This is sad! Wished they would give him a chance I mean he already is doing work! 2.5 million Americans wanna leave the USA that's 2.5 million jobs that he has created.

Swift wrote these assholes blocked my way getting home yesterday going through downtown Austin
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

They need to get the hell over it. i understand protesting is okay, but do it in one place and dont mess with other peoples day.

The Newly elected city council member said we need "a resistance" Like what the shit are you talking about.

How long you were waiting for? I bet hours right?

Lavish wrote Exercising their right to freedom of assembly. It's the sign of a healthy democracy.
The difference between these protests and the Tea Party protests is that they were actually organic and spontaneous.

okay

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Lavish wrote

Cokes wrote

Veidt wrote There is a distinction between not accepting the results and not accepting the winner.

They literally mean the exact same thing. The results are that Trump is the winner and they are not accepting this by rioting and screaming "F--- Trump", or saying "He's not my President". I would love to hear the explanation on how they are different.

Veidt wrote Trump spread the idea that the election itself was rigged. These people just hate that he did win.

Because Hillary Clinton had a history with it, cheating at debates, colluding with Super PAC's, the DNC, the media and paying people to incite riots at rallies, the usual. It's not like you're dealing with someone that is ethical. He's right to question the legitimacy of the election, just like [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] in '08 that nobody seems to mention.

You're acting as if Donald was questioning the election for any reason other than the fact that he was preparing the excuse he was going to use if he had lost.
This guy is a known sore loser.

Donald said the damn Emmys were rigged when he didn't win.

Highly doubt he would claim rigged elections if he was running against Sanders, ya know, someone who doesn't have a history of rigging elections. His concerns were totally fair, and it doesn't matter what the reasoning behind it was. What happened with Sanders and the DNC is grounds enough to have concerns of the general election.

Lyttle wrote

Lavish wrote Exercising their right to freedom of assembly. It's the sign of a healthy democracy.
The difference between these protests and the Tea Party protests is that they were actually organic and spontaneous.

okay

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Do you have anything other than a social media post of pictures of busses to prove that it is in fact protestors being bussed in?

Cokes wrote

Veidt wrote There is a distinction between not accepting the results and not accepting the winner.

They literally mean the exact same thing. The results are that Trump is the winner and they are not accepting this by rioting and screaming "F--- Trump", or saying "He's not my President". I would love to hear the explanation on how they are different.

Veidt wrote Trump spread the idea that the election itself was rigged. These people just hate that he did win.

Because Hillary Clinton had a history with it, cheating at debates, colluding with Super PAC's, the DNC, the media and paying people to incite riots at rallies, the usual. It's not like you're dealing with someone that is ethical. He's right to question the legitimacy of the election, just like [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] in '08 that nobody seems to mention.

Liberals were against Donald Trump not accepting the result because he was saying it was rigged against him. Whether or not that claim has any truth doesn't matter in this conversation, that wasn't my point.

These people can accept that he won the election, the voting side of things. They just won't accept him as president because of his character.

I haven't looked into the claim that Obama made but I'll take your word for it. I've never claimed that liberals are devoid of hypocrisy but the point still stands. Questioning the legitimacy of the election and saying that the winner shouldn't be president are two very distinct things.

Trump maybe our next president, but he's already causing trouble and confusion. It worries me that Russia likes this man and even may have contact with Trump's team. Doesn't that have a little concern for anyone?

Original_Lay wrote Trump maybe our next president, but he's already causing trouble and confusion. It worries me that Russia likes this man and even may have contact with Trump's team. Doesn't that have a little concern for anyone?

Russia don't want smoke

Yamborghini wrote

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



2016, Democrats riot in protest. 2008, Democrats riot in celebration. Maybe Democrats just really like rioting.

I'm glad that you posted the picture proving the fact that the majority of voters didn't vote for Trump.