Anonymous claims PSN hack affecting 10 million

4.6
A member of hacker group Anonymous has claimed to have hacked the PlayStation Network.

According to the 'hacker', a 50GB database of user information has been stolen, affecting some 10 million people.
A list of email addresses and seemingly encrypted passwords has been published, linked to via Anonymous' Twitter account.

But are the claims genuine? Evidence suggests not; as Kotaku reports, the list of supposed PSN email addresses released by the hacker appears to be a cut-and-paste of a previous and seemingly unrelated email list posted back in March.

Regardless, probably worth nipping online and changing your password, just in case.

Sony is yet to respond to requests for comment.

The threat of another PSN hack will be no small thing for PlayStation owners who endured weeks of PSN downtime and the threat of identity theft when the network was hit with a series of major attacks last year.

Update: Sony Computer Entertainment America's Shane Bettenhausen has deemed the claims "totally fake" via a Twitter post that has since seemingly been deleted.

Posted:

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/363355/anonymous-claims-psn-hack-affecting-10-million/

Related Articles

Comments

"Anonymous claims PSN hack affecting 10 million" :: Login/Create an Account :: 203 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

yayPosted:

Minecart
Emazing-Lights
Scanty
AAmbitionsIsBack
Sage I don't care what anyone has too say, poor security or top notch security, I'm still buying a PS3.

Like I said in my comments below, anybody can get hack.

It just so happen to be Sony, and the PSN users were the ones to suffer.

Plus I'm fed up with Xbox Live and its customer support.

I can have a nice time on PSN for free, unlike Xbox Live.

Besides Xbox's Party Chat, there is nothing else that is different.

Every Xbox Live user defense is "You pay for security and reliability."

Well that is completely false, I doubt our money is going towards a better security and what not.

So you telling me that in big corporations, banks, and federal organizations don't have good security?

That is a invalid statement that people make.

Xbox Live and Microsoft in general does not have a perfect security system where nobody could take it down.

Could it be almost or near-to perfect? Yeah maybe.

I'm not bashing or hating on either console, or trying to start a console war.

Just making a valid point that we (or should I say you) are NOT paying for "better" security.

Microsoft is a billion dollar company. They make huge profits on other things besides Xbox Live.

Nintendo and Sony are successful without making it mandatory for users to pay for online gaming and a "better" security.

Will Nintendo and Sony follow towards this trend? Yeah I honestly think so, in the next generation of console gaming. (We already seeing Sony leaning towards this with Playstation Plus)

You don't have too argue with me, you have the right to disagree with me.

That was a pretty good post! And I believe that anon only hacked psn because they supported something. Plus this "hack" is still not for sure.


No, it was false. There was no "hack".

What do you mean there was no hack?


Right? It says anonymous hacked PS3 didn't it?


Bottom of the article, it states it was false.

MazurPosted:

Farenheit get your **** together sony.. :P


it is together, this was just a false hack, nothing really happened.

PeetzuhPosted:

Emazing-Lights
Scanty
AAmbitionsIsBack
Sage I don't care what anyone has too say, poor security or top notch security, I'm still buying a PS3.

Like I said in my comments below, anybody can get hack.

It just so happen to be Sony, and the PSN users were the ones to suffer.

Plus I'm fed up with Xbox Live and its customer support.

I can have a nice time on PSN for free, unlike Xbox Live.

Besides Xbox's Party Chat, there is nothing else that is different.

Every Xbox Live user defense is "You pay for security and reliability."

Well that is completely false, I doubt our money is going towards a better security and what not.

So you telling me that in big corporations, banks, and federal organizations don't have good security?

That is a invalid statement that people make.

Xbox Live and Microsoft in general does not have a perfect security system where nobody could take it down.

Could it be almost or near-to perfect? Yeah maybe.

I'm not bashing or hating on either console, or trying to start a console war.

Just making a valid point that we (or should I say you) are NOT paying for "better" security.

Microsoft is a billion dollar company. They make huge profits on other things besides Xbox Live.

Nintendo and Sony are successful without making it mandatory for users to pay for online gaming and a "better" security.

Will Nintendo and Sony follow towards this trend? Yeah I honestly think so, in the next generation of console gaming. (We already seeing Sony leaning towards this with Playstation Plus)

You don't have too argue with me, you have the right to disagree with me.

That was a pretty good post! And I believe that anon only hacked psn because they supported something. Plus this "hack" is still not for sure.


No, it was false. There was no "hack".

What do you mean there was no hack?


Right? It says anonymous hacked PS3 didn't it?

EmazedPosted:

Scanty
AAmbitionsIsBack
Sage I don't care what anyone has too say, poor security or top notch security, I'm still buying a PS3.

Like I said in my comments below, anybody can get hack.

It just so happen to be Sony, and the PSN users were the ones to suffer.

Plus I'm fed up with Xbox Live and its customer support.

I can have a nice time on PSN for free, unlike Xbox Live.

Besides Xbox's Party Chat, there is nothing else that is different.

Every Xbox Live user defense is "You pay for security and reliability."

Well that is completely false, I doubt our money is going towards a better security and what not.

So you telling me that in big corporations, banks, and federal organizations don't have good security?

That is a invalid statement that people make.

Xbox Live and Microsoft in general does not have a perfect security system where nobody could take it down.

Could it be almost or near-to perfect? Yeah maybe.

I'm not bashing or hating on either console, or trying to start a console war.

Just making a valid point that we (or should I say you) are NOT paying for "better" security.

Microsoft is a billion dollar company. They make huge profits on other things besides Xbox Live.

Nintendo and Sony are successful without making it mandatory for users to pay for online gaming and a "better" security.

