#8611. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Didact wrote
CompleteDesigns wrote
Didact wrote Completed talking wham as per usual.


This is the only forum where its "Acceptable" to call someout out for the oppinion , Without actually giving any points for or against there opinion xD

So due to the fact you support liverpool i assume your mad because i said you had a small club mentality?

Prove me wrong then?

A small club sells there biggest star and brings in Lambert to replace him.
A small club bangs on about its history because it doesent have a future

This isnt a diss at you , Id rather Liverpool beat UTD as i said.

I think its hard to aruge against the fact Liverpool and arsenal have small club mentalitys (Or atleast alot smaller club mentality's than CFC and UTD) and again City are good , But they have no passion.

If your going to say my opinion is wrong , Atleast give points to why xD


Lambert wasn't brought in to replace Suarez, we needed more players to add depth to the squad because of Europe, even though he's shit. It was foolish of our board not to break the bank on a player such as Gotze or Sanchez. For 4 million also, i couldn't really be assed saying he was or wasn't a waste of money.

Secondly, what is with the history shout? It's a shit shout and i said nothing about it. I guess Arsenal fans bang on about their history also in your head.

I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


So as you said , They should of got someone better , But they didnt,They knew they couldent compete with the BIG clubs , hence "Small club mentality"

Liverpool bang on about there history - Not necessary you.

Do liverpool have a good backbone? , I mean backbone as in everything is setup at CFC

Best transfers in the leauge easily recently - Liverpool are shit at transfers
Barely any injuries from CFC (Good medical staff)
Best manager in the leauge - Vs average manager
We have pretty much every good youngstar / Amazing youth and we have used this to get through FFP - Do liverpool do the same?

While your selling you best player to overhaul you squad , We are selling players we dont want for £50M and then buying players like costa and fab for it

We are miles ahead of you - And not just because we have cash , You are delluded if you think otherwise.

Our transfer policy has put has years ahead of most PL clubs alone.
#8612. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Senate wrote
Didact wrote
CompleteDesigns wrote
Didact wrote Completed talking wham as per usual.


This is the only forum where its "Acceptable" to call someout out for the oppinion , Without actually giving any points for or against there opinion xD

So due to the fact you support liverpool i assume your mad because i said you had a small club mentality?

Prove me wrong then?

A small club sells there biggest star and brings in Lambert to replace him.
A small club bangs on about its history because it doesent have a future

This isnt a diss at you , Id rather Liverpool beat UTD as i said.

I think its hard to aruge against the fact Liverpool and arsenal have small club mentalitys (Or atleast alot smaller club mentality's than CFC and UTD) and again City are good , But they have no passion.

If your going to say my opinion is wrong , Atleast give points to why xD


Lambert wasn't brought in to replace Suarez, we needed more players to add depth to the squad because of Europe, even though he's shit. It was foolish of our board not to break the bank on a player such as Gotze or Sanchez. For 4 million also, i couldn't really be assed saying he was or wasn't a waste of money.

Secondly, what is with the history shout? It's a shit shout and i said nothing about it. I guess Arsenal fans bang on about their history also in your head.

I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


Liverpool, maybe not. Arsenal have plenty of money!


The thing is though the money thing is BS . Most of our players have been paid off through champions leauge winnins . Winning PLs , Terry was free , Brana and Azpi were fairly cheap and so was cahill (espically compared to the 20-30M people seem to pay now) Courtois was also dirt cheap as we bought him when he was unkown

then the rest , Expensive players but would be payed off mainly through sales alone - David luiz , Lukuka , Mata , De bruyne , Andre etc.

Him bringing up the cash shows his small club thinking.

Liverpool had over 100M and did NOTHING with it , We done more with 60M than liverpool would do with 200M.
#8613. Posted:
Brad
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...
#8614. Posted:
RoyaI
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,815
Reputation Power: 104
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,815
Reputation Power: 104
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.
#8615. Posted:
Brad
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
RoyaI wrote
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.


We were in Europe for the 7 consecutive seasons before Abramovich, but okay.

We're talking about RECENT years (2/3 seasons), where we have made an exceptional amount of money through the sales of players (David Luiz 40mil, Lukaku 28mil, Mata 40mil, Schurrle 25mil, De Bruyne 25mil just to name a few)...
#8616. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
RoyaI wrote
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.


