The Classes of Battlefield 3 Detailed

4.7
The Battlefield Blog updated a few days ago with some fresh details on Battlefield 3‘s four multiplayer classes: Assault, Engineer, Support and Recon. And yes, that means that the Medic is out.

Instead of having a separate Medic class, abilities such as med packs and defibrillators will be passed onto the Assault class. That doesn’t mean that the class’ assault power will be toned down, though – Assault will remain the standard “run and gun” class.

The Engineer, on the other hand, remains largely unchanged from the Battlefield: Bad Company 2 incarnation. The engineer will repair the team’s vehicles and destroy the other team’s vehicles with RPG fire.

The support class is perhaps the most interesting of the bunch. The support class will sport an LMG, and he’ll have the ability to lay down a bipod on the ground or on other various surfaces, making his shots significantly more accurate which, in turn, makes the class very effective at laying down suppressive fire.

Speaking of suppressive fire, DICE is introducing an interesting new mechanic with Battlefield 3. When you lay down suppressive fire at close vicinity to enemy infantry, the enemy’s screen will blur and his accuracy will be noticeably impacted. This makes laying down suppressive fire to hold positions significantly more effective and, as a fan of all games of the military variety, I could not be more stoked about it.

Last but not least is the Recon class, otherwise known as the sniper. Just like the Battlefield: Bad Company 2 version, the Recon class will be able to spot enemies for the team and take out enemies from a (ideally) safe distance. To mix things up a bit, however, DICE will be introducing several Recon-exclusive gadgets, but they weren’t willing to share any more details on that at the moment.

Battlefield 3 ships out on the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and PC this October 25.

Posted:

Source: http://www.inquisitr.com/124976/all-four-battlefield-3-classes-detailed/

Comments

"The Classes of Battlefield 3 Detailed" :: Login/Create an Account :: 21 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

rayanXxXPosted:

**** engineer !

JoNZooMPosted:

Eagles1000
tBoNe42o
Messiah_O-O
I see barely any progression from cod4 to Mw2... all the same graphics same feel which is what the people want but theres really no progression.


Umm... have you played those GAMES?! CoD4 to MW2... dude you couldn't do half the things in cod4 as you could do in MW2.... "all the same graphics which is what the people want" YES YOU MORON, BECAUSE IF YOU CAN PLAY A GAME THAT IS ONLINE IT SHOULD BE RUN AT 60+FPS TO COMPENSATE FOR BANDWITH LAG. Why would you play a choppy **** game and ALSO account for bullet/shot lag based on your internet connection? That sounds HORRIBLE to me.

It's people like you that only like video games based on what they look like, and not whats in it. Why the hell would you want the graphics to constantly update but the content to still remain dull? Did you even read my other posts?

Ok dude i'm almost certain you're a troll but it if you're not lets set this straight. BF3 runs at 60 FPS on PC and 30 FPS on console due to the scale of the maps and graphical capabilities. The only reason cod can run at 60 is due to the tiny maps and average graphics.Cod 1 was actually hated, cod 2 was enjoyed but there was a lot wrong with it and didn't have much replay ability cod 3 was a bad clone of cod 2, cod 4 was amazing and was loved by all and was what set off the cod series and got it known, cod 5 was a cod 4 WW2 clone with zombies, mw2 changed the menu around and added customizable kill streaks (OMG), black ops was mw2 but patched. Cod has been copying battlefield since it all began and the only ones innovating are battlefield and all cod is doing is copying them. If you were a PC gamer and didn't chat bullshit about counter strike days you would know this. Just because consoles can't keep up with the demands of current games doesn't mean they should hold back on their games (like cod do, also due to them being greedy) I love cod 4 and still play it to this day but battlefield has always been superior. You are just an ignorant fan boy/ troll who is commenting on a battlefield even though he apparently doesn't like it. If you think that adding different kill streaks, weapons and a different skin to the same old game is innovating then you have no **** idea.
lol black ops is mw2 patched HAHAHA if it is then its a bad patch everything about it is less realistic than mw2 and the graphics are far worst :)

Eagles1000Posted:

tBoNe42o
Messiah_O-O
I see barely any progression from cod4 to Mw2... all the same graphics same feel which is what the people want but theres really no progression.


