Treyarch Hiring For ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops 2?’

3.4
In what will come as likely a shock to nobody, it looks like Treyarch is back at work, hiring programmers for their next Call of Duty title. What may come as a bit of news to fans is that apparently, it looks like the game in question will not be merely another entry into the series, but Black Ops 2, a direct sequel to their best-selling game of all time.That’s according to ThatVideoGameBlog, who are claiming that the latest issue of OPMUK is dropping a sizable number of hints that Treyarch is not only staffing up for their next inevitable CoD title, but that it’s seeming more and more likely that the game will be a direct sequel to Black Ops.

We’ve known that there was a likelihood that a sequel was in the works for some time, with Treyarch posting job openings in March, and a Community Manager confirming that a Black Ops sequel was possible in the studio’s future. The fact of the matter is that Activision and Treyarch would have to be out of their minds to not be planning a sequel to the game, given its record-shattering sales.

But while the game itself is a foregone conclusion, whether it will be a continuation of the first game’s plot or merely give another dose of the cinematic presentation and new mechanics of Black Ops is anyone’s guess. Without a doubt, the biggest surprise in all of this news is just how far off many predictions were in the wake of the Infinity Ward/Activision split.

Some expected that Treyarch – perhaps unfairly known as the makers of ‘inferior’ CoD titles – would absolutely bomb on Black Ops, due to inferior gameplay and fan backlash over Activision’s legal drama with Modern Warfare developer Infinity Ward. But the opposite took place, with Treyarch delivering the highest-grossing title in the history of the series, and Modern Warfare 3 grabbing headlines already, even without the studio’s founders on board.


Given the mass exodus of employees from Infinity Ward, and regardless of how you may feel about Activision’s way of doing business, or the quality of Black Ops, the fact is that Treyarch is now the most experienced studio currently working on the Call of Duty brand. And no matter how the games turn out, it is seeming more and more likely that both 2011 and 2012 will be seeing the release of a new CoD installment.

Posted:

Source: http://gamerant.com/treyarch-hiring-call-duty-black-ops-2-dyce-83929/

Comments

"Treyarch Hiring For ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops 2?’" :: Login/Create an Account :: 163 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

Little_MonsterPosted:

Call of Duty Black Ops 2?

The only reason I love Treyarch is for their amazing Campaign and Nazi Zombies.

WaW's campaign was obviously better than Black Ops' of course.

Modern Warfare has a good campaign but it takes 3 damn games just to finish it. That's the only thing good in Call of Duty now a days. Multiplayer is shit, it was good in COD4 and WaW but in MW2 and MW3? 12 year olds and 40 year olds raging like crap. When is Halo 4 coming out? I miss the Halo days.

TakenchancePosted:

aimiami12
-xBeY- In my opinion all they need to do is go back to the basics, forget all this pro perk and killstreak shite. Make classic 3,5,7 killstreaks, after all the old call of duty's made all the fan base, and now people are just buying it because it is called 'call of Duty'. I know someone will say 'it's not all about multiplayer', but im afraid it is.

I enjoy playing WaW and CoD4 as they have different weapons, diffrent designs and they were SIMPLE. All the new cods are just the same shxt diffrent game.

Also, i enjoy playing waw becuase quickscoping was virtually non-existent and cod4 it was not a problem. BUT, on mw2 is was IMPOSSIBLE to find a S&d game were there was no dumb quickscopers making montages thinking they were called grizz.

An extra point is that on cod4/waw all guns had advantages and disadvantages which made it a fair game but with MW3 there are those guns that are '3in1' in a sense they can snipe, kill in 1 bullet and their general purpose.

Another thing that made me play CoD4 was the private match glitching aspect, chuck old school on and you can get out of nearly every map, elevators etc. Then you go online and they were next to impossible and if you were able to do the glitch the location of them on the map made it pointless.

Sounds sad but i have been playing CoD on console since the 3rd one and they are getting worse every release, and i can assure you that anyone else in my boat would agree.
we can only wish, so many people would be against that. I agree with you though, that was better and thats why cod 4 is the best.


You make sense. COD4 and W@W were the best. Everything was great with them. The only thing I don't agree on is he Kill streaks. MW2 Kill streaks were good. but they encouraged Camping. But they should be like that.
And for QS, there is nothing you can do about that...But they need to go back to the basics.

aimiami12Posted:

DecyferGaming
iJarH3ad
DeadlyDasher Treyarch > IW.

IW dumbs down their game for the 14 year olds, and makes it too easy for bad players to do good. They also make their games to damn unbalanced. But appearently all those things = a good game for most people.

Cod 4 > WaW > Black Ops > MW2

MW3 hasn't been out long enough to put it anywhere, and if anyone says MW3 is better then any COD game after about 18 days of it being out is ignorant.


Not going to lie, Treyarch is the worst studio game design in the history. They don't know what they're doing.

Can't you understand how crappy graphic is from black ops?

Impossible to kill someone when you're using chopper.

Fail respawn.

Fail guns..

And on....


