Hey guess what,

galaxyblast wrote

DerbyA95 wrote the straight answer is no. just no. god as people describe him would not put people through such ordeals as people go through today.

Actually the bible states that God loves us, but he expects us to take care of ourselves.

oh My GOD
Like what i done there
Did u Actualy Read The Bible to Find that

Pivzz wrote Hey guess what,

Click to View Content

Fake and Gay.

Said the Troll :trollin: on =3

ValorDesigns wrote

DerbyA95 wrote the straight answer is no. just no. god as people describe him would not put people through such ordeals as people go through today.

have you ever heard of free will given by god? dont go flaming if u dont know what your talkin about he could have kept us all under control from what i beleive but he wouldnt do that so get your facts strait

Constitution.....
its called Freedom of Speech
Kinda the same
Free will is also given by our GOOD GOVERMENT!
YOUR GOD HAS NOTHING!!!!! (cuase there is none)
Now go munch on facts

You know Jesus died because he went to Jerusalem and went into a Jewish church and started to try to convert them to the Catholic church. I'm atheist and I HAVE read both the new and the old testimony and none of it makes sense.

See, I am a Catholic and believe in God, but your ideas are skewed. We did indeed evolve, and as we evolved from the big bang, we weren't all babies randomly, we started changing as every other baby was born (this is in general, not exact). A slow process indeed. The Noah's Ark find in Turkey is debatable. You cant use Jesus Christ as an example for why you believe in him, as it contradicts definition. I believe God started evolution by initiating the Big Bang. Your ideas however, like I said, are skewed.

MrFunEGUY wrote See, I am a Catholic and believe in God, but your ideas are skewed. We did indeed evolve, and as we evolved from the big bang, we weren't all babies randomly, we started changing as every other baby was born (this is in general, not exact). A slow process indeed. The Noah's Ark find in Turkey is debatable. You cant use Jesus Christ as an example for why you believe in him, as it contradicts definition. I believe God started evolution by initiating the Big Bang. Your ideas however, like I said, are skewed.

The book of Genesis says that God gave human beings dominion over the earth. He said we are to be stewards of His creation. Today, God sustains the universe in a logical, orderly way so that we can understand and influence it as we fulfill our God-given dominion mandate.

In many cases, we can write equations to describe the consistent predictable behavior of the universe. These equations, or laws of nature, are descriptions of the way God upholds the universe in the present. However, these laws of nature cannot describe how God created the universe. Like the flashlight, the universe was not created by the same processes that operate within it today.

God makes clear in Genesis 2:2 that He changed His mode of operation by the seventh day, when He ended His work of creation. So God is no longer acting today in the same way He was during the Creation Week. He is no longer speaking new animals, plants, and stars into existence. Creation was a supernatural event, which cannot be described by todays laws of nature.

So naturalism (the underlying philosophy of the big bang) cannot be harmonized with Genesis. The big bang is diametrically opposed to the supernatural creation described in the Bible. Furthermore, there are many other differences between the big bang and the biblical account of origins. For example,
The Bible tells us that God created heaven, earth, and everything within them in the span of six days (Exodus 20:11) and rested on the seventh day. This is the basis for our work week (Exodus 20:8). In contrast, the big bang model claims that the universe and earth formed over billions of years.
Genesis tells us that God created the stars on the fourth daythree days after the earth was created. In contrast, the big bang model claims that stars existed billions of years before the earth.
The Bible tells us that the earth was made from water (2 Peter 3:5; Genesis 1:29; Psalm 24:2), but the standard secular model teaches that the earth began as a molten blob.

Here is some other stuff i posted in another topic:

What about the Scientific Evidence?
Most people dont realize that the big bang is not only bad theology but also bad science. Is the big bang the same kind of science that put men on the moon or allows your computer to function? Not at all. The big bang isnt testable, repeatable laboratory science. It doesnt make specific predictions that are confirmed by observation and experimentation. In fact, the big bang is at odds with a number of principles of real operational science. Lets explore some of these.

Missing Monopoles
Most people know something about magnets, like the kind found in a compass. These magnets have two polesa north pole and a south pole. Poles that are alike repel each other, and opposites attract. A monopole is a hypothetical massive particle that is just like a magnet but with only one pole. So a monopole would have either a north pole or a south pole, but not both. Particle physicists claim that the high temperature conditions of the big bang should have created magnetic monopoles. Since monopoles are predicted to be stable, they should have lasted to this day. Yet, despite considerable searching, monopoles have not been found. Where are the monopoles?

The fact that we dont find any monopoles strongly suggests that the universe never was that hot. This indicates that there never was a big bang. But the lack of monopoles is perfectly consistent with the Bibles account of creation because the universe did not start at extremely high temperatures.

Where Is the Antimatter?
Another challenge to the big bang is the baryon number problem. The big bang supposes that matter (hydrogen and helium gas) was created from energy as the universe expanded. However, experimental physics tells us that whenever matter is created from energy, such a reaction also produces antimatter.
Antimatter has similar properties to matter, except the charges of the particles are reversed. (So, whereas a proton has a positive charge, an antiproton has a negative charge). In any reaction where energy is transformed into matter, it produces an exactly equal amount of antimatter; there are no known exceptions.

The big bang (which has no matter to begin withonly energy) should have produced precisely equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Thus, if the big bang were true, there should be an exactly equal amount of matter and antimatter in the universe today. But there is not. The visible universe is comprised almost entirely of matterwith only trace amounts of antimatter.

This devastating problem for the big bang actually is a powerful confirmation of biblical creation; it is a design feature. God created the universe to be essentially matter onlyand its a good thing He did. When matter and antimatter come together, they violently destroy each other. If the universe had equal amounts of matter and antimatter (as the big bang requires), life would not be possible.

Missing Population III Stars
The big bang model by itself can account for the existence of only the three lightest elements (hydrogen, helium, and trace amounts of lithium). This leaves nearly 90 of the other naturally occurring elements to be explained. Since the conditions in the supposed big bang are not right to form these heavier elements (as big bang supporters readily concede), secular astronomers believe that stars have produced the remaining elements by nuclear fusion in their cores. This is thought to occur in the final stages of massive stars, as the stars explode (supernovae). These explosions then distribute the heavier elements into space. Second- and third-generation stars are thus contaminated with small amounts of these heavier elements.

If this story were true, then the first stars would be comprised of only the three lightest elements (since these would have been the only elements in existence initially). Some such stars1 should still be around today since their lifespans are computed to exceed the time that has elapsed since the big bang. Such stars would be called population III stars.2 Amazingly (to those who believe in the big bang), population III stars have not been found anywhere. All known stars have at least trace amounts of heavy elements in them. It is amazing to think that our galaxy alone is estimated to have over 100 billion stars in it. Yet not one star has been discovered that is comprised of only the three lightest elements.

In conclusion the bible isn't a subway sandwich bar. You cannot just go along and pick and choose what you want. It is all or nothing. Anything else is idolatry because you are setting up a god that fits you...

that noah's ark story is interesting. good post mate. keep your beliefs

bro i believe in god and i agree with what you are doing here, but the bible also states to let people believe what they want to. if someone has read the bible and has been educated about god but they freely choose to still not believe, it is their choice...

no disrespect my friend but answer this then ill believe you...

1. what came first chicken or the egg?...
because we need a chicken for an egg and an egg for a chicken?...

2.it states god can do anything he believes and he can't die but if he cant die then he cant kill himself other words he cant do everything.

sorry just my opinion
pm me with the answer.

-Microsoft-