Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote

-LizardLick wrote 4-2-3-1

Hart
Walker Jagielka Cahill Cole
Wilshere Gerrard
Townsend Rooney Welbeck
Sturridge

Welbeck!? WELBECK!? Dafuq... You would have Townsend over Walcott and Welbeck over Lallana?

Welbeck plays well for a England, although he has a poor recored at club level he does but a good shift in and links up well.

All Walcott can do is run. Nothing else, Townsend can get past players not forgetting he actually has a final product.

All he can do is run eh?

What does this prove? His all round finishing is terrible hahahaha and if you can't agree on that then you clearly have no meaning like most your other posts.

Goes through 4 players there.

Finishing is bad eh?

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.

Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

Feels wrote

Click to View Content

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote

-LizardLick wrote 4-2-3-1

Hart
Walker Jagielka Cahill Cole
Wilshere Gerrard
Townsend Rooney Welbeck
Sturridge

Welbeck!? WELBECK!? Dafuq... You would have Townsend over Walcott and Welbeck over Lallana?

Welbeck plays well for a England, although he has a poor recored at club level he does but a good shift in and links up well.

All Walcott can do is run. Nothing else, Townsend can get past players not forgetting he actually has a final product.

All he can do is run eh?

What does this prove? His all round finishing is terrible hahahaha and if you can't agree on that then you clearly have no meaning like most your other posts.

Goes through 4 players there.

Finishing is bad eh?

Yeah, he just can't accept that Walcott is a decent player because he plays for Arsenal.

Fact of the matter is, he scored more goals in the Premier League last season than all of Chelsea's attacking players. He can't be that bad, eh? ;)

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.

Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.

Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?

Gotta_Have_It wrote

invalidslinky wrote

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.

Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?

How does going undefeated the whole season mean you are the best team in history?

Feels wrote That Invincibles team was one of the best in history. We're nowhere near that level anymore, though.

Anyway, I think it's actually ridiculous how you can judge Townsend (who as you said, has only had one real chance in the Spurs line up) is better than Walcott. How can you judge a player on 10 games? Bloody ridiculous.

Don't question anyone else's knowledge on football when yours doesn't seem that up-to-scratch either bud.

Feels wrote

-LizardLick wrote

Feels wrote That Invincibles team was one of the best in history. We're nowhere near that level anymore, though.

Anyway, I think it's actually ridiculous how you can judge Townsend (who as you said, has only had one real chance in the Spurs line up) is better than Walcott. How can you judge a player on 10 games? Bloody ridiculous.

Don't question anyone else's knowledge on football when yours doesn't seem that up-to-scratch either bud.

Have you even read what I've put,

'Who would you rather have in your England team'
Townsend, nah Walcott is this and that, I would still rather have Townsend.

Up to scratch? Lmfao I couldn't care what you think, Yours isn't either, anything against Arsenal is wrong.

Loooool, once again with the biased comments. Getting a tiny bit old now bud, try and think of something new.
Also, I said it's your opinion, that's cool. I then proceeded to ask you why you would rather have Townsend, and that's where this debate stemmed from.

I can guarantee Brad and OhDavidLuiz will come along soon backing you, just because they're Chelsea fans too. I'd bet so much money that if you weren't a Chelsea fan, they'd probably disagree with everything you've been saying.