Sanctorum wrote
Okay, so what about that guy that got shot while reaching for his ID after being told to do so? Was he "resisting" and "acting like a moron"?

That guy was a suspect in an armed robbery. He said he had a gun on him. So the officer was probably on edge. The dude probably reached for his ID suddenly and without warning, which the officer probably took as reaching for the gun. None of that is on video. Only conveniently the part afterwards where they claim he was shot for no reason.

---

WhatsBrackinBlood wrote Ha like I honestly care. I've had to grow up with racism my whole life so of course I'm going to dish it back.

So you;re saying you're racist. And now you're acting out against innocent people of another race because they disagree with you? Point **** proven. Get out of here, kid.

Illustrated wrote That guy was a suspect in an armed robbery. He said he had a gun on him. So the officer was probably on edge. The dude probably reached for his ID suddenly and without warning, which the officer probably took as reaching for the gun. None of that is on video. Only conveniently the part afterwards where they claim he was shot for no reason.

You can't just make claims without providing proof.

How did I know you'd come back, get upset, downvote my comment, and then not even properly read or reply to my post. You're just brushing what I say off, and saying shit like "well hurr durr people deserve to be shot because morons". Okay then. It's alright, I get it, you just don't understand.

Sanctorum wrote

Illustrated wrote That guy was a suspect in an armed robbery. He said he had a gun on him. So the officer was probably on edge. The dude probably reached for his ID suddenly and without warning, which the officer probably took as reaching for the gun. None of that is on video. Only conveniently the part afterwards where they claim he was shot for no reason.

You can't just make claims without providing proof.

How did I know you'd come back, get upset, downvote my comment, and then not even properly read or reply to my post. You're just brushing what I say off, and saying shit like "well hurr durr people deserve to be shot because morons". Okay then. It's alright, I get it, you just don't understand.

NOBODY has proof! That's the thing! There's no proof he DIDN'T do that. I'm speculating what probably happened.

I'm not upset. I just don't agree, and I'm proving my point in every reply to every comment.

Illustrated wrote NOBODY has proof! That's the thing! There's no proof he DIDN'T do that. I'm speculating what probably happened.

I'm not upset. I just don't agree, and I'm proving my point in every reply to every comment.

That's the thing though, you're acting is if it's a fact. I'm not even saying these particular incidents are an issue, but you're acting like police brutality isn't an issue. You're trying to say that certain officers don't use excessive force at times. Which is just beyond stupid, sorry.

You're ignoring the majority of what I've said, you've done it a few times, and then told me that I "didn't understand" without actually replying to what I said. I was kind of mimicking you as a joke by saying that you don't understand. I'm sure you do get what I'm saying, but you clearly have a different opinion, that's fine, I don't care. All I'm saying is that there absolutely are corrupt police out there, there absolutely are civilians being shot, killed, and attacked by police for no valid reason, and that you absolutely can not justify everything that every police officer has done. I'm not at all saying the entire police force is an issue or anything like that, but that there are issues within the police.

Sanctorum wrote

Illustrated wrote NOBODY has proof! That's the thing! There's no proof he DIDN'T do that. I'm speculating what probably happened.

I'm not upset. I just don't agree, and I'm proving my point in every reply to every comment.

That's the thing though, you're acting is if it's a fact. I'm not even saying these particular incidents are an issue, but you're acting like police brutality isn't an issue. You're trying to say that certain officers don't use excessive force at times. Which is just beyond stupid, sorry.

You're ignoring the majority of what I've said, you've done it a few times, and then told me that I "didn't understand" without actually replying to what I said. I was kind of mimicking you as a joke by saying that you don't understand. I'm sure you do get what I'm saying, but you clearly have a different opinion, that's fine, I don't care. All I'm saying is that there absolutely are corrupt police out there, there absolutely are civilians being shot, killed, and attacked by police for no valid reason, and that you absolutely can not justify everything that every police officer has done. I'm not at all saying the entire police force is an issue or anything like that, but that there are issues within the police.

I stated a few facts. And my speculation was noted with this 'probably' happened. I'm not saying police brutality doesn;t exist as a whole. But in general MOST claims are false or justified.

And this is why topics like this shouldn't be posted on here.

Closed.