You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#51. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 13, 200915Year Member
Posts: 1,004
Reputation Power: 41
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 13, 200915Year Member
Posts: 1,004
Reputation Power: 41
id give it a go
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#52. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 58
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 58
Reputation Power: 2
see here's how this is... the people who don't try it say how much it sucks and the people who do try it get atleast past round 100
WTF????
WTF????
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#53. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 31, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,163
Reputation Power: 289
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 31, 200915Year Member
Posts: 3,163
Reputation Power: 289
TheLastDonut wrote see here's how this is... the people who don't try it say how much it sucks and the people who do try it get atleast past round 100
WTF????
maybe there to lazy to try it, i tryied it and it worked good
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#54. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 58
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 07, 200915Year Member
Posts: 58
Reputation Power: 2
apeacefulmon wroteTheLastDonut wrote see here's how this is... the people who don't try it say how much it sucks and the people who do try it get atleast past round 100
WTF????
maybe there to lazy to try it, i tryied it and it worked good
exactly, thats the problem here. There should be a rule against randomly pmsing on a thread with no evidence against it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.