You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Which do you like most?
Call of duty
41.67% (5 votes)
41.67% (5 votes)
Battlefield
58.33% (7 votes)
58.33% (7 votes)
Total Votes: 12
CoD or Battlefield. |Pros and cons|
Posted:
CoD or Battlefield. |Pros and cons|Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,606
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,606
Reputation Power: 64
Well, I want to see which game is more popular overall and which everyone likes the most.
Here are my views on the 2 games:
Call of duty:
Pros
1. Killstreaks
2. Private matches
3. Easier to obtain guns/upgrades
Cons
1. Camping
2. Ragers
3. Hackers
4. Over powered guns
5. Glitching
Overall thought:
Call of duty is a great game and all, but it is to repetitive. They just add new maps, new campaign, a few new guns, and then switch the perks around with different names and usually use the same engine. Also, there are many many hackers on call of duty, which usually ruins the gaming experience and enables people to unfairly rank up through 10th lobbies. And there is always a few guns in the game that are overpowered and so overused that it ruins the game. And the use of killstreaks is sometimes unfair, like in MW3 people can use support and get killstreaks they shouldn't have. Plus the many glitches that give some players an unfair advantage.
Battlefield 3:
Pros
1. Vehicles
2. Squads
3. Larger maps
4. More realistic audio
5. Better selection of equipment
6. Destroyable materials/buildings/cover
7. Co-op + Special unlockable Co-op guns for multiplayer
8. No hackers or glitchers
Cons
1. No private matches
2. Camping (Very little)
Overall thought:
From experience, I favor the Battlefield series more than CoD. The game is overall more realistic in sound (gun shots, explosions, etc.) and more realistic in general with other things, like the health bar, even though the health bar starts to regenerate after a while, its not like you can get shot in the head 4 times, get a red screen, take cover for 2 seconds and then regenerate your health like in CoD. And the addition of squads I found quite nice. You can get in a squad with your friends and spawn on eachother and help eachother out. Battlefield also has a better selection of equipment than in CoD. For instance, assault can put down med-pacs so nearby teammates can regenerate health and can also use defibrillators to revive downed team mates if they reach them in time. Or the support class can lay down ammo crates to regenerate nearby team mates ammo. And so on. And even though some equipment is limited to certain classes, its not like people can make a class with a little of everything like in CoD. And the destroyable material feature is useful because it allows you to make a improvised entrance to a building with explosives if the door/entrance is being camped or blocked (which I find quite fun) and to root out campers in buildings by taking down the walls. And there are no hackers nor are there any glitches.
Conclusion:
CoD and Battlefield are both great games, don't get me wrong. But personally I prefer Battlefield, and I've only had battlefield for a week, and I've played CoD since it came out. So, please leave a comment below with your view/opinion and which you game you like the most. And please vote on the poll.
Please do not flame or criticize others for their opinion!
Last edited by Pacem ; edited 2 times in total
Here are my views on the 2 games:
Call of duty:
Pros
1. Killstreaks
2. Private matches
3. Easier to obtain guns/upgrades
Cons
1. Camping
2. Ragers
3. Hackers
4. Over powered guns
5. Glitching
Overall thought:
Call of duty is a great game and all, but it is to repetitive. They just add new maps, new campaign, a few new guns, and then switch the perks around with different names and usually use the same engine. Also, there are many many hackers on call of duty, which usually ruins the gaming experience and enables people to unfairly rank up through 10th lobbies. And there is always a few guns in the game that are overpowered and so overused that it ruins the game. And the use of killstreaks is sometimes unfair, like in MW3 people can use support and get killstreaks they shouldn't have. Plus the many glitches that give some players an unfair advantage.
