HTFC wrote Excuse me? what have Yorkshire teams ever done wrong to you!!

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote Honestly though how is chelsea bigger?
They have one european cup and not much history yet they are a bigger club
Also not being horrible but Bradford is a bigger club then Huddersfield.
Huddersfield is a better club now but is not bigger than Bradford.
Same with Chelsea.
Better than Liverpool but not a bigger club by no means.

Once again you fail to recognise the true definition of bigger.(I understand you scousers don't have an education).
Yes, your more 'successful', im not going to disagree on that however success and size isn't under the same category.

I agree with the comparison to Huddersfield and Bradford. Not even close, Bradford are on another level LOL

Actually were both wrong Huddersfield is bigger than Bradford.
You need to know that history makes a club big yanno.
Ask any AC Milan or Real Madrid fan.

I was only winding him up, dislike every team from Yorkshire haha

I totally agree, success brings you money, fans and fame etc. That's all in the past for Liverpool, history has made you a big club but at present we're going through that stage and it has developed us into a bigger club. For instance if a team like West Ham dominated the next 10 years, they would become a bigger club then both Chelsea and Liverpool.

Do Liverpool only have their history btw? gets boring after you've heard the same thing a million times.

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote Honestly though how is chelsea bigger?
They have one european cup and not much history yet they are a bigger club
Also not being horrible but Bradford is a bigger club then Huddersfield.
Huddersfield is a better club now but is not bigger than Bradford.
Same with Chelsea.
Better than Liverpool but not a bigger club by no means.

Once again you fail to recognise the true definition of bigger.(I understand you scousers don't have an education).
Yes, your more 'successful', im not going to disagree on that however success and size isn't under the same category.

I agree with the comparison to Huddersfield and Bradford. Not even close, Bradford are on another level LOL

Actually were both wrong Huddersfield is bigger than Bradford.
You need to know that history makes a club big yanno.
Ask any AC Milan or Real Madrid fan.

I was only winding him up, dislike every team from Yorkshire haha

I totally agree, success brings you money, fans and fame etc. That's all in the past for Liverpool, history has made you a big club but at present we're going through that stage and it has developed us into a bigger club. For instance if a team like West Ham dominated the next 10 years, they would become a bigger club then both Chelsea and Liverpool.

Do Liverpool only have their history btw? gets boring after you've heard the same thing a million times.

No it does not make them a big club.
That's why Chelsea is not a big club.

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote Honestly though how is chelsea bigger?
They have one european cup and not much history yet they are a bigger club
Also not being horrible but Bradford is a bigger club then Huddersfield.
Huddersfield is a better club now but is not bigger than Bradford.
Same with Chelsea.
Better than Liverpool but not a bigger club by no means.

Once again you fail to recognise the true definition of bigger.(I understand you scousers don't have an education).
Yes, your more 'successful', im not going to disagree on that however success and size isn't under the same category.

I agree with the comparison to Huddersfield and Bradford. Not even close, Bradford are on another level LOL

Actually were both wrong Huddersfield is bigger than Bradford.
You need to know that history makes a club big yanno.
Ask any AC Milan or Real Madrid fan.

I was only winding him up, dislike every team from Yorkshire haha

I totally agree, success brings you money, fans and fame etc. That's all in the past for Liverpool, history has made you a big club but at present we're going through that stage and it has developed us into a bigger club. For instance if a team like West Ham dominated the next 10 years, they would become a bigger club then both Chelsea and Liverpool.

Do Liverpool only have their history btw? gets boring after you've heard the same thing a million times.

No it does not make them a big club.
That's why Chelsea is not a big club.

Look at your arguments, you can tell you around 15 years of age, can't develop a reasonable argument.

Chelsea isn't a big club haha, we're 7th amongst Europe's elites(net worth) and ranked 4th by UEFA, Liverpool are 30th, all about pre-historic times for Liverpool.


Proof: uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote Honestly though how is chelsea bigger?
They have one european cup and not much history yet they are a bigger club
Also not being horrible but Bradford is a bigger club then Huddersfield.
Huddersfield is a better club now but is not bigger than Bradford.
Same with Chelsea.
Better than Liverpool but not a bigger club by no means.

Once again you fail to recognise the true definition of bigger.(I understand you scousers don't have an education).
Yes, your more 'successful', im not going to disagree on that however success and size isn't under the same category.

I agree with the comparison to Huddersfield and Bradford. Not even close, Bradford are on another level LOL

Actually were both wrong Huddersfield is bigger than Bradford.
You need to know that history makes a club big yanno.
Ask any AC Milan or Real Madrid fan.

