maniac3456 wrote

-LinkinPark- wrote I wouldn't say Battlefield are harder than CoD. There more strategic than CoD's multiplayer and working as a team plays a big part in it.

Frostbite 2.0 is the best game engine out right now and IW's is too outdated to be as good as DICE's.

BF3 will be better this year even if MW3 sells more.

You are wrong. If MW3 sells more and has more players, then it is better. Nobody cares about graphics. I would play Call of Duty if it were in 2D. I wouldn't care. There is more teamplay and strategy in Call of Duty and it is easier for beginners to get used to

Have you noticed the way CoD always get's infested by 12 year olds round Christmas time? That's because Activision doesn't give a shit about who plays there game as long as they make money for it and you have no idea what your talking about if you say CoD has more teamplay and strategic work involved.

-LinkinPark- wrote

maniac3456 wrote

-LinkinPark- wrote I wouldn't say Battlefield are harder than CoD. There more strategic than CoD's multiplayer and working as a team plays a big part in it.

Frostbite 2.0 is the best game engine out right now and IW's is too outdated to be as good as DICE's.

BF3 will be better this year even if MW3 sells more.

You are wrong. If MW3 sells more and has more players, then it is better. Nobody cares about graphics. I would play Call of Duty if it were in 2D. I wouldn't care. There is more teamplay and strategy in Call of Duty and it is easier for beginners to get used to

Have you noticed the way CoD always get's infested by 12 year olds round Christmas time? That's because Activision doesn't give a **** about who plays there game as long as they make money for it and you have no idea what your talking about if you say CoD has more teamplay and strategic work involved.

^agreed^ oh and btw off topic but linkin park was my favorite band until a thousand suns.

Clearly2Beast wrote

-LinkinPark- wrote

maniac3456 wrote

-LinkinPark- wrote I wouldn't say Battlefield are harder than CoD. There more strategic than CoD's multiplayer and working as a team plays a big part in it.

Frostbite 2.0 is the best game engine out right now and IW's is too outdated to be as good as DICE's.

BF3 will be better this year even if MW3 sells more.

You are wrong. If MW3 sells more and has more players, then it is better. Nobody cares about graphics. I would play Call of Duty if it were in 2D. I wouldn't care. There is more teamplay and strategy in Call of Duty and it is easier for beginners to get used to

Have you noticed the way CoD always get's infested by 12 year olds round Christmas time? That's because Activision doesn't give a **** about who plays there game as long as they make money for it and you have no idea what your talking about if you say CoD has more teamplay and strategic work involved.

^agreed^ oh and btw off topic but linkin park was my favorite band until a thousand suns.

It isn't there best album but i still love their work. I've been a fan of them since Hybrid Theory and never stopped buying their albums.

a good game doesnt mean it has to be new and revelutionary concepts. mw2 story was probably the best story of any FPS out there and it didnt have the frostbite engine or destructable enviroment. CoD does a better with campaign and co-op even without battlefields "god-engine". bf3 will still b a great game and ill still buy it but a CoD story will beat its campaign everytime.

MW3>BF3

JeeezusChrist wrote I love how everyone is so quick to dump modern warfare 3 because if you knew anything than you'd know modern warfare 3 is running in frostbite 2.0 also. On top of that, where are you getting your info that Battlefield is going to be better? No where. The battlefield series is a good series don't get me wrong but call of duty has been the game since cod 4 came out and your trying to tell me a game with that much reputation is going to fail, is going to be overpowered, is going to suck? I'll agree with the next guy that Black ops was a disaster but modern warfare 1 and modern warfare 2 are by far better games than battlefield 3 will be and that's not even to mention what modern warfare 3 is going to make it look like.
Oh yeah and way to be completely byist in your poles

Where are you getting your info that MW1 and MW2 will be better than BF3, then?

And also, neither game will be better, it's just OPINION

Personally, I will be getting both, because they will both be good but in my OPINION, Battlefield 3 looks better at this moment in time, but we'll have to see.

JezusX wrote

JeeezusChrist wrote I love how everyone is so quick to dump modern warfare 3 because if you knew anything than you'd know modern warfare 3 is running in frostbite 2.0 also. On top of that, where are you getting your info that Battlefield is going to be better? No where. The battlefield series is a good series don't get me wrong but call of duty has been the game since cod 4 came out and your trying to tell me a game with that much reputation is going to fail, is going to be overpowered, is going to suck? I'll agree with the next guy that Black ops was a disaster but modern warfare 1 and modern warfare 2 are by far better games than battlefield 3 will be and that's not even to mention what modern warfare 3 is going to make it look like.
Oh yeah and way to be completely byist in your poles

Where are you getting your info that MW1 and MW2 will be better than BF3, then?

And also, neither game will be better, it's just OPINION

Personally, I will be getting both, because they will both be good but in my OPINION, Battlefield 3 looks better at this moment in time, but we'll have to see.

I agree they are both gonna be good so im going to get both and bf3 has had more time to be worked with so thats why it looks better than mw3 right now

I Personally like battlefield aswell but mainly because the sniping is excelent but at the end of the day it's just preference

another thing why are there a bunch of ttg users 1 and 2 commenting saying that mw3 will be better maybe to leech into some lobbies i suppose

Connect wrote I love Call of Duty better than Battlefield. The quality of Call of Duty's gameplay features are way better than Battlefield's.

more gameplay features? youve got to be joking. Battlefield doubles, and almost triples call of duty's features.

-LinkinPark- wrote

JeeezusChrist wrote I love how everyone is so quick to dump modern warfare 3 because if you knew anything than you'd know modern warfare 3 is running in frostbite 2.0 also. On top of that, where are you getting your info that Battlefield is going to be better? No where. The battlefield series is a good series don't get me wrong but call of duty has been the game since cod 4 came out and your trying to tell me a game with that much reputation is going to fail, is going to be overpowered, is going to suck? I'll agree with the next guy that Black ops was a disaster but modern warfare 1 and modern warfare 2 are by far better games than battlefield 3 will be and that's not even to mention what modern warfare 3 is going to make it look like.
Oh yeah and way to be completely byist in your poles

uMad bro? DICE would't let IW anywhere near there engine infact at E3 they banned any activision/iw associate's from their booth. MW3 is still running on Infinity Ward 4.0. and they have used that since CoD4 and just constantly updated it. OMFG if you think MW3 is gonna be better you need a **** brain.

You think this generic bullsh*t:

Is gonna be better than this:

actually they running on IW5.0....