Halo 4 Multiplayer Introduces Perks, 343i Assures "Halo’s not Call of Duty"

4.7
Earlier today, 343 Industries gave Halo fans and inside look at the upcoming sequel, Halo 4. If you missed it, you can check it out right here. Not only did we get to see how the campaign is shaping up, but we also got our first glimpse at Halo 4′s multiplayer.

With the exception of the fact that maps are being developed with the competitive audience in mind, that the Battlerifle will be making a return and that the multiplayer will be more connected to the lore of Halo, much info has yet to be revealed. Luckily, Eurogamer was able to learn an interesting fact: Halo 4′s multiplayer will introduce a system similar to Call of Duty’s perks and Battlefield’s specializations. It has been revealed that players will be able to fully customize their Spartan IV’s armor, much like previous Halo titles, but which will now directly affect the gameplay.

This is obviously a fairly drastic change to the already well-established Halo-style gameplay. Franchise Director, Frank O’Connor admits, “I expect a variety of different reactions.” However, he made it clear, “we’ve a tremendous amount of respect for Bungie and for the universe that they created, and yet we do want to take our own unique view on Halo and on where we want to take the franchise is in the future. It’s about finding the balance so it’s still Halo yet still feels fresh.”

Apparently, this isn’t the only thing that may trigger some passionate reactions among the community. ”What we showed today is in some ways really traditional. Some of the more revolutionary stuff that we’re going to be doing is going to create more fuss, and I think it’s going to be mostly positive fuss, as it’s all been carefully thought out and considered.”

So far, the reactions to this new gameplay mechanic have been accusatory of 343 Industries essentially copying the gameplay of shooters like Call of Duty and Battlefield. O’Connor assures, “what we do take very seriously is changing player habits. So rather than chasing Call of Duty or Battlefield and trying to do their thing and doing it poorly and doing injustice to it, we’re trying to do our own thing, and do something fairly original but still something that’s completely compatible with the Halo universe.” He continued, “Halo’s not Call of Duty. Halo’s a sandbox game about really emergent things. A lot of things that worked great about Call of Duty – and don’t get me wrong, I was addicted Black Ops all of last year – they do player rewards really well. We’re not trying to do the same thing, it’s as simple as that. We’re trying to do something else, and to push our game forwards and not theirs.”

What O’Connor seems to be trying to push to fans is that 343 Industries is ”not chasing anybody else’s tail – all the pressure comes from inside.”

Posted:

Source: http://mp1st.com/2012/03/05/halo-4-multiplayer-introduces-perks-343i-assures-halos-not-call-of-duty/

Comments

"Halo 4 Multiplayer Introduces Perks, 343i Assures "Halo’s not Call of Duty"" :: Login/Create an Account :: 86 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

TTGxMODD3RSv2Posted:

i dont like halo atall ithink it sucks

AsPaPuLcEPosted:

3OH3
WPSpy
3OH3
Zaragoza
3OH3
Zaragoza I feel like this is going to be the worst halo yet. They are trying too hard, all they need is a simple remake of halo 3 but with diff. guns, maps and campaign...


That's a joke right? That's exactly what call of duty does which is completely retarded. It's an entire new game so might as well make it one.

Copy and paste games are trash... Just like call of duty has become.

So you are saying that halo reach is a good game because they added jet packs and other gay add ons and the stupid guns they added. Like i said, i want a remake of Halo 3, this is my opinion, if i wanted yours i would've asked. And frankly i think the call of duties way better than Halo Reach. I would choose the play viva pinata over halo reach. That is the worst game out. And next is halo 4.

I own both viva pinata and Halo Reach and I can say that I'd rather play Reach....lol
And I thought that Halo Reach was different and added a new aspect to the game. The jetpacks and other perks added many more options when making custom games and made you think a little more in the multiplayer. I personally didn't think it was all that bad.


are you serious? Halo reach was a complete failure.. Even though call of duty keeps doing the same thing over and over, its sales keep increasing drastically every year. Halo Reach, however failed .. probably because they attempted to add new things that halo fans didn't like. personally halo 3 was the best game on xbox.. and a remake with very few changes would be just fine.
I never said I didn't like Halo 3. It's easily my favorite game... I'm just saying that I'm always up for something new

I'd rather have a game that is a guarantee of being good instead of being like reach.

BulletOnABiscutPosted:

I would like to see how this plays out. I'm wary about the whole "perks" thing, because I feel that makes a game unbalanced or at least harder to balance. I don't want to lose a gunfight because someone else has a better perk set-up for that given situation. The greatest thing about Halo 2&3 is that the better player won the gunfight. That's it. You knew that if you had a BR, and they had a BR, the better person would come out alive. The skill level between players was evident, which I guess made it not "noob friendly". If you sucked at the game, you actually had to WORK to get better. I hope Halo 4 follows the same path, and that when I'm fighting someone, I won't have to worry about what stupid perks they have, but whether or not they are nasty with the rifle.

67891Posted:

mini2365 they'll copy quickscoping... I hope.

Dude that would ruin the game with 10 year olds trying to play it like COD

Two_FacedPosted:

liqour_man
TTG_Crysis
POLYSICS
liqour_man
Jacob8hockey
TTG_Crysis Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared Just FYI almost no one was good enough to get a 50 in halo 2 I was a quarter moon(46) I think and I was in the top 200 people in the world GT: M A T A D O R so if you were a 50 in halo 3 Wich was pretty easy to get if you played with a team, you wOuld barely be a 40 in halo 2.

liqour_manPosted:

TTG_Crysis
POLYSICS
liqour_man
Jacob8hockey
TTG_Crysis Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared to Reach. The graphics are 1.5x better in Reach, they made the guns more balanced and interesting, forge was fixed, added abilitys, better servers, etc, etc and etc. This WASN'T a copy and paste game like Call of Duty, it was pretty much built from scratch, unlike Call of Duty where they just make new gun skins, new maps, and thats it. The only reason i don't play reach anymore is because no one on my friends list plays it, if more played it i would be happy to play it.