Umm... have you played those GAMES?! CoD4 to MW2... dude you couldn't do half the things in cod4 as you could do in MW2.... "all the same graphics which is what the people want" YES YOU MORON, BECAUSE IF YOU CAN PLAY A GAME THAT IS ONLINE IT SHOULD BE RUN AT 60+FPS TO COMPENSATE FOR BANDWITH LAG. Why would you play a choppy **** game and ALSO account for bullet/shot lag based on your internet connection? That sounds HORRIBLE to me.

It's people like you that only like video games based on what they look like, and not whats in it. Why the hell would you want the graphics to constantly update but the content to still remain dull? Did you even read my other posts?

Ok dude i'm almost certain you're a troll but it if you're not lets set this straight. BF3 runs at 60 FPS on PC and 30 FPS on console due to the scale of the maps and graphical capabilities. The only reason cod can run at 60 is due to the tiny maps and average graphics.Cod 1 was actually hated, cod 2 was enjoyed but there was a lot wrong with it and didn't have much replay ability cod 3 was a bad clone of cod 2, cod 4 was amazing and was loved by all and was what set off the cod series and got it known, cod 5 was a cod 4 WW2 clone with zombies, mw2 changed the menu around and added customizable kill streaks (OMG), black ops was mw2 but patched. Cod has been copying battlefield since it all began and the only ones innovating are battlefield and all cod is doing is copying them. If you were a PC gamer and didn't chat bullshit about counter strike days you would know this. Just because consoles can't keep up with the demands of current games doesn't mean they should hold back on their games (like cod do, also due to them being greedy) I love cod 4 and still play it to this day but battlefield has always been superior. You are just an ignorant fan boy/ troll who is commenting on a battlefield even though he apparently doesn't like it. If you think that adding different kill streaks, weapons and a different skin to the same old game is innovating then you have no **** idea.

tBoNe42oPosted:

Messiah_O-O
I see barely any progression from cod4 to Mw2... all the same graphics same feel which is what the people want but theres really no progression.


Umm... have you played those GAMES?! CoD4 to MW2... dude you couldn't do half the things in cod4 as you could do in MW2.... "all the same graphics which is what the people want" YES YOU MORON, BECAUSE IF YOU CAN PLAY A GAME THAT IS ONLINE IT SHOULD BE RUN AT 60+FPS TO COMPENSATE FOR BANDWITH LAG. Why would you play a choppy ass game and ALSO account for bullet/shot lag based on your internet connection? That sounds HORRIBLE to me.

It's people like you that only like video games based on what they look like, and not whats in it. Why the hell would you want the graphics to constantly update but the content to still remain dull? Did you even read my other posts?

tBoNe42oPosted:

-Frostbite- I'm gonna be very clear about this. Modern Warfare 2 Runs 60 Fps 565p (Near That Number). Battlefield 3 Runs At 30 Fps 720p. They can't do 60 Because of the Gaming Consoles. (It's Not Their Fault They Just Can't)

I'm looking foward to Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3 uses the same engine as Modern Warfare 2.

-Frostbite-

Your excited for a game thats going to run at 30 fps? rofl I remember 10 years ago when I used to play counter-strike @ 30 fps. and people are excited for this game?! rofl

MW3 uses the same engine as MW2 WHY? BECAUSE IT WAS SUCCESSFUL AND EVERYONE LOVED IT. NO GRAPHIC LAG

MesslahPosted:

tBoNe42o COD 1:
ONE OF THE FIRST GAMES THAT BROUGHT GREAT FAST PACED WORLD WAR ACTION

COD 2:
THE BEST WW2 GAME AND THE MOST POPULAR ON 360 FOR 2 YEARS

COD 3:
THE BEGGINING OF THE BEST MULTIPLAYER GAME EVER MADE

COD 4:
INTRODUCTION TO PERKS, CREATING CLASSES ETC. BEST MULTIPLAYER AND SINGLE PLAYER GAME EVER MADE

COD 5:
INTRODUCTION OF NEW KILL STREAKS, STILL ONE OF THE BEST MULTIPLAYER GAMES OF ITS ERA

COD 6:
ONE OF THE MOST COMPLEX VERSIONS TO DATE. CUSTOMIZABLE KILLSTREAKS, CAMOS, EQUIPMENT ETC. ETC.