I was only winding him up, dislike every team from Yorkshire haha

I totally agree, success brings you money, fans and fame etc. That's all in the past for Liverpool, history has made you a big club but at present we're going through that stage and it has developed us into a bigger club. For instance if a team like West Ham dominated the next 10 years, they would become a bigger club then both Chelsea and Liverpool.

Do Liverpool only have their history btw? gets boring after you've heard the same thing a million times.

No it does not make them a big club.
That's why Chelsea is not a big club.

Look at your arguments, you can tell you around 15 years of age, can't develop a reasonable argument.

Chelsea isn't a big club haha, we're 7th amongst Europe's elites(net worth) and ranked 4th by UEFA, Liverpool are 30th, all about pre-historic times for Liverpool.


Proof: uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/

That has nothing to do with being a big club!
PSG was formed in like something 1970 and they are no way near a big club.

Brad- wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote Honestly though how is chelsea bigger?
They have one european cup and not much history yet they are a bigger club
Also not being horrible but Bradford is a bigger club then Huddersfield.
Huddersfield is a better club now but is not bigger than Bradford.
Same with Chelsea.
Better than Liverpool but not a bigger club by no means.

Once again you fail to recognise the true definition of bigger.(I understand you scousers don't have an education).
Yes, your more 'successful', im not going to disagree on that however success and size isn't under the same category.

I agree with the comparison to Huddersfield and Bradford. Not even close, Bradford are on another level LOL

Actually were both wrong Huddersfield is bigger than Bradford.
You need to know that history makes a club big yanno.
Ask any AC Milan or Real Madrid fan.

I was only winding him up, dislike every team from Yorkshire haha

I totally agree, success brings you money, fans and fame etc. That's all in the past for Liverpool, history has made you a big club but at present we're going through that stage and it has developed us into a bigger club. For instance if a team like West Ham dominated the next 10 years, they would become a bigger club then both Chelsea and Liverpool.

Do Liverpool only have their history btw? gets boring after you've heard the same thing a million times.

No it does not make them a big club.
That's why Chelsea is not a big club.

Look at your arguments, you can tell you around 15 years of age, can't develop a reasonable argument.

Chelsea isn't a big club haha, we're 7th amongst Europe's elites(net worth) and ranked 4th by UEFA, Liverpool are 30th, all about pre-historic times for Liverpool.


Proof: uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/

That has nothing to do with being a big club!
PSG was formed in like something 1970 and they are no way near a big club.

So what is a 'big club' in your eyes? I asked you this yesterday, you saw the post, never posted then went off the topic

Henderson14 wrote

Brad- wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote

SuperFrank wrote

Henderson14 wrote Honestly though how is chelsea bigger?
They have one european cup and not much history yet they are a bigger club
Also not being horrible but Bradford is a bigger club then Huddersfield.
Huddersfield is a better club now but is not bigger than Bradford.
Same with Chelsea.
Better than Liverpool but not a bigger club by no means.

Once again you fail to recognise the true definition of bigger.(I understand you scousers don't have an education).
Yes, your more 'successful', im not going to disagree on that however success and size isn't under the same category.

I agree with the comparison to Huddersfield and Bradford. Not even close, Bradford are on another level LOL

Actually were both wrong Huddersfield is bigger than Bradford.
You need to know that history makes a club big yanno.
Ask any AC Milan or Real Madrid fan.

I was only winding him up, dislike every team from Yorkshire haha

I totally agree, success brings you money, fans and fame etc. That's all in the past for Liverpool, history has made you a big club but at present we're going through that stage and it has developed us into a bigger club. For instance if a team like West Ham dominated the next 10 years, they would become a bigger club then both Chelsea and Liverpool.

Do Liverpool only have their history btw? gets boring after you've heard the same thing a million times.

No it does not make them a big club.
That's why Chelsea is not a big club.

Look at your arguments, you can tell you around 15 years of age, can't develop a reasonable argument.

Chelsea isn't a big club haha, we're 7th amongst Europe's elites(net worth) and ranked 4th by UEFA, Liverpool are 30th, all about pre-historic times for Liverpool.


Proof: uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/

That has nothing to do with being a big club!
PSG was formed in like something 1970 and they are no way near a big club.

So what is a 'big club' in your eyes? I asked you this yesterday, you saw the post, never posted then went off the topic

A big club is who have a big fan base and loads of history as well as class!
oh ye 5 times as well.

Brad- wrote Chelsea have Stoke tomorrow, should win it quite comfortably

SuperFrank wrote

Brad- wrote Chelsea have Stoke tomorrow, should win it quite comfortably

Hopefully Matic can make his 1st start back at the bridge, that's a physical game he will thrive in. I would like to see Ba develop some playing time aswell.


My prediction: 3-0 Ba(2), Cahill.