Most Of Starfield's Planets Will Be Devoid Of Life

4.5
If you're itching to hop into Bethesda's upcoming outer space-themed RPG Starfield and meet with the residents of its more than 1,000 different planets, you may want to cool your jets, as Executive Producer Todd Howard has revealed that only about 10% of those planets will be capable of sustaining life.

"For us, we view it as giving you, when you look at a system, here's the menu of things you can do," Howard said Thusday while appearing on the Kinda Funny Xcast."And like science, we're pushing it. About 10% of those planets have life on them, okay? We're pushing it to the edge of what do people think, what planets are in that Goldilocks zone versus planets that have resources."

This news from Howard follows up on the recent Starfield Direct showcase, in which Lead Technical Producer,Jean-Francois Levesque revealed that most of the game's planets will be procedurally generated as the player first approaches them, making them different for every player. Howard clarified a bit on how that procedural generation will play out, indicating that there are some set locations that will be the same every time, while most of a planet's resources will be spread out procedurally as determined by the specific planet on which you're landing. "What we do is we handcraft individual locations, and some of those are placed specifically — obviously the main cities and other quest locations — and then we have a suite of them that are generated or placed when you land, depending on that planet," he said Thursday. However, as Levesque had noted previously, side quests will be placed in different locations for every player.

It's no secret that Starfield's developers have been drawing inspiration from similar space-based resource-gathering game No Man's Sky, which hosts more than 18.4 quintillion procedurally generated planets (although those planets were generated before the game's release, so they'll always be the same for every player at the start of a solo game). While No Man's sky includes some barren worlds, where there's limited atmosphere and gravity and no plant or animal life — save for the scorpion-like hostile species that emerges from whispering eggs — barren planets are relatively rare, as opposed to in Starfield, where they'll apparently comprise 90 percent of the celestial bodies in explorable space.



As for the barren planets in Starfield, Howard said the team at Bethesda is making sure that they'll still have valuable resources that will make visiting them worthwhile, but more than that, there will be a special feeling that comes from landing on them. Drawing inspiration from astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, the second person to walk on the moon, Howard brought up his description of the "magnificent desolation" of the experience. "I think there's a certain beauty in landing on those and feeling 'I'm one of the only people or the only person ever [to] visit this planet' ... We hope everybody enjoys it for what it is, but it is an exploration different that what we've had," he explained.

Whether you're looking forward to interacting with bustling cities of interstellar life or finding your way through the desolation of dead planets, you'll get your chance when Starfield releases on the Xbox Series X|S and PC on September 6. You can download the latest Starfield Trainers and cheats from WeMod.

Posted:
Last Updated:
Related Forum: Xbox Forum

Source: https://www.dualshockers.com/most-of-starfields-planets-will-be-devoid-of-life/

Comments

"Most Of Starfield's Planets Will Be Devoid Of Life" :: Login/Create an Account :: 10 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

LukeGPosted:

THQ Does life mean human npc's or enemies cause if you play with the words he's using there's ~1000 planets, 10% has life so 100 is a ton but I know there's not going to be 100 human civilizations, it will feel very empty if there's 900+ planets with no enemies or anything but resources, but maybe I'm overthinking it. I just hope that doesn't mean 30 human planets and 70 with some life on it as in enemies and the rest is bare space with floating rocks


I think it just means anything living human or otherwise

LukeGPosted:

LebronIs6
DRPZ That's a huge disappointment for the hype that was given to this game. Although a lot of the hype I saw probably came from uneducated consumers looking for the next big thing, I believe they will add more and more "life" to the planets over the games' lifetime.


Sure they will add more overtime. But again, they cannot reasonably handcraft every single planet with locations, life and other ideas with the planet count being over 1000. It's also not that big of a disappointment if any for the hype of the game because there is such an incredible amount to do in the game at the end of the day.


I agree if they were to to do all that it would take too long and the game looks endless anyway flao I can't see a problem

LukeGPosted:

Runts not sure if that is so good depending what they mean by it


Just wait and see they got this game just right

LukeGPosted:

CalicoReidso seems like the game is going to flop already


This game will never flop my mate

LukeGPosted:

The more I see about this game the more I want to play it

ReidsoPosted:

seems like the game is going to flop already

RuntsPosted:

not sure if that is so good depending what they mean by it

LebronIs6Posted:

DRPZ That's a huge disappointment for the hype that was given to this game. Although a lot of the hype I saw probably came from uneducated consumers looking for the next big thing, I believe they will add more and more "life" to the planets over the games' lifetime.


Sure they will add more overtime. But again, they cannot reasonably handcraft every single planet with locations, life and other ideas with the planet count being over 1000. It's also not that big of a disappointment if any for the hype of the game because there is such an incredible amount to do in the game at the end of the day.

THQPosted:

Does life mean human npc's or enemies cause if you play with the words he's using there's ~1000 planets, 10% has life so 100 is a ton but I know there's not going to be 100 human civilizations, it will feel very empty if there's 900+ planets with no enemies or anything but resources, but maybe I'm overthinking it. I just hope that doesn't mean 30 human planets and 70 with some life on it as in enemies and the rest is bare space with floating rocks

DRPZPosted:

That's a huge disappointment for the hype that was given to this game. Although a lot of the hype I saw probably came from uneducated consumers looking for the next big thing, I believe they will add more and more "life" to the planets over the games' lifetime.