Battlefield 3:
Pros
1. Vehicles
2. Squads
3. Larger maps
4. More realistic audio
5. Better selection of equipment
6. Destroyable materials/buildings/cover
7. Co-op + Special unlockable Co-op guns for multiplayer
8. No hackers or glitchers
Cons
1. No private matches
2. Camping (Very little)
Overall thought:
From experience, I favor the Battlefield series more than CoD. The game is overall more realistic in sound (gun shots, explosions, etc.) and more realistic in general with other things, like the health bar, even though the health bar starts to regenerate after a while, its not like you can get shot in the head 4 times, get a red screen, take cover for 2 seconds and then regenerate your health like in CoD. And the addition of squads I found quite nice. You can get in a squad with your friends and spawn on eachother and help eachother out. Battlefield also has a better selection of equipment than in CoD. For instance, assault can put down med-pacs so nearby teammates can regenerate health and can also use defibrillators to revive downed team mates if they reach them in time. Or the support class can lay down ammo crates to regenerate nearby team mates ammo. And so on. And even though some equipment is limited to certain classes, its not like people can make a class with a little of everything like in CoD. And the destroyable material feature is useful because it allows you to make a improvised entrance to a building with explosives if the door/entrance is being camped or blocked (which I find quite fun) and to root out campers in buildings by taking down the walls. And there are no hackers nor are there any glitches.
Conclusion:
CoD and Battlefield are both great games, don't get me wrong. But personally I prefer Battlefield, and I've only had battlefield for a week, and I've played CoD since it came out. So, please leave a comment below with your view/opinion and which you game you like the most. And please vote on the poll.
Please do not flame or criticize others for their opinion!
Last edited by Pacem ; edited 2 times in total
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 408
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 408
Reputation Power: 19
Call of Duty
- because of the graphics
- i prefer to Prestige
- i have never really liked the Battlefield series till they came out with #3
- because of the graphics
- i prefer to Prestige
- i have never really liked the Battlefield series till they came out with #3
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,898
Reputation Power: 86
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,898
Reputation Power: 86
Ive been playing COD since it first came out. After MW3 i finally just quit and went back to Halo and Battlefield Battlefield is better in my opinion it's better because it's got vehicles, realistic sniping, realistic kick on guns, etc.
If they want to make COD good again there going to have to make something new alright..
If they want to make COD good again there going to have to make something new alright..
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,606
Reputation Power: 64
righthere wrote Ive been playing COD since it first came out. After MW3 i finally just quit and went back to Halo and Battlefield Battlefield is better in my opinion it's better because it's got vehicles, realistic sniping, realistic kick on guns, etc.Agreed. Although I still play CoD 4 and 5 occasionally.
If they want to make COD good again there going to have to make something new alright..
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 16
-Branson- wrote Call of Duty
- because of the graphics
- i prefer to Prestige
- i have never really liked the Battlefield series till they came out with #3
r u friken retarted go play battlefield 3 and then come back and talk shit you won't even be able to level up your so bad the graphics are boss
- 1useful
- 2not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,834
Reputation Power: 249
camping on battlefield?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 16
Human wrote camping on battlefield?
ya i now right there is an objective a lot of people think there is camping but i only seen about 3 campers from the day it came out
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,606
Reputation Power: 64
Human wrote camping on battlefield?There is a little. But not as much as Call of duty.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 408
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 408
Reputation Power: 19
TTG_Wyattt wrote-Branson- wrote Call of Duty
- because of the graphics
- i prefer to Prestige
- i have never really liked the Battlefield series till they came out with #3
r u friken retarted go play battlefield 3 and then come back and talk **** you won't even be able to level up your so bad the graphics are boss
man are you kidding me ?
lmao first of all read the topic before you post
ask anyone MW3 has 10x better graphics then BF3
u dont know what your talkin about bud
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,606
Reputation Power: 64
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,606
Reputation Power: 64
-Branson- wroteTTG_Wyattt wroteIts all about personal opinion.-Branson- wrote Call of Duty
- because of the graphics
- i prefer to Prestige
- i have never really liked the Battlefield series till they came out with #3
r u friken retarted go play battlefield 3 and then come back and talk **** you won't even be able to level up your so bad the graphics are boss
man are you kidding me ?
lmao first of all read the topic before you post
ask anyone MW3 has 10x better graphics then BF3
u dont know what your talkin about bud
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.