360MoTioN wrote

Click to View Content

Brad- wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote

360MoTioN wrote

HTAFC wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.

Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.

He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could

Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.

Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.

160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher

Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)

Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.

Typical arrogant Chelsea fans reading only want he wants to read.
I was saying we've won far more titles than Chelsea and we couldn't get any player we wanted so how would Chelsea.

You seem to think when you're linked with a player it's a one horse race, if that's how you think then you're very peculiar.

360MoTioN wrote

Click to View Content

Brad- wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote

360MoTioN wrote

HTAFC wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.

Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.

He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could

Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.

Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.

160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher

Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)

Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.

Typical arrogant Chelsea fans reading only want he wants to read.
I was saying we've won far more titles than Chelsea and we couldn't get any player we wanted so how would Chelsea.

You seem to think when you're linked with a player it's a one horse race, if that's how you think then you're very peculiar.

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Click to View Content

Brad- wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote

360MoTioN wrote

HTAFC wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.

Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.

He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could

Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.

Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.

160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher

Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)

Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.

Typical arrogant Chelsea fans reading only want he wants to read.
I was saying we've won far more titles than Chelsea and we couldn't get any player we wanted so how would Chelsea.

You seem to think when you're linked with a player it's a one horse race, if that's how you think then you're very peculiar.

I know this wasn't dictated at me, but the only thing I'd add to that is that at this point in time Chelsea are looking like they will win a lot of titles where-as Man Utd don't - they may do soon, but t this point they really don't and thats what gives Chelsea the upper hand principally.

Would you not argue that back in 2008/09 when United were on one of their best runs and at their strongest under Sir Alex, they couldn't have attracted pretty much any player they wanted?

360MoTioN wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Click to View Content

Brad- wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote

360MoTioN wrote

HTAFC wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.

Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.

He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could

Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.

Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.

160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher

Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)

Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.

Typical arrogant Chelsea fans reading only want he wants to read.
I was saying we've won far more titles than Chelsea and we couldn't get any player we wanted so how would Chelsea.

You seem to think when you're linked with a player it's a one horse race, if that's how you think then you're very peculiar.

I know this wasn't dictated at me, but the only thing I'd add to that is that at this point in time Chelsea are looking like they will win a lot of titles where-as Man Utd don't - they may do soon, but t this point they really don't and thats what gives Chelsea the upper hand principally.

Would you not argue that back in 2008/09 when United were on one of their best runs and at their strongest under Sir Alex, they couldn't have attracted pretty much any player they wanted?

Yes maybe we could attract more than we could currently, but certainly not anyone we wanted.
We finished 11 points in front of the next team down two seasons ago and the best Moyes you get was Fellaini.

So if we couldn't get much then, what can Chelsea get by beaten by an average league one side 4-2 and being a massive never seen before 5 points clear in the premier league?

I hope you see where I'm coming from as I can see your point but I wouldn't agree with everything you said.

Also just like to add, City were pretty much in the same boat as Chelsea last season and now chelsea fans believe Chelsea is the new Real Madrid.

CompleteDesigns wrote

360MoTioN wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Click to View Content

Brad- wrote

-Fletcher wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote

360MoTioN wrote

HTAFC wrote

360MoTioN wrote

OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.

Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.

He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could

Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.

Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.

160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher

Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)

Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.

Typical arrogant Chelsea fans reading only want he wants to read.
I was saying we've won far more titles than Chelsea and we couldn't get any player we wanted so how would Chelsea.

You seem to think when you're linked with a player it's a one horse race, if that's how you think then you're very peculiar.

I know this wasn't dictated at me, but the only thing I'd add to that is that at this point in time Chelsea are looking like they will win a lot of titles where-as Man Utd don't - they may do soon, but t this point they really don't and thats what gives Chelsea the upper hand principally.

Would you not argue that back in 2008/09 when United were on one of their best runs and at their strongest under Sir Alex, they couldn't have attracted pretty much any player they wanted?

Yes maybe we could attract more than we could currently, but certainly not anyone we wanted.
We finished 11 points in front of the next team down two seasons ago and the best Moyes you get was Fellaini.

So if we couldn't get much then, what can Chelsea get by beaten by an average league one side 4-2 and being a massive never seen before 5 points clear in the premier league?

I hope you see where I'm coming from as I can see your point but I wouldn't agree with everything you said.

Also just like to add, City were pretty much in the same boat as Chelsea last season and now chelsea fans believe Chelsea is the new Real Madrid.

The reason is because we have everything sorted - City are the type to just buy a player , Put him into the team just because he is expensive , Looking at city do they realy have a plan? , We have a team that was the result of a plan which has lead to one of the best teams in the world and most of them are very young so it will last years . Jose is the best manager in the world (IMO) and even if you dont think so he is deffiantly up there.

Are coaching staff / Medics etc are are alot better also.

Look at the players we have attracted - Hazard (Everyone wanted him) , Courtois was wanted by Barca/RM , Costa was wanted by loads , Fabregas (Someone who didnt like Jose) dropped all that when Jose spoke to him