Leaked GameStop poster reveals content of first DLC pack for Ghosts

4.6
Call of Duty: Ghosts DLC drop Onslaught may be released on January 28, if a purported shot of a poster advert for it on display at a GameStop store is any indication.

According to shots taken of the poster and submitted to Charlie Intel, the multiplayer maps for the DLC are listed as follows: Fog, Ignition, Containment, and Bayview.

The pack comes with the Maverick AR & Sniper Rifle as a bonus weapon, episode one of Extinction called Nightfall, taking up where the point of contact mission left off in the core game.

While the shots look legitimate, it’s always safe to keep your excitement at bay until Activision makes an official announcement regarding the contents and the release date.

Multiplayer Maps:

Fog
Ignition
Containment
Bayview

Bonus Weapon:

Maverick AR & Sniper Rifle

Extinction:

Episode 1: Nightfall



Posted:
Related Forum: Call of Duty Forum

Source: http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/11/call-of-duty-ghosts-onslaught-contents-release-date-purportedly-revealed-via-gamestop-display/

Related Articles

Comments

"Leaked GameStop poster reveals content of first DLC pack for Ghosts" :: Login/Create an Account :: 221 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

AllSkinsNoSkillPosted:

J-E-T-S fog reminds me of the swamp fever level in left 4 dead two.


It reminds me of the old W@W zombies map.I can't remember the map name though :/

AllSkinsNoSkillPosted:

I can't wait for the dlc I am so bored with this game.

TaigaAisakaPosted:

ODST I'm sorry but when putting more content, such as "new" weapons, becomes "bonus" content as part of a DLC, that's when DLC has gone too far. It's like developers of CoD (both 3Arc and IW (also ravencrap and smeldgehammer)) are pretending to be good guys for adding in more than the original 4 new maps for CoD and extra for whatever the other game type is (extinction/ special ops/ zombies). You can't say that these DLCs weren't already thought of before the game even released nor can you justify that $15 worth of maps and a "bonus weapon" are worth the value given. DLC is a gimmick and shouldn't be a part of any game unless it comes from the developers well after release and with thoughts from the community so that it draws a community back, not to dump more and more "value" into their games.


That's actually how I started to feel about DLC for the most part after I had seen this posted around a few times.

http://i.imgur.com/Z2LRgrx.jpg

Make perfect sense actually and I am truly starting to see that, not just CoD, DLC in general unless they go full out on it. Can't think of one right now that I have bought but then again I'm sure someone knows of a DLC that went full out and was more and likely very much worth buying it.

FinancialChadPosted:

Won't be getting, but should be interesting to see the Extinction episode :)

EverPosted:

The gun looks pretty cool. Wonder what the sniper rifle is?

CyimkingPosted:

ODST I'm sorry but when putting more content, such as "new" weapons, becomes "bonus" content as part of a DLC, that's when DLC has gone too far. It's like developers of CoD (both 3Arc and IW (also ravencrap and smeldgehammer)) are pretending to be good guys for adding in more than the original 4 new maps for CoD and extra for whatever the other game type is (extinction/ special ops/ zombies). You can't say that these DLCs weren't already thought of before the game even released nor can you justify that $15 worth of maps and a "bonus weapon" are worth the value given. DLC is a gimmick and shouldn't be a part of any game unless it comes from the developers well after release and with thoughts from the community so that it draws a community back, not to dump more and more "value" into their games.


Well majority of game developers have DLC's ideas before the game is released. This is due to the fact that they have to focus on making the overall project complete for adding in their ideas. Majority of the time, devs do not include some maps because it doesn't relate to the overall game OR they do not have time to build it up. Same for weapons.

Lastly, every game does this (or the major games; GTA V, Fallout / Elder Scrolls, Assassin's Creed, etc... So do not say that this is a gimmick because it's Call of Duty.

GazziPosted:

i think it is funny how all these people are judging the maps bay these tiny thumbnails. it's impossible to tell without a video.

J-E-T-SPosted:

fog reminds me of the swamp fever level in left 4 dead two.

ODSTPosted:

I'm sorry but when putting more content, such as "new" weapons, becomes "bonus" content as part of a DLC, that's when DLC has gone too far. It's like developers of CoD (both 3Arc and IW (also ravencrap and smeldgehammer)) are pretending to be good guys for adding in more than the original 4 new maps for CoD and extra for whatever the other game type is (extinction/ special ops/ zombies). You can't say that these DLCs weren't already thought of before the game even released nor can you justify that $15 worth of maps and a "bonus weapon" are worth the value given. DLC is a gimmick and shouldn't be a part of any game unless it comes from the developers well after release and with thoughts from the community so that it draws a community back, not to dump more and more "value" into their games.

HaloPosted:

Fog looks cool, the others.. don't look great at all.


Latest Downloads

Latest Tutorials