Gamers are overreacting to micro-transactions according to analyst

3.4
In the wake of the immense backlash surrounding Star Wars: Battlefront II, one analyst who proclaims to be a gamer himself took - what can be considered - a rather unpopular stance on the matter. In a note to investors, KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst, Evan Wingren explained that the recent outrage was an opportunity for them to add game publishers to their investment portfolios, claiming that gamers were simply 'overreacting'.

Star Wars: Battlefront II has been in the midst of controversy after gamers discovered the game unfairly benefited those who would pay for additional perks and unlockables. This was exacerbated even further after the Star Wars fansite noted that unlocking everything in the game could cost upwards of $2,000 - or over 4,000 hours of game play. EA, however, disputed these claims on Reddit, which unsurprisingly became the single most downvoted comment on the platform. The company has subsequently removed the in-game transactions, albeit temporarily, with the Belgium government initiating an investigation into these practices.

However, Wingren feels that, in his opinion, gamers have been undercharged when it comes to the price of games. According to him, the cost for a video game is still much lower to that of content on a platform like television, when compared to hours enjoyed. He noted that gamers should, in fact, pay more:

“Quantitative analysis shows that video game publishers are actually charging gamers at a relatively inexpensive rate, and should probably raise prices [...] Despite its inconvenience to the popular press narrative, if you like Star Wars and play video games at an average rate, you’re far better off skipping the movie and playing the game to get the most bang for your buck.”


Star Wars: Battlefront II launched on Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC last week, and suffered a 61% drop in sales compared to its predecessor. One can make the assumption that the overzealous use of micro-transactions - and the subsequent outrage - contributed to this in some way. The opinion that gamers are being undercharged is not new, however, if publishers wanted to improve their return on investment, introducing mechanics that skew the game in favor of those with a larger limit on their credit cards might not be the best way to achieve this.

Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: https://www.neowin.net/news/gamers-are-overreacting-to-micro-transactions-according-to-analyst

Comments

"Gamers are overreacting to micro-transactions according to analyst" :: Login/Create an Account :: 19 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

LebronIs6Posted:

thats gotta be the dumbest thing ive ever heard. WOW. LEARN THEN. The fact that all sports games are pay to win, MWR put actual guns in them is mind blowing and breaks the game. Make it cosmetic, THATS IT, thats all it should be. Game publishers need to learn and take BF2 as the example. Hawaii and Belgium law makers are actually looking to ban loot crates because it is looked at as gambling. (I suggest anyone who reads this comment look that up, its actually pretty interesting)

GaryPosted:

I would hardly say people are overreacting. People have gotten fed up with these systems that publishers implement to gouge the players of money and now they are expressing how they feel. Anyone that actually backs micro-transactions of this caliber needs a reality check that not everyone has $100+ to spend on every brand new game.

DecyPosted:

Chat It's not that we're over-reacting it's that they do dumb shit, Cod 4 > we'll only do Cosmetic items ( add guns that are more powerful than regular guns ) that's what we hate lol add Cosmetic stuff all you like I wont complain.


Totally agree... and we have the right to because its not fair at all..

DeftonesPosted:

Cosmetic micro-transactions are somewhat acceptable. However P2W microtransactions are not.

ChatPosted:

It's not that we're over-reacting it's that they do dumb shit, Cod 4 > we'll only do Cosmetic items ( add guns that are more powerful than regular guns ) that's what we hate lol add Cosmetic stuff all you like I wont complain.

junoPosted:

This analyst obviously doesn't understand the average gamer...

JxssePosted:

As long as the micro-transactions stay cosmetic then I don't mind.

AlexPosted:

That analyst is a an idiot then..

AD4MPosted:

Pay to win is terrible of course but I don't mind micro transactions at all if it makes your weapon look mint but when it fires out dildos and kills you 5 seconds quicker than a standard weapon that's when it become ridiculous... Devs will never make gamers happy, everyone seems to take sides over nothing nowadays