Battlefield 3: Authentic, Fun, Non-Controversial

4.5
Battlefield 3 executive producer Patrick Bach tells us that taking on Call Of Duty won’t mean compromising Battlefield tradition, and explains why the title’s authentic tone is married to an intentionally fantastical plot.

There’s a fear among Battlefield fans that the singleplayer will look towards the strictly linear action of COD. Can you allay those fears at all?
In a way I do understand, and in another way I don’t. Most people that hate singleplayer are the ones that love multiplayer. That’s fine - you don’t have to play it! We want the product to cater for the people who do like singleplayer and also the people who like multiplayer - and we are adding co-op, too - trying to fill the gaps all the way from the hardcore full-on Conquest mode, to the narrative-driven singleplayer. People just have to understand that we aren’t taking people away from one thing or the other. We’re just making the product bigger.

There’s a clear tonal shift away from the humour of Bad Company here.
Now we are going back to the core series, we’re throwing away everything that has to do with the tone of the Bad Company series, and creating a completely new tone and narrative based on the more authentic focus we had of Battlefield 2.

So what were the touchstones - Generation Kill, presumably?
There were plenty of influences. Generation Kill, obviously. Everyone likes Black Hawk Down. We’re looking more towards the more authentic Hollywood movies, rather than Transformers. Andy McNab has been working with us for quite some time now, talking to our writers about authenticity when it comes to mission structures. And he’s been involved in motion capture; since he’s been involved in, for instance, the movie Heat, consulting on gun handling matters, he knows what it takes to make his experience fit onto an entertainment product.

We’re selling fun, and he doesn’t come from fun, but he understands the connection between his experience and the fantasy that we want people to live through our game. He’s a really, really nice guy, and extremely useful to the animator. He knows everything from the fire rate of any particular gun to what mortars actually sound like depending on the propellant you use - there are so many details he knows about. We have some gun nuts here in the office, but they were like, wow, this guy knows his shit.

The plot of Battlefield 3 sees Russia invading France, and there are US troops on the ground. You aren’t saying much about the story yet, but can you give us the geopolitical context for the game’s narrative?
First of all: it’s fiction. We’re not trying to base it on any political or religious conflict - controversy is probably a good marketing tool, but we make games. Our goal isn’t to make controversy. I don’t want people to feel bad playing our game. Our goal is to create a fun, entertaining experience. So we are trying to stay away from things that are real - authentic and real don’t have to be the same thing.

So, with authenticity in mind, we won’t see cackling Russian supervillains?
No, no supervillains. But you still want your enemy to be clear; you still want your player character to have a clear motivation - that’s something we’re working on to find the right balance.

As creatives involved in the depiction of war, do you feel you have a duty to show the moral context of war?
Since we are Swedes, we are neutral on paper. We have a tendency to not take sides. I think that reflects in our games. When we say Russians versus Americans, it’s like Red versus Blue. We try not to depict the reasons for the war, because then it can end up in a very bad place. We depict it from the perspective of an individual rather than an army - it’s about you as a soldier on the battlefield, because no matter who you are or on what side you are, it’s still drama. I don’t want to create a war simulation or a game which picks sides. I think that would be tasteless.

This interview was conducted as part of our Battlefield 3 preview, printed in this month's issue of Edge, out now.

Posted:

Source: http://www.next-gen.biz/features/dice-battlefield-3s-new-direction

Comments

"Battlefield 3: Authentic, Fun, Non-Controversial" :: Login/Create an Account :: 14 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

Mratomicbomb66Posted:

Sayersy
0nslaught
DecyferGaming It's time BF3 takes over. I mean Cod is getting OLD and BORING and all they do is add a new storyline, maps and weapons. It's just too predictable. I love Battlefield, because it's actually what you call a competitive game of realism and people can actually work as a Team. Looking forward to their new engine too.

Totally agree with you, BF3 will be better than MW3, because in Battlefield you have to work as a team, you can't pull some bullshit like a 1v5 clutch like in MW2 cuz you'll lose every time. You have to work as a team and if you do it will be the most fun you'll ever have


"Oh great, my team mates are dead therefore I have no chance at doing well myself. I'M HAVING SO MUCH FUN!"

Lawlz at that last comment! But in BF2 when your teammates died you could still survive but you had a hard time at it. But it's perfectly probable to 1v5 in real life. If you were stealthy or a BA then it could work. Each game is good, no need to bad talk either of them. And if you want a real teamwork game, get on the computer.

SayersyPosted:

0nslaught
DecyferGaming It's time BF3 takes over. I mean Cod is getting OLD and BORING and all they do is add a new storyline, maps and weapons. It's just too predictable. I love Battlefield, because it's actually what you call a competitive game of realism and people can actually work as a Team. Looking forward to their new engine too.

Totally agree with you, BF3 will be better than MW3, because in Battlefield you have to work as a team, you can't pull some bullshit like a 1v5 clutch like in MW2 cuz you'll lose every time. You have to work as a team and if you do it will be the most fun you'll ever have


"Oh great, my team mates are dead therefore I have no chance at doing well myself. I'M HAVING SO MUCH FUN!"

0nslaughtPosted:

DecyferGaming It's time BF3 takes over. I mean Cod is getting OLD and BORING and all they do is add a new storyline, maps and weapons. It's just too predictable. I love Battlefield, because it's actually what you call a competitive game of realism and people can actually work as a Team. Looking forward to their new engine too.

Totally agree with you, BF3 will be better than MW3, because in Battlefield you have to work as a team, you can't pull some bullshit like a 1v5 clutch like in MW2 cuz you'll lose every time. You have to work as a team and if you do it will be the most fun you'll ever have

DecyferGamingPosted:

It's time BF3 takes over. I mean Cod is getting OLD and BORING and all they do is add a new storyline, maps and weapons. It's just too predictable. I love Battlefield, because it's actually what you call a competitive game of realism and people can actually work as a Team. Looking forward to their new engine too.

ZBrushPosted:

luvdathuglyfe
Halo4
-CoD- Played this at E3, about as fast paste as BFBC2, so boring to me.
hmm...I don't believe you since you said it's boring and your username is -CoD-.. Maybe since BF3 is Mw3's Competition?

It's time to realize that COD has had it's run and BF3 will take it out..

defenitly agree with you COD did have its very profitable run but it has been getting boring lately and i believe its time for BF to get the throne


This is because COD is a run n gunner that's fast paced.

Battlefield was made to be competitive, slightly realistic,fun,team based and Different.

triksta2k11Posted:

I am still going to be getting both but I just hope to God that MW3 will actually be worth playing this year!
We all know that BF3 will be great but lets just pray that MW3 will be too.

AmbicidalPosted:

CoD had a good run. Now its Battlefield's turn to kick some A$$.

thomazPosted:

BF3 is going to be amazing. Can't wait, and if it's incredible enough to fit my needs then, I won't get MW3. But the engine has already boggled my mind so I don't believe I will be getting MW3 this year.

xXArcSineXxPosted:

xIVIcMuFFiiNx I love Call of Duty and everything but I think that BF3 will be the dominate of the two. I agree with other people that CoD has been getting boring lately but that might just be because of Treyarch and it's fail of a game Whack Ops.
hi

NaturallyHatedPosted:

I love Call of Duty and everything but I think that BF3 will be the dominate of the two. I agree with other people that CoD has been getting boring lately but that might just be because of Treyarch and it's fail of a game Whack Ops.