Lavish wrote

KyloCrux wrote Because he isn't right? All of these Syrians Nobama is letting in, how do we know there aren't ISIS spies within them?

We've accepted over 100,000 Iraqi refugees since the start of the Iraq war and you can count the amount of terrorism related incidents that came from this on one hand.

Security doesn't strike nearly as much of a threat as the financial burden does.

If anyone knows about fiances. It is trump. I'm voting for him all the way.

Can someone take someone who used to be in the WWE seriously as the leader Of our country is a question you should ask yourself

ComplexDesigns wrote LOL And he says hes not racist lololololol

Muslim is a religion, not a race.

KyloCrux wrote

Lavish wrote

KyloCrux wrote Because he isn't right? All of these Syrians Nobama is letting in, how do we know there aren't ISIS spies within them?

We've accepted over 100,000 Iraqi refugees since the start of the Iraq war and you can count the amount of terrorism related incidents that came from this on one hand.

Security doesn't strike nearly as much of a threat as the financial burden does.

If anyone knows about fiances. It is trump. I'm voting for him all the way.

Congratulations, you have mastered the politicians dodge.
Is challenged or dis-proven -> Ignore this point -> Use statement in their answer and twist it in your favor.

You think Donald Trump is the only presidential candidate who knows how to handle money?

Not even mentioning that your statement is dubious at best considering his financial history.
He's made his money by screwing over the thousands of people who have worked for him.

---

Seam wrote

One thing you need to understand is that a lot of America will still vote for the guy because of the sheer amount of racists you have.

Guys a tool, looks like a broken mop.

I'll leave you with this.

---

Lol, your spam is more detailed then my average reply. Top kek

-Deano wrote Trump is such a buffoon, it's unreal.

A tiny, minute fraction of Muslims are anything to do with ISIS. Better ban the entirety of them.

That's like banning people based on their preference for liking cheese just because one serial killer said he liked cheese.

Unbelievably stupid. I don't get how he has such a strong foothold. I worry for the US.

---

---

You can't stump the Trump!

CODLTHAT1OR3O wrote

Xioko wrote

But, sanders has a far better idea of how to help the common people (especially his free college plan, since I am about to go), and he wants to break big banks, (keyword, wants), and as such, I believe he is the best candidate

I really didn't want to do this, but I guess I'll get a little politically involved, and I'll try to keep it more factual than interjecting my opinions. The problem with all these social programs that Sanders is wanting to implement, is that they take away incentive to work as hard as you possibly can, causing not as many new technologies to be invented, thus causing an overall decline in innovation, and possibly economic growth. Right now I'm in High School, so my opinion on what I'm about to say could very much change. If I were to "benefit" from Sander's "free" college system, I would have much lower incentive to get into the work force, and thus help economic growth, as I wouldn't have debts to pay off. I can agree with a few of Sander's views, like the big bank thing you mentioned, but the reality of the matter is, that's not the most important issue right now, so, as much as I hate it, it can be, and possibly should be left alone for now.

There is no evidence you can point to that validates the point you just made. Sanders wants a to level the playing field, not give anyone an advantage. That means taxing the rich and giving money back to the common-man and cutting outrageous college costs that, if anything, inhibit innovation. Giving me free college means I don't have to worry about a shadow of debt that will follow me for 30 years and I can focus on my career. I'm not seeing how that is unfriendly to innovation. And anyways, if you were to benefit from the free college system and then not be motivated to enter the workforce then there's no purpose in post-secondary education for you. That's a you thing.

I'm in college because I'm inspired to do something great with my life. Having no debt would merely be a convenience. Debt associated with college is like the getting wet aspect of swimming. I swim for fun. I inevitably get wet. But I deal with it because swimming is fun.

aNaughtyCuban wrote

CODLTHAT1OR3O wrote

Xioko wrote

But, sanders has a far better idea of how to help the common people (especially his free college plan, since I am about to go), and he wants to break big banks, (keyword, wants), and as such, I believe he is the best candidate

I really didn't want to do this, but I guess I'll get a little politically involved, and I'll try to keep it more factual than interjecting my opinions. The problem with all these social programs that Sanders is wanting to implement, is that they take away incentive to work as hard as you possibly can, causing not as many new technologies to be invented, thus causing an overall decline in innovation, and possibly economic growth. Right now I'm in High School, so my opinion on what I'm about to say could very much change. If I were to "benefit" from Sander's "free" college system, I would have much lower incentive to get into the work force, and thus help economic growth, as I wouldn't have debts to pay off. I can agree with a few of Sander's views, like the big bank thing you mentioned, but the reality of the matter is, that's not the most important issue right now, so, as much as I hate it, it can be, and possibly should be left alone for now.

There is no evidence you can point to that validates the point you just made. Sanders wants a to level the playing field, not give anyone an advantage. That means taxing the rich and giving money back to the common-man and cutting outrageous college costs that, if anything, inhibit innovation. Giving me free college means I don't have to worry about a shadow of debt that will follow me for 30 years and I can focus on my career. I'm not seeing how that is unfriendly to innovation. And anyways, if you were to benefit from the free college system and then not be motivated to enter the workforce then there's no purpose in post-secondary education for you. That's a you thing.

I'm in college because I'm inspired to do something great with my life. Having no debt would merely be a convenience. Debt associated with college is like the getting wet aspect of swimming. I swim for fun. I inevitably get wet. But I deal with it because swimming is fun.

It's free college for you, but it's the "common-man" that is having to pick up the tab when it comes to paying for it.

The same situation is happening with Obamacare right now. Insurers are being forced to cover high-risk people, so the normal folks are having their premiums nearly doubled to pick up the tab.