Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

SuperFrank wrote

Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

Hmm personally I believe Salah is a good signing, quick, hard working, direct and Mourinho likes having a winger then can cut in like Robben, Di Maria etc. He was relatively cheap for a squad player that can improve loads and at 21 he can become a world class player in the future, roughly leaving us 20m to spends somewhere else.

I think 26m-31m(which you suggested) is far over priced for an average player.

Ibracadabra wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

Hmm personally I believe Salah is a good signing, quick, hard working, direct and Mourinho likes having a winger then can cut in like Robben, Di Maria etc. He was relatively cheap for a squad player that can improve loads and at 21 he can become a world class player in the future, roughly leaving us 20m to spends somewhere else.

I think 26m-31m(which you suggested) is far over priced for an average player.

Griezmann is far from "Average".

SuperFrank wrote

Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

Hmm personally I believe Salah is a good signing, quick, hard working, direct and Mourinho likes having a winger then can cut in like Robben, Di Maria etc. He was relatively cheap for a squad player that can improve loads and at 21 he can become a world class player in the future, roughly leaving us 20m to spends somewhere else.

I think 26m-31m(which you suggested) is far over priced for an average player.

Coushy wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

Hmm personally I believe Salah is a good signing, quick, hard working, direct and Mourinho likes having a winger then can cut in like Robben, Di Maria etc. He was relatively cheap for a squad player that can improve loads and at 21 he can become a world class player in the future, roughly leaving us 20m to spends somewhere else.

I think 26m-31m(which you suggested) is far over priced for an average player.

Implying Salah is better than Griezmann.

SuperFrank wrote

Coushy wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

Hmm personally I believe Salah is a good signing, quick, hard working, direct and Mourinho likes having a winger then can cut in like Robben, Di Maria etc. He was relatively cheap for a squad player that can improve loads and at 21 he can become a world class player in the future, roughly leaving us 20m to spends somewhere else.

I think 26m-31m(which you suggested) is far over priced for an average player.

Implying Salah is better than Griezmann.

Where did I say Salah was better or even compare the 2??

There would have been no point on selling Mata then buying an average player for 10 million less.

Coushy wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Coushy wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Ibracadabra wrote I don't understand why Chelsea signed Salah, we should of just paid 15-20 mil more for Griezmann.

Hmm personally I believe Salah is a good signing, quick, hard working, direct and Mourinho likes having a winger then can cut in like Robben, Di Maria etc. He was relatively cheap for a squad player that can improve loads and at 21 he can become a world class player in the future, roughly leaving us 20m to spends somewhere else.

I think 26m-31m(which you suggested) is far over priced for an average player.

Implying Salah is better than Griezmann.

Where did I say Salah was better or even compare the 2??

There would have been no point on selling Mata then buying an average player for 10 million less.

You didnt say it, hence why i said you implied it.