SC0TTISH wrote

a77u wrote So here is the truth that most of you cant accept:
BF3 is superior in almost every way. You have destructible environments, a story that actually is plausible and fun, the multiplayer has way more options and bigger maps, player counts, VEHICLES!!!. On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops. I know you fanboys want to waste your money on it because its a Cod. go ahead and do it.

I like how you say bigger maps like its a good thing lol all people to on bfbc is camp it is boring and slow paced .

Camp? How can you camp on a game with 100% destructible buildings? As soon as you get killed by a camper you can RPG the wall that he's behind or mortar strike the hill he's hiding around. CoD is the campers game. No Battlefield.

PAVMAN_TTG wrote COD MW3 will have better online gameplay, but BF3 will have better campaign

I think the same thing as you

But no cares about campaign. :

-CuDi- wrote

PAVMAN_TTG wrote COD MW3 will have better online gameplay, but BF3 will have better campaign

You are wrong here my friend, BF3 (along with ALL BF's) has the most enjoyable and fun multiplayer. The campaign is outstanding. CoD will fall in 2011.

Didn't they say it will fall other years
But it turned out a great game
Or are you talking about its coming out lol

CoD Will always be better. Don't get me wrong I love battlefield but, Call Of Duty has been around since October 29, 2003. And has a MUCH Bigger fan base than Battlefield. 3 Battlefields trying to compete with 8 Call Of Dutys? I think we all know who's gonna win there.

battle field is a good game yes but mw3 will sell more because its well cod even if it is crap and a waste of money people will always buy cod. on the other hand with battlefield many people play it but when you actually ask them do you like the maps they always say NO thats because the maps are too big :L and for mw3 the graphics looks amazing and will be locked at 60 fps so it cannot go below that

BF3 is going to kill COD, that's all I have to say. They keep having their trailers\teasers short and simple, it'll get them far.

1. Cod has vehicles
2. i like the campaign
3. Battle field bad company 2 had only rush and squad death match while cod had over 10 game modes
4. BF3 will have bigger maps but i personally like smaller ones
5. i dont like destroying building it just makes less space and i dont care about graphics only if the game is fun i'll play it
6. u can unlock everything at a low level while in COD u can prestige and the all the guns are unlock near the highest level in the game if you dont prestige

sooo COD is better

I think it's good that BF3 won't be bought by the Cod fanboys, the game will be way better without noobs wondering were there perks went.

a77u wrote On the graphics side, no matter what youre playing on, BF3 will have better graphics and an up to date engine unlike MW3 which will be using the same engine as MW2 and Black Ops.

That awkward moment you tell him that blackops and mw2 used completely different engines and battlefield will infact be slow paced and boring.

in my opinion battlefield has a much more better campaign but all cods are complete ego-shooters..i think battlefield mutliplayer is like a science fiction shooter like halo...cod is more tactic and almost a iprovement of would famous counter strike..