You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 72
Reputation Power: 4
Lavish wroteYou are in denial my friend.-Pawn wrote That plane is huge so there would certainly be debris. It doesn't just disappear into thin air.
Except it sorta does. When you crash a plane into a solid wall, it will virtually disintegrate.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 17, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,561
Reputation Power: 231
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 17, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,561
Reputation Power: 231
I'm not that educated in such matters, but wouldn't it be safe to assume that the building is made of stronger material than it appears? For example you would think the capital of the country would have bullet proof glass
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 20159Year Member
Posts: 1,452
Reputation Power: 1410
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 20159Year Member
Posts: 1,452
Reputation Power: 1410
i reckon it was the "camo dudes"
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Renzel wroteLavish wroteYou are in denial my friend.-Pawn wrote That plane is huge so there would certainly be debris. It doesn't just disappear into thin air.
Except it sorta does. When you crash a plane into a solid wall, it will virtually disintegrate.
Do you have an explanation for why he is wrong?
As a person who is undecided on this I would like to hear your explanation as to why the plane would not have disintegrated after hitting a wall at 530mph.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 72
Reputation Power: 4
Wight wroteRenzel wroteLavish wroteYou are in denial my friend.-Pawn wrote That plane is huge so there would certainly be debris. It doesn't just disappear into thin air.
Except it sorta does. When you crash a plane into a solid wall, it will virtually disintegrate.
Do you have an explanation for why he is wrong?
As a person who is undecided on this I would like to hear your explanation as to why the plane would not have disintegrated after hitting a wall at 530mph.
Why is there only 1 video of the attack? The pentagon is heavily guarded with more then 1 camera. So why did they release only 1 footage? There was a nearby gas station that had a camera and the FBI confiscated the evidence? Why tho?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7349
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7349
iOSx wrote I'm not that educated in such matters, but wouldn't it be safe to assume that the building is made of stronger material than it appears? For example you would think the capital of the country would have bullet proof glass
Funny you should mention that. I heard, though haven't confirmed that the Pentagon at the time was under construction to protect its self from aerial attacks. All sides but the one that was hit was complete. I will see if I can confirm that or not.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.