#5001. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Haha pellegrini can shut his mouth. Chelsea a small team....ok whatever. Surely Mourinho will have a quality response |
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#5002. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
http://i.gyazo.com/db45dddfc6ebeddaaafc98fc83b57e4b.png
He's feeling the pressure already |
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#5003. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
BigRedMachine wrote Haha pellegrini can shut his mouth. Chelsea a small team....ok whatever. Surely Mourinho will have a quality response vine.co/v/hLaFLIbWPgW |
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#5004. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,548
Reputation Power: 491
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,548
Reputation Power: 491
Jovetic wrote Chelsea gets penetrated for 90 minutes and it's 1-1 to a 10 man City. Can't tell if I'm happy or upset. Chelsea never deserved the draw, They just parked the bus. Man City should of came away with the 3 points. |
- 1useful
- 2not useful
#5005. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Lounge wroteJovetic wrote Chelsea gets penetrated for 90 minutes and it's 1-1 to a 10 man City. Can't tell if I'm happy or upset. For what reason? Because they had control of the ball? They failed to create any clear cut chances & given the circumstances at the end, I'm sure 95% of City fans won't be upset with the final result |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5006. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Lounge wroteJovetic wrote Chelsea gets penetrated for 90 minutes and it's 1-1 to a 10 man City. Can't tell if I'm happy or upset. I don't buy into this bark the pus nonsense. It's called being tactical, football isn't always about playing it to entertain, why would we go to city and play open football like we have against the swans and Everton and risk conceding even more than 3 goals with the attack force man city have. Ok it's not the most fun thing to watch but as far as Mourinho and Chelsea are concerned it works against the big teams, we nearly took maximum points from top 7 teams last season and this season we've got 4 points from City and Everton away when last year it was 3. Also pellegrini pretty much done the same against Bayern in mid-week. I am happy playing counter-attacking football, because that's what is, against teams like City if we go and play entertaining football like we have been doing against other teams. |
- 2useful
- 1not useful
#5007. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201112Year Member
Posts: 4,366
Reputation Power: 357
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201112Year Member
Posts: 4,366
Reputation Power: 357
We were never going to play a fluid attacking game against Man City at the Etihad, it just wasn't going to happen. That's not to say our starting line up isn't strong enough to do that capably but rather that we're still working to find the correct balance between attack and defence. Sure we've been brilliant up front but what was last season the league's best defence has struggled against rather weak opposition. It was far too early to risk a thrashing, especially to a title rival.
The Lampard goal was unfortunate but in some distorted way, I'm happy it was him. It's showed Chelsea fans in a positive light (very rare occurrence) for cheering Lampard on before and after kick off. He's a club legend and has done as much for us as anyone during the most successful period of our club history. We won't forget that. He's a professional, he scored, we'll move on. I am interested to hear more United fans views on their current situation.. |
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#5008. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,548
Reputation Power: 491
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 01, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,548
Reputation Power: 491
OhDavidLuiz wrote We were never going to play a fluid attacking game against Man City at the Etihad, it just wasn't going to happen. That's not to say our starting line up isn't strong enough to do that capably but rather that we're still working to find the correct balance between attack and defence. Sure we've been brilliant up front but what was last season the league's best defence has struggled against rather weak opposition. It was far too early to risk a thrashing, especially to a title rival. Our defence is horrible, I think everyone can see that. We have a brilliant attack but in January IF we get a strong CB then we can get more confidence in the fans, And no im not saying we will win the title or that. But we really need to find someone to replace Vidic, Someone who isnt afraid and makes very important tackles at the right moment, If we can get that type of player, Who can command our defence then we will be much stronger, Lets face it, Against the likes of Chelsea and city, We will be more than likely beat. Although i think we can at least score a few goals as we have a good attack. I personally think we can beat Liverpool and Arsenal, But we will struggle badly against City and Chelsea. So That's my opinion on the united situation. |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5009. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,156
Reputation Power: 95
OhDavidLuiz wrote We were never going to play a fluid attacking game against Man City at the Etihad, it just wasn't going to happen. That's not to say our starting line up isn't strong enough to do that capably but rather that we're still working to find the correct balance between attack and defence. Sure we've been brilliant up front but what was last season the league's best defence has struggled against rather weak opposition. It was far too early to risk a thrashing, especially to a title rival. I don't know why you have to bring the most successful team in English History possibly the world due to how hard it is to win the premier league. Real Madrid are currently in 7th and 6points the leaders, bayern Munich are fourth in the bundesliga although on the same points as the ones above, Dortmund are 10th, Liverpool are 11th, Everton are 14th and Tottenham are 9th. So there's plenty of world class teams not doing so well. |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5010. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 5,491
Reputation Power: 283
360MoTioN wroteOhDavidLuiz wrote We were never going to play a fluid attacking game against Man City at the Etihad, it just wasn't going to happen. That's not to say our starting line up isn't strong enough to do that capably but rather that we're still working to find the correct balance between attack and defence. Sure we've been brilliant up front but what was last season the league's best defence has struggled against rather weak opposition. It was far too early to risk a thrashing, especially to a title rival. Half the teams you bring up there aren't even "world class" |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
Users browsing this topic: Frog