Ultimate TeamWhat's your formation?
Posted:
Ultimate TeamWhat's your formation?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,377
Reputation Power: 660
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,377
Reputation Power: 660
Just curious what everyone is running and how you play?
I typically play more narrow 4312/4321 but just get destroyed by anyone in a 442 and can't seem to figure out how to play effectively with that formation. |
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
4-4-3(4) has been unreal for me, only started playing again in the past week! Haven't even touched the custom tactics!
|
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 27, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,854
Reputation Power: 613
C-Jay wrotenever been a fan of the 433 but I got to agree. This years it's nuts |
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
182 wroteC-Jay wrotenever been a fan of the 433 but I got to agree. This years it's nuts Yeah I've got potm solanke up front on his own and he's unbelievable! I usually use custom tactics but tried it without and I can't fault it! |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,377
Reputation Power: 660
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,377
Reputation Power: 660
CJ wrote182 wroteC-Jay wrotenever been a fan of the 433 but I got to agree. This years it's nuts Midfields not a problem? I get smoked in any 433, probably too aggressive |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 13,786
Reputation Power: 15049
Motto: Quack
Motto: Quack
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 13,786
Reputation Power: 15049
Motto: Quack
CJ wrote Huh? |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
Frog wroteCJ wrote Mean 4-3-3(4) lol |
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,894
Reputation Power: 4888
corgi wroteCJ wrote182 wroteC-Jay wrotenever been a fan of the 433 but I got to agree. This years it's nuts I got one cm with high defence and the other high/high seems pretty solid still |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,377
Reputation Power: 660
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,377
Reputation Power: 660
CJ wrotecorgi wroteCJ wrote182 wroteC-Jay wrotenever been a fan of the 433 but I got to agree. This years it's nuts What tactics/instructions? Every defensive mid I have even Low ATT rate wants to be a striker |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
Users browsing this topic: None