Lol first of all Treyarch started the cod Franchise with Call of Duty Finest Hour and they will remain the best Studio. Not every game is going to be success but to say ''they don't know what they are doing'' and ''worst studio'' you would have to be a complete and utter ****. If it wasn't for them, you wouldn't be playing COD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty#Call_of_Duty
im pretty sure infinity ward is the reason cod is where it is

aimiami12Posted:

DecyferGaming
iJarH3ad
DeadlyDasher Treyarch > IW.

IW dumbs down their game for the 14 year olds, and makes it too easy for bad players to do good. They also make their games to damn unbalanced. But appearently all those things = a good game for most people.

Cod 4 > WaW > Black Ops > MW2

MW3 hasn't been out long enough to put it anywhere, and if anyone says MW3 is better then any COD game after about 18 days of it being out is ignorant.


Not going to lie, Treyarch is the worst studio game design in the history. They don't know what they're doing.

Can't you understand how crappy graphic is from black ops?

Impossible to kill someone when you're using chopper.

Fail respawn.

Fail guns..

And on....


Lol first of all Treyarch started the cod Franchise with Call of Duty Finest Hour and they will remain the best Studio. Not every game is going to be success but to say ''they don't know what they are doing'' and ''worst studio'' you would have to be a complete and utter ****. If it wasn't for them, you wouldn't be playing COD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty#Call_of_Duty
im pretty sure infinity ward is the reason cod is where it is

DecyferGamingPosted:

iJarH3ad
DeadlyDasher Treyarch > IW.

IW dumbs down their game for the 14 year olds, and makes it too easy for bad players to do good. They also make their games to damn unbalanced. But appearently all those things = a good game for most people.

Cod 4 > WaW > Black Ops > MW2

MW3 hasn't been out long enough to put it anywhere, and if anyone says MW3 is better then any COD game after about 18 days of it being out is ignorant.


Not going to lie, Treyarch is the worst studio game design in the history. They don't know what they're doing.

Can't you understand how crappy graphic is from black ops?

Impossible to kill someone when you're using chopper.

Fail respawn.

Fail guns..

And on....


Lol first of all Treyarch started the cod Franchise with Call of Duty Finest Hour and they will remain the best Studio. Not every game is going to be success but to say ''they don't know what they are doing'' and ''worst studio'' you would have to be a complete and utter retard. If it wasn't for them, you wouldn't be playing COD.

aimiami12Posted:

-xBeY- In my opinion all they need to do is go back to the basics, forget all this pro perk and killstreak shite. Make classic 3,5,7 killstreaks, after all the old call of duty's made all the fan base, and now people are just buying it because it is called 'call of Duty'. I know someone will say 'it's not all about multiplayer', but im afraid it is.

I enjoy playing WaW and CoD4 as they have different weapons, diffrent designs and they were SIMPLE. All the new cods are just the same shxt diffrent game.

Also, i enjoy playing waw becuase quickscoping was virtually non-existent and cod4 it was not a problem. BUT, on mw2 is was IMPOSSIBLE to find a S&d game were there was no dumb quickscopers making montages thinking they were called grizz.

An extra point is that on cod4/waw all guns had advantages and disadvantages which made it a fair game but with MW3 there are those guns that are '3in1' in a sense they can snipe, kill in 1 bullet and their general purpose.

Another thing that made me play CoD4 was the private match glitching aspect, chuck old school on and you can get out of nearly every map, elevators etc. Then you go online and they were next to impossible and if you were able to do the glitch the location of them on the map made it pointless.

Sounds sad but i have been playing CoD on console since the 3rd one and they are getting worse every release, and i can assure you that anyone else in my boat would agree.
we can only wish, so many people would be against that. I agree with you though, that was better and thats why cod 4 is the best.

-OHiO-Posted:

Jamy
Jamy
triksta2k11
Messi-10 Screw Black Ops. Do what you did best.
That was WaW. World at War is the best and most realistic cod game ever made.

World at War was by far my favourite CoD. I hope they do this also!

LOL @ "Realistic COD" :facepalm:

BTW Inb4 people say that im a Battlefield fanboy as don't think BF3 is realistic it is a mix of Arcade and Semi-Realistic if you want to play something realistic go and play ARMA 2

World At War was better than any call of duty or battlefield. if you say it wasnt realistic, thats because its 5 years old. it was the funnest game to play with friends, now games suck, they are the same every year.

JamyPosted:

Jamy
triksta2k11
Messi-10 Screw Black Ops. Do what you did best.
That was WaW. World at War is the best and most realistic cod game ever made.

World at War was by far my favourite CoD. I hope they do this also!

LOL @ "Realistic COD" :facepalm:

BTW Inb4 people say that im a Battlefield fanboy as don't think BF3 is realistic it is a mix of Arcade and Semi-Realistic if you want to play something realistic go and play ARMA 2

JamyPosted:

triksta2k11
Messi-10 Screw Black Ops. Do what you did best.
That was WaW. World at War is the best and most realistic cod game ever made.

World at War was by far my favourite CoD. I hope they do this also!

LOL @ "Realistic COD" :facepalm:

xMrGnomePosted:

Battlefield 3....





:L