COD 7:
INTRO TO CUSTOMIZABLE EMBLEMS, PLAYERCARDS, CAMOS, AND STILL AFTER THE 7TH RELEASE HAS NOT EVEN REACHED IT'S PEAK OF POPULARITY!!!

Can you even believe that a series that has gone this long is still the number one king of all video games ever MADE?! I mean c'mon. There is not other game that has progressed so good and with such excellence...


I see barely any progression from cod4 to Mw2... all the same graphics same feel which is what the people want but theres really no progression.

-Frostbite-Posted:

I'm gonna be very clear about this. Modern Warfare 2 Runs 60 Fps 565p (Near That Number). Battlefield 3 Runs At 30 Fps 720p. They can't do 60 Because of the Gaming Consoles. (It's Not Their Fault They Just Can't)

I'm looking foward to Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3 uses the same engine as Modern Warfare 2.

-Frostbite-

tBoNe42oPosted:

COD 1:
ONE OF THE FIRST GAMES THAT BROUGHT GREAT FAST PACED WORLD WAR ACTION

COD 2:
THE BEST WW2 GAME AND THE MOST POPULAR ON 360 FOR 2 YEARS

COD 3:
THE BEGGINING OF THE BEST MULTIPLAYER GAME EVER MADE

COD 4:
INTRODUCTION TO PERKS, CREATING CLASSES ETC. BEST MULTIPLAYER AND SINGLE PLAYER GAME EVER MADE

COD 5:
INTRODUCTION OF NEW KILL STREAKS, STILL ONE OF THE BEST MULTIPLAYER GAMES OF ITS ERA

COD 6:
ONE OF THE MOST COMPLEX VERSIONS TO DATE. CUSTOMIZABLE KILLSTREAKS, CAMOS, EQUIPMENT ETC. ETC.

COD 7:
INTRO TO CUSTOMIZABLE EMBLEMS, PLAYERCARDS, CAMOS, AND STILL AFTER THE 7TH RELEASE HAS NOT EVEN REACHED IT'S PEAK OF POPULARITY!!!

Can you even believe that a series that has gone this long is still the number one king of all video games ever MADE?! I mean c'mon. There is not other game that has progressed so good and with such excellence...

tBoNe42oPosted:

BF2 CLASSES:
ANTI-TANK
ASSAULT
ENGINEER
MEDIC
SNIPER
SPEC-OPS
SUPPORT

BF3 CLASSES:
ASSAULT
RECON
SUPPORT
ENGINEER

GAMEPLAY FOR BOTH:
THE EXACT SAME SINCE BATTLEFIELD 1942

WILL PEOPLE BUY IT?
OFCOURSE

WILL PEOPLE PLAY IT FOR A LONG TIME?
UMM NO. REDUNDANT OLD GAMEPLAY THAT IS NOT FAST PACED

tBoNe42oPosted:

Ambicidal
tBoNe42o I love how people are so hyped up on a game that has NEVER changed and it's only going to run at 30 fps.... lol I also find it amusing how DICE thinks this game is going to be better than MW3....

i find it amusing that people like you have no idea what their talking about.


Hahahaha, just check out this link you stupid Battlefield fanboy. http://thetechgame.org/news/battlefield-3-30-fps-on-ps3-and-xbox-360/

I played for Cal-I on 2 (YES, TWO) of the top 10 teams of Battlefield 2 for PC. You don't think I know what I'm talking about? These are the exact same classes they used minus spec ops class. I'm not saying this release is going to suck but they have no idea what they are talking about when they say that this game will be better than MW3. This game probably won't even be better than Black Ops, and that's a slap in the face.