Yeah i agree , I mean its not as if FFP restricts us spending more than we earn is it?

Idiots how can a russian sugersdaddy spend for us when there is FPP?

Your living in the past xD , We had a cash injection to make a team and it lasted for 10 years and won the CL XD.

Now we make more money than most PL clubs and Spend wisely (Costa and fabregas for the price of selling Luiz) while liverpool are selling Luis suarez for a bunch of Soton players and UTD buying fellini for £28M
#8617. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Brad- wrote
RoyaI wrote
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.


We were in Europe for the 7 consecutive seasons before Abramovich, but okay.

We're talking about RECENT years (2/3 seasons), where we have made an exceptional amount of money through the sales of players (David Luiz 40mil, Lukaku 28mil, Mata 40mil, Schurrle 25mil, De Bruyne 25mil just to name a few)...


Nah were not talking about them . We are talking about 10 years ago when we were formed and when that russian hitman spent 1B on ruining football and making chelsea a force , With that arrogant manager in charge.

All football fans must live in the past xD . I mean tbh i would want to live in the past too , Chelsea are the only successful team in England right now so why would you guys want to focus on the present?
#8618. Posted:
RoyaI
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,815
Reputation Power: 104
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,815
Reputation Power: 104
CompleteDesigns wrote
RoyaI wrote
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.


Yeah i agree , I mean its not as if FFP restricts us spending more than we earn is it?

Idiots how can a russian sugersdaddy spend for us when there is FPP?

Your living in the past xD , We had a cash injection to make a team and it lasted for 10 years and won the CL XD.

Now we make more money than most PL clubs and Spend wisely (Costa and fabregas for the price of selling Luiz) while liverpool are selling Luis suarez for a bunch of Soton players and UTD buying fellini for £28M


If it wasn't for Abramovich, you wouldn't be in a position to spend 30M+ on one player. It's the fact that you had a cash injection to allow you to spend big, whilst clubs like Liverpool, United and Arsenal have built-up their wealth over years and years and years of domestic and European success.
#8619. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
RoyaI wrote
CompleteDesigns wrote
RoyaI wrote
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.


Yeah i agree , I mean its not as if FFP restricts us spending more than we earn is it?

Idiots how can a russian sugersdaddy spend for us when there is FPP?

Your living in the past xD , We had a cash injection to make a team and it lasted for 10 years and won the CL XD.

Now we make more money than most PL clubs and Spend wisely (Costa and fabregas for the price of selling Luiz) while liverpool are selling Luis suarez for a bunch of Soton players and UTD buying fellini for £28M


If it wasn't for Abramovich, you wouldn't be in a position to spend 30M+ on one player. It's the fact that you had a cash injection to allow you to spend big, whilst clubs like Liverpool, United and Arsenal have built-up their wealth over years and years and years of domestic and European success.

S

So what you saying is . We were formed almost overnight with some cash . Yet the other clubs have been building up revenue for years and years and years , And we are still ahead of you all?

Dam no wonder your jealous.
#8620. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
RoyaI wrote
CompleteDesigns wrote
RoyaI wrote
Brad- wrote
Didact wrote I'll talk about your other points also, you say Chelsea have great passion and a backbone? So do Liverpool and Arsenal; we just cannot compete financially with Chelsea.


And why can't you compete financially with us? Because we are smarter in the transfer market, just look at our transfers over the past 2 seasons...


Or because Chelsea have a Russian sugar daddy who floods the club with money. Chelsea were crap 20 years ago.


Yeah i agree , I mean its not as if FFP restricts us spending more than we earn is it?

Idiots how can a russian sugersdaddy spend for us when there is FPP?

Your living in the past xD , We had a cash injection to make a team and it lasted for 10 years and won the CL XD.

Now we make more money than most PL clubs and Spend wisely (Costa and fabregas for the price of selling Luiz) while liverpool are selling Luis suarez for a bunch of Soton players and UTD buying fellini for £28M


If it wasn't for Abramovich, you wouldn't be in a position to spend 30M+ on one player. It's the fact that you had a cash injection to allow you to spend big, whilst clubs like Liverpool, United and Arsenal have built-up their wealth over years and years and years of domestic and European success.


Here

gyazo.com/9e2e336cb161ab16d4f0fc0132860dd7
Users browsing this topic: None
Jump to:


RECENT POSTS

HOT TOPICS