You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 27, 201212Year Member
Posts: 245
Reputation Power: 22
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 27, 201212Year Member
Posts: 245
Reputation Power: 22
I think a worse weapon than anything nuclear, is bioweapons such as dysentery, smallpox and anthrax that is weaponized.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 209
Reputation Power: 9
Status: Offline
Joined: May 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 209
Reputation Power: 9
Alright..let me get this straight: A nuke is not the world strongest bomb.
The hydrogen bomb is, a hydrogen bomb ignites the air, the very air you breathe turns into flames within seconds, everything dies, nothing survives.
The hydrogen bomb is, a hydrogen bomb ignites the air, the very air you breathe turns into flames within seconds, everything dies, nothing survives.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Zombiemodzftw wrote Alright..let me get this straight: A nuke is not the world strongest bomb.
The hydrogen bomb is, a hydrogen bomb ignites the air, the very air you breathe turns into flames within seconds, everything dies, nothing survives.
The Tsar Bomba was the most