EA: Battlefield 3 multiplayer will keep players coming back despite MW3 launch

4.2
While he neglected to sling any specific mud at Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, EA executive vice president Patrick Soderlund believes that Battlefield 3 multiplayer will make players "feel loyal" to the game, even in the face of Activision's annual juggernaut. "We all respect what Call of Duty brings and what they're going to come with," Soderlund recently told IGN, though he believes EA has "an industry-leading multiplayer game that will make people want to stay with us, frankly."

Soderlund sees Battlefield 3's multiplayer as a service that allows players to "continually get updates and new content and hopefully improvements to the product as we go." One such piece of content will be this December's "Back to Karkand" DLC, which Soderlund promises will contain more destruction than the current multiplayer maps. "It's a different level, even more so than in BF3," he said, adding that the DLC team made a "deliberate decision" to ratchet up the destruction for the upcoming content. Sounds like fun, so long as it doesn't destroy the servers too.

Posted:

Source: http://www.joystiq.com/2011/11/02/ea-battlefield-multiplayer-will-keep-players-coming-back-despit/#comments

Comments

"EA: Battlefield 3 multiplayer will keep players coming back despite MW3 launch" :: Login/Create an Account :: 22 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

AbysmalPosted:

Alright I've gotta reply.
As much as I played BF3 'til this point(rank 145 on leaderboards), I can say it's one of the most boring FPS games I've played. I won't be playing it for much longer, at this point I just mess around with classes and try to have fun, but it usually never comes. A week from now, it'll probably just be gathering dust.

UnboundxSovietPosted:

I got to say that Battlefield is mainly a multiplayer game. The campaign is alright, but that is where I give Call of Duty credit. I just don't like the rinsed out multiplayer IW or Treyarch offer us every year. They just tweak it a little.

Miracl3pwnzPosted:

Not really , Bad Company was more campaign then multiplayer. They went back to Battlefield 2 for the multiplayer. Get your shit right. BUT im only getting cod ...atm. Kinda broke and can only afford the MW3 instead of BF3

StaxPosted:

BF3 is like a map pack to Bad Company. they just added a few new guns and maps. much like you guys are saying mw3 is like a map pack to mw2. well so is bf3 so shut the f*ck up.

NetflixPosted:

Inception20
iheartgow3 cuz we all know MW3 will be sh*t no questions asked :) only a god d*mn moron will buy that game. BF3 FOR LIFE.
You make all gears players look bad...
I love both games...no need to hate on one. Congradulations BF3 for such a kick-ass game! :D

Inception20Posted:

iheartgow3 cuz we all know MW3 will be sh*t no questions asked :) only a god d*mn moron will buy that game. BF3 FOR LIFE.
You make all gears players look bad...

TheLunaticPosted:

iheartgow3 cuz we all know MW3 will be sh*t no questions asked :) only a god d*mn moron will buy that game. BF3 FOR LIFE.

you're **** stup1d gtfo and yes the one's are supposed to be I's

Noah-Posted:

Human played it first time yesterday, slightly disappointed.
i hope you dont mean bf3 because it is amazing

LetsgooutsidePosted:

jayjay92895
bio4azard
gokuss2 battlefield sucked and MW3 will win it all

Mw3 is basically just a map pack to MW2, i mean seriously the only thing they changed was the way the classes worked.
wow your sooo dumb lol "the only thing they changed was the way the classes worked" you made yourself loookk sooo stupid
Haha you look just as stupid, its You're* bro

MightyMitchPosted:

jayjay92895
bio4azard
gokuss2 battlefield sucked and MW3 will win it all

Mw3 is basically just a map pack to MW2, i mean seriously the only thing they changed was the way the classes worked.
wow your sooo dumb lol "the only thing they changed was the way the classes worked" you made yourself loookk sooo stupid


he didnt look that dumb