Will Nintendo and Sony follow towards this trend? Yeah I honestly think so, in the next generation of console gaming. (We already seeing Sony leaning towards this with Playstation Plus)

You don't have too argue with me, you have the right to disagree with me.

That was a pretty good post! And I believe that anon only hacked psn because they supported something. Plus this "hack" is still not for sure.


No, it was false. There was no "hack".

What do you mean there was no hack?

yayPosted:

AAmbitionsIsBack
Sage I don't care what anyone has too say, poor security or top notch security, I'm still buying a PS3.

Like I said in my comments below, anybody can get hack.

It just so happen to be Sony, and the PSN users were the ones to suffer.

Plus I'm fed up with Xbox Live and its customer support.

I can have a nice time on PSN for free, unlike Xbox Live.

Besides Xbox's Party Chat, there is nothing else that is different.

Every Xbox Live user defense is "You pay for security and reliability."

Well that is completely false, I doubt our money is going towards a better security and what not.

So you telling me that in big corporations, banks, and federal organizations don't have good security?

That is a invalid statement that people make.

Xbox Live and Microsoft in general does not have a perfect security system where nobody could take it down.

Could it be almost or near-to perfect? Yeah maybe.

I'm not bashing or hating on either console, or trying to start a console war.

Just making a valid point that we (or should I say you) are NOT paying for "better" security.

Microsoft is a billion dollar company. They make huge profits on other things besides Xbox Live.

Nintendo and Sony are successful without making it mandatory for users to pay for online gaming and a "better" security.

Will Nintendo and Sony follow towards this trend? Yeah I honestly think so, in the next generation of console gaming. (We already seeing Sony leaning towards this with Playstation Plus)

You don't have too argue with me, you have the right to disagree with me.

That was a pretty good post! And I believe that anon only hacked psn because they supported something. Plus this "hack" is still not for sure.


No, it was false. There was no "hack".

FarenheitPosted:

AAmbitionsIsBack
Sage I don't care what anyone has too say, poor security or top notch security, I'm still buying a PS3.

Like I said in my comments below, anybody can get hack.

It just so happen to be Sony, and the PSN users were the ones to suffer.

Plus I'm fed up with Xbox Live and its customer support.

I can have a nice time on PSN for free, unlike Xbox Live.

Besides Xbox's Party Chat, there is nothing else that is different.

Every Xbox Live user defense is "You pay for security and reliability."

Well that is completely false, I doubt our money is going towards a better security and what not.

So you telling me that in big corporations, banks, and federal organizations don't have good security?

That is a invalid statement that people make.

Xbox Live and Microsoft in general does not have a perfect security system where nobody could take it down.

Could it be almost or near-to perfect? Yeah maybe.

I'm not bashing or hating on either console, or trying to start a console war.

Just making a valid point that we (or should I say you) are NOT paying for "better" security.

Microsoft is a billion dollar company. They make huge profits on other things besides Xbox Live.

Nintendo and Sony are successful without making it mandatory for users to pay for online gaming and a "better" security.

Will Nintendo and Sony follow towards this trend? Yeah I honestly think so, in the next generation of console gaming. (We already seeing Sony leaning towards this with Playstation Plus)

You don't have too argue with me, you have the right to disagree with me.

That was a pretty good post! And I believe that anon only hacked psn because they supported something. Plus this "hack" is still not for sure.



sony is know for realsing console that are not monitered and games that shortly will become unsupported with online play

yes ps3 is free to play online, but everything thats extra online will cost you

xbox can maintain its security because it is making money off of our memberships
monthly

where as sony sells a ps3 and thats where the money trail basically stops
microsoft has the money to do whatever they want, and they are slowly but surely leaving sony in the dark


sony has been playing keep up for the last 2 console before p3's and 360 and its always going to be that way

so honestly, buy a ps3 already and go talk shit somewhere else
i wouldnt even conseder linking my credit card on a ps3, but with xbox i feel perfectly safe

have a nice day

FarenheitPosted:

get your shit together sony.. :P

PoonPosted:

AIexis PSN hacked again? I'll stick with my Xbox :P


Indeed, this never happens to xbox because PS3 fanboys dont realize that the reason charges so much for online is so they can provied for protection for their users.

AAmbitionsIsBackPosted:

Sage I don't care what anyone has too say, poor security or top notch security, I'm still buying a PS3.

Like I said in my comments below, anybody can get hack.

It just so happen to be Sony, and the PSN users were the ones to suffer.

Plus I'm fed up with Xbox Live and its customer support.

I can have a nice time on PSN for free, unlike Xbox Live.

Besides Xbox's Party Chat, there is nothing else that is different.

Every Xbox Live user defense is "You pay for security and reliability."

Well that is completely false, I doubt our money is going towards a better security and what not.

So you telling me that in big corporations, banks, and federal organizations don't have good security?

That is a invalid statement that people make.

Xbox Live and Microsoft in general does not have a perfect security system where nobody could take it down.

Could it be almost or near-to perfect? Yeah maybe.

I'm not bashing or hating on either console, or trying to start a console war.

Just making a valid point that we (or should I say you) are NOT paying for "better" security.

Microsoft is a billion dollar company. They make huge profits on other things besides Xbox Live.

Nintendo and Sony are successful without making it mandatory for users to pay for online gaming and a "better" security.

Will Nintendo and Sony follow towards this trend? Yeah I honestly think so, in the next generation of console gaming. (We already seeing Sony leaning towards this with Playstation Plus)

You don't have too argue with me, you have the right to disagree with me.

That was a pretty good post! And I believe that anon only hacked psn because they supported something. Plus this "hack" is still not for sure.

CearnsyPosted:

AIexis PSN hacked again? I'll stick with my Xbox :P


False statement so no it wasnt hacked


Latest Downloads

Latest Tutorials