homes, a vicious dog.
I would say that is true unless it is physically attacked first. A dog running towards it is not a physical attack.

Bhoy's analogy is valid too, if it were a child you would not be defending your dog, I hope.

If you read you would know my brother was in control of the dog.


Having control of the dog would mean that it didn't kill another dog.
If your brother truly did have control, that would mean that he made your Pit Bull kill the Yorkie.
That is what him being in control in that situation would mean.


The dog was running at my brother. Probobaly wasn't going to hurt him at all, duh.
But my dog didn't know that. She just but her once and backed off. My brother was in control of the dog as in he was holding her on the leash not that he made her attack it. If that happened do you think I would bitching about my dog being innocent? No.


Do you understand what a hypothetical situation is?
You said that your brother was in control. That means that your brother made the dog kill the other dog. That is what control means, "The power to direct or influence other people's behaviour" [in this case it's the dog obviously.]
I'm saying that your brother wasn't in control, and that you don't know what control means.

It doesn't matter if your dog bit once or twenty times. The fact that it bit at all is what matters.
That is what makes it a vicious dog.
#33. Posted:
ABB
  • Wise One
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 201410Year Member
Posts: 564
Reputation Power: 36
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 201410Year Member
Posts: 564
Reputation Power: 36
HTTK wrote
ABB wrote Lets back up here, this isn't a stereotype.

Your dog has KILLED at least two dogs from what you have said.

I love dogs, and I care for them so much.

But your dog should probably be put down.


What the hell?

Where did you get that from?


You casually said, like it meant nothing "So my pit bull killed another dog".

I have had 4 dogs, and no trained dog bites. Just because your dog felt threatened, doesn't mean its acceptable to kill a dog. A dog doesn't see a dog and immediately thinks it is going to die. No, your dog is not trained, and doesn't deserve to be walking around and killing dogs.

Stop making yourself the victim. Because you can't control your dog, someone doesn't have theirs.
#34. Posted:
HTTK
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,496
Reputation Power: 313
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,496
Reputation Power: 313
ABB wrote
HTTK wrote
ABB wrote Lets back up here, this isn't a stereotype.

Your dog has KILLED at least two dogs from what you have said.

I love dogs, and I care for them so much.

But your dog should probably be put down.


What the hell?

Where did you get that from?


You casually said, like it meant nothing "So my pit bull killed another dog".

I have had 4 dogs, and no trained dog bites. Just because your dog felt threatened, doesn't mean its acceptable to kill a dog. A dog doesn't see a dog and immediately thinks it is going to die. No, your dog is not trained, and doesn't deserve to be walking around and killing dogs.

Stop making yourself the victim. Because you can't control your dog, someone doesn't have theirs.


Killing dogs? What the hell is wrong with you people she bit 1 one dog and it resulted in a fatal injury.
#35. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Summer 2019
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
HTTK wrote
ABB wrote
HTTK wrote
ABB wrote Lets back up here, this isn't a stereotype.

Your dog has KILLED at least two dogs from what you have said.

I love dogs, and I care for them so much.

But your dog should probably be put down.


What the hell?

Where did you get that from?


You casually said, like it meant nothing "So my pit bull killed another dog".

I have had 4 dogs, and no trained dog bites. Just because your dog felt threatened, doesn't mean its acceptable to kill a dog. A dog doesn't see a dog and immediately thinks it is going to die. No, your dog is not trained, and doesn't deserve to be walking around and killing dogs.

Stop making yourself the victim. Because you can't control your dog, someone doesn't have theirs.


Killing dogs? What the hell is wrong with you people she bit 1 one dog and it resulted in a fatal injury.


You do say in the first line of your post 'So my pit killed another dog.'
'Another' means there was at least one before.

Don't blame him for your writing errors.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.