#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,414
Reputation Power: 24458
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,414
Reputation Power: 24458
FoxServices wroter00t wroteBrad_ wrote21 wroter00t wrote pcpartpicker.com/list/7Tn7Bj It's the same panel as the AW3423DW but with no G-Sync, bad I/O, ugly design, and a higher price. Samsung had a year to beat Dell and blew this product for no reason. |
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,963
Reputation Power: 8137
Motto: Discord: @foxservices
Motto: Discord: @foxservices
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,963
Reputation Power: 8137
Motto: Discord: @foxservices
r00t wroteFoxServices wroter00t wroteBrad_ wrote21 wroter00t wrote pcpartpicker.com/list/7Tn7Bj As far as design, IDK, I'd still go with Samsung. I would only use vasa mounts anyway, so I wouldn't see the actual stand. Keeping that in mind, the chin on the Samsung is a little smaller than the dell. I will you that the I/O design is kinda bad. Pricing wise I think the Samsung will be able to drop pretty quickly as most monitors with G-sync are just going to be more expensive bc of the cost of putting that feature on there. - just realized there is a version you can buy without gsync lol If you are looking at buying a monitor now, within the next few months then yeah I'd go with the dell |
- 0useful
- 0not useful
Users browsing this topic: None