Call of Duty Advanced Warfare minimum specs

4.7
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare's minimum PC specifications have been released, alongside a gameplay launch trailer.

The required PC specs, which are published below the new video, were originally posted on Steam ahead of the game's release in a fortnight.

Minimum system requirements
OS: OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit / Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Processor: Intel CoreTM i3-530 @ 2.93 GHz / AMD PhenomTM II X4 810 @ 2.80 GHz or better
Memory: 6 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 @ 1GB / ATI Radeon HD 5870 @ 1GB or better
DirectX: Version 11
Network: Broadband Internet connection
Hard Drive: 55 GB available space
Sound Card: DirectX-compatible


The Call of Duty Advanced Warfare release date is November 4 on PC, Xbox 360, Xbox One, PS3 and PS4.

Activision has announced that customers who purchase the game digitally on Xbox 360 or PS3 will be able to download the new-gen version within the same console family free of charge.



Posted:
Related Forum: PC Gaming Forum

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/479054/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-minimum-specs-launch-trailer-released/

Related Articles

Comments

"Call of Duty Advanced Warfare minimum specs" :: Login/Create an Account :: 55 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

BloomyPosted:

That's unreal, if I didn't have a computer that could already run the game fine, I wouldn't even bother getting it for the PC, or anything for that matter.

OdinPosted:

Beet
ProJimmyRustler
Sanctyy
iTzOmNi Nice a $600 dollar computer to run a $60 dollar game. or you could have a $400 dollar console to run it 60fps 1080p. :)


Shame you're ignorant, a $350 PC could run this game. Plus, people aren't building PC's for the sole purpose of playing CoD.

OT- 55GB? For real? Why are games becoming so large now? It sucks.


They are larger now, because you don't have to throttle everything down for 360/PS3. On top of the larger game sizes the day one "Updates" are ridiculous. They are 25gb+. You just hit almost 100gb you have haven't touched the game yet. Ridiculous.


I might be wrong but it could be just like Ghost, where there was over 20GB of uncompressed audio files. If that is the case it shows laziness.


That is the problem, developers are getting lazy and aren't compressing the data. Look at The Elder Scrolls Skyrim, that game ran great, had awesome graphics, nice quality audio, and it was only ~5GB install size. Dev's no are goddamn retarded nowadays

BeetPosted:

ProJimmyRustler
Sanctyy
iTzOmNi Nice a $600 dollar computer to run a $60 dollar game. or you could have a $400 dollar console to run it 60fps 1080p. :)


Shame you're ignorant, a $350 PC could run this game. Plus, people aren't building PC's for the sole purpose of playing CoD.

OT- 55GB? For real? Why are games becoming so large now? It sucks.


They are larger now, because you don't have to throttle everything down for 360/PS3. On top of the larger game sizes the day one "Updates" are ridiculous. They are 25gb+. You just hit almost 100gb you have haven't touched the game yet. Ridiculous.


I might be wrong but it could be just like Ghost, where there was over 20GB of uncompressed audio files. If that is the case it shows laziness.

AD4MPosted:

Kohnz 55gb seems like a bit but i guess it would be alright if you had a 1 or 2tb hardrive


Comparing with all the other games, no its a lot!

goonbagPosted:

55gb seems like a bit but i guess it would be alright if you had a 1 or 2tb hardrive

ProJimmyRustlerPosted:

Sanctyy
iTzOmNi Nice a $600 dollar computer to run a $60 dollar game. or you could have a $400 dollar console to run it 60fps 1080p. :)


Shame you're ignorant, a $350 PC could run this game. Plus, people aren't building PC's for the sole purpose of playing CoD.

OT- 55GB? For real? Why are games becoming so large now? It sucks.


They are larger now, because you don't have to throttle everything down for 360/PS3. On top of the larger game sizes the day one "Updates" are ridiculous. They are 25gb+. You just hit almost 100gb you have haven't touched the game yet. Ridiculous.

TreyarchedPosted:

-Deano
Treyarched
iTzOmNi Nice a $600 dollar computer to run a $60 dollar game. or you could have a $400 dollar console to run it 60fps 1080p. :)


Yeah run it on console where they turn down the graphical details just to get the game to run at 60fps @ 1080p.

!!!!!BEST OPTION!!!!!
Play a better game.


True, play a better game. I'm fairly sure they said it can't run 60@1080p?
XBox One is 900p, I remember 1080p being targetd for PS4 but hadn't seen any info on that since.


Those "next gen" consoles are pathetic imo if they are struggling to hit a resolution of 1080p at release just think how bad games are run on them in a few more years when the graphical details get even better.

-NeganPosted:

I thought my computer was bad with Killing Floor......well, I guess I'm going to receive a nice .0002 FPS.

MaggardoPosted:

Gulp this is so expensive just to play ghosts


This ain't CoD Ghosts. This is Advanced Warfare.

-DeanoPosted:

Treyarched
iTzOmNi Nice a $600 dollar computer to run a $60 dollar game. or you could have a $400 dollar console to run it 60fps 1080p. :)


Yeah run it on console where they turn down the graphical details just to get the game to run at 60fps @ 1080p.

!!!!!BEST OPTION!!!!!
Play a better game.


True, play a better game. I'm fairly sure they said it can't run 60@1080p?
XBox One is 900p, I remember 1080p being targetd for PS4 but hadn't seen any info on that since.


Latest Downloads

Latest Tutorials