You definetly did not play Halo 3 when it came out. It is beyond amazing compared to what it was able to bring into games back in 2007. You can't say Halo 3 sucks, it was by far one of the best games created. Clearly you got Reach before Halo 3.
wow...I was going to say that to him. Nicely put btw, I doubt he played halo 3 or 2 before reach and if he did he didn't play it enough or stopped playing it because he couldn't get a 50. So he likes reach because you can be bad and it wouldnt even be noticed in reach because their I'd nor ranks.
I like how he thinks graphics make a game 10x better. I still play **** NES and N64 for christ's sake and the games on there are better than half the games made today.

You obviously DID NOT play Halo 3 before Reach, or probably not even any of the older games when they came out. To refute your rating statement, Halo 3 did not get a 9.8/10 for no reason; Halo 3 infinitely better than Reach. You probably just could never rank up in Halo 3, and because people out BR'd you. Just because you can't sprint away or make yourself invincible in the middle of a confrontation doesn't mean the game is bad. Graphics don't mean ****.
You think i didnt play Halo 3 before i had Reach? Halo 3 was my first Xbox 360 game and all i had for a while. And i didn't say it was all about graphics either. And i never said Halo 3 sucked overall, just compared to a title like Reach it does. Yes Halo 3 was a great game, but Reach is the ultimate victor in this argument. If i took 100 random kids in the world and asked Halo 3 or Reach , 65% and + would say Reach. Just because it has armor abilites doesn't make it a bad game, it made it BETTER! Just because you idiots dont know how to counter armor lock doesn't mean you have to hate the title? When Halo 4 comes out, everyone that radded on Reach will move over to 4 and find its flaws and rad about how much better Reach was than Halo 4 because thats what trolls do, they troll.
LOL "65% would choose Reach" Before Reach came out Halo 3 had an average of 400 to 500k of people on EVERYDAY. The average amount of people who play Reach is roughly 100 to 125k....Drastic change in population amount huh? And also you did make a comment about the graphics retard. Just because you like Reach because there is no ranking system which means no one will know whether you are good or bad. Halo Reach is a noob friendly game, they knew people who were bad at H2 and H3 who couldnt get a 50 raged out of the game so they had to make it noob friendly and put in a shtty ranking system like COD that does'nt show if a player is good or not but yet shows who plays the most.

TTG_CrysisPosted:

POLYSICS
liqour_man
Jacob8hockey
TTG_Crysis Haha lol all you kids rad on Halo Reach like its an unplayable title or something. It didn't get a 9.5/10 rating for a reason. Halo 3 sucked in my opinion compared to Reach. The graphics are 1.5x better in Reach, they made the guns more balanced and interesting, forge was fixed, added abilitys, better servers, etc, etc and etc. This WASN'T a copy and paste game like Call of Duty, it was pretty much built from scratch, unlike Call of Duty where they just make new gun skins, new maps, and thats it. The only reason i don't play reach anymore is because no one on my friends list plays it, if more played it i would be happy to play it.

You definetly did not play Halo 3 when it came out. It is beyond amazing compared to what it was able to bring into games back in 2007. You can't say Halo 3 sucks, it was by far one of the best games created. Clearly you got Reach before Halo 3.
wow...I was going to say that to him. Nicely put btw, I doubt he played halo 3 or 2 before reach and if he did he didn't play it enough or stopped playing it because he couldn't get a 50. So he likes reach because you can be bad and it wouldnt even be noticed in reach because their I'd nor ranks.
I like how he thinks graphics make a game 10x better. I still play **** NES and N64 for christ's sake and the games on there are better than half the games made today.

You obviously DID NOT play Halo 3 before Reach, or probably not even any of the older games when they came out. To refute your rating statement, Halo 3 did not get a 9.8/10 for no reason; Halo 3 infinitely better than Reach. You probably just could never rank up in Halo 3, and because people out BR'd you. Just because you can't sprint away or make yourself invincible in the middle of a confrontation doesn't mean the game is bad. Graphics don't mean ****.
You think i didnt play Halo 3 before i had Reach? Halo 3 was my first Xbox 360 game and all i had for a while. And i didn't say it was all about graphics either. And i never said Halo 3 sucked overall, just compared to a title like Reach it does. Yes Halo 3 was a great game, but Reach is the ultimate victor in this argument. If i took 100 random kids in the world and asked Halo 3 or Reach , 65% and + would say Reach. Just because it has armor abilites doesn't make it a bad game, it made it BETTER! Just because you idiots dont know how to counter armor lock doesn't mean you have to hate the title? When Halo 4 comes out, everyone that radded on Reach will move over to 4 and find its flaws and rad about how much better Reach was than Halo 4 because thats what trolls do, they troll.

gokuss2Posted:

PLEASE DEAR GOD DONT BE LIKE HALO REACH!!!! PLEASE GET RID OF ARMOUR LOCK AND JETPACK!!!! PLEASSSSSSSE!

Two_FacedPosted:

I hope this game is more like Halo 2, Halo 2 was so addicting! I hope they have BXR, BXB, double shot, and all those glitches that made it so competitive! Especially super bounces! Ya HEARD Me.

Two_FacedPosted:

I hope this game is more like Halo 2, Halo 2 was so addicting! I hope they have BXR, BXB, double shot, and all those glitches that made it so competitive! Especially super bounces! Ya HEARD Me.