if it goes too futuristic , it will be like halo..

New outcomes for campaign? Sweet.

Not liking all this futuristic stuff, Think it's just going to be another year on Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2 seeing as all the others have sucked.

tport i like how he said its the first call of duty that takes place in the future even though cod 4 took place in 2013 but ya know thats not the future even though the game came out in 2007 so 2013 was definitely the future way to go thats how you can tell activision doesnt give a **** about the games that come out with their name printed on the cover they just care about the money

Someday you will learn that they will say anything to sell their title.

It looks good, stop complaining

Human

John_US

tport i like how he said its the first call of duty that takes place in the future even though cod 4 took place in 2013 but ya know thats not the future even though the game came out in 2007 so 2013 was definitely the future way to go thats how you can tell activision doesnt give a **** about the games that come out with their name printed on the cover they just care about the money

Wow. The fact that you can infer such a harsh and definitive title towards a great company, and just following know-nothing stereotypes, is quite insane. If you look at Cod 4, Cod 4 is set in the future, but does integrate any real futuristic aspects into the MP, and lurking into the distant future. Laser Red Dot Sights, of course, but this wasn't futuristic at the time. Black Ops 2 is the first Cod that will integrate futuristic gameplay, into the game. Whether or not he made a mistake in pointing this out, it doesn't matter. OK, he made an error, and from that you assume that all they care about is money. Did you know that Black Ops 2 has over 300 workers developing the game, more than any other Cod game? More jobs = less money, and so what if they can afford it, they are still working on putting more into the game. How you can compile that assumption from either a simple mistake, or actually inferring what is right, is just funny to me. This demonstrates not in one bit how Activision is money stealing, and selfish.

Stop trying to use big words, it makes you sound the opposite of what you want to sound like.
And by the way, red dot sights are available now... and laser sights.
DeadlyDasher robotic tanks and vehicles seem too futuristic for 13 years to me

You do know we have thousands of unmanned aircraft in the military right ?

John_US

tport i like how he said its the first call of duty that takes place in the future even though cod 4 took place in 2013 but ya know thats not the future even though the game came out in 2007 so 2013 was definitely the future way to go thats how you can tell activision doesnt give a **** about the games that come out with their name printed on the cover they just care about the money

Wow. The fact that you can infer such a harsh and definitive title towards a great company, and just following know-nothing stereotypes, is quite insane. If you look at Cod 4, Cod 4 is set in the future, but does integrate any real futuristic aspects into the MP, and lurking into the distant future. Laser Red Dot Sights, of course, but this wasn't futuristic at the time. Black Ops 2 is the first Cod that will integrate futuristic gameplay, into the game. Whether or not he made a mistake in pointing this out, it doesn't matter. OK, he made an error, and from that you assume that all they care about is money. Did you know that Black Ops 2 has over 300 workers developing the game, more than any other Cod game? More jobs = less money, and so what if they can afford it, they are still working on putting more into the game. How you can compile that assumption from either a simple mistake, or actually inferring what is right, is just funny to me. This demonstrates not in one bit how Activision is money stealing, and selfish.

Stop trying to use big words, it makes you sound the opposite of what you want to sound like.
And by the way, red dot sights are available now... and laser sights.
DeadlyDasher robotic tanks and vehicles seem too futuristic for 13 years to me

I like the idea of the branching story line and zombies again but tbh The whole futuristic thing...Just NOOO If I wanted Halo I would buy it...

tport i like how he said its the first call of duty that takes place in the future even though cod 4 took place in 2013 but ya know thats not the future even though the game came out in 2007 so 2013 was definitely the future way to go thats how you can tell activision doesnt give a **** about the games that come out with their name printed on the cover they just care about the money

Wow. The fact that you can infer such a harsh and definitive title towards a great company, and just following know-nothing stereotypes, is quite insane. If you look at Cod 4, Cod 4 is set in the future, but does integrate any real futuristic aspects into the MP, and lurking into the distant future. Laser Red Dot Sights, of course, but this wasn't futuristic at the time. Black Ops 2 is the first Cod that will integrate futuristic gameplay, into the game. Whether or not he made a mistake in pointing this out, it doesn't matter. OK, he made an error, and from that you assume that all they care about is money. Did you know that Black Ops 2 has over 300 workers developing the game, more than any other Cod game? More jobs = less money, and so what if they can afford it, they are still working on putting more into the game. How you can compile that assumption from either a simple mistake, or actually inferring what is right, is just funny to me. This demonstrates not in one bit how Activision is money stealing, and selfish.

i like how he said its the first call of duty that takes place in the future even though cod 4 took place in 2013 but ya know thats not the future even though the game came out in 2007 so 2013 was definitely the future way to go thats how you can tell activision doesnt give a shit about the games that come out with their name printed on the cover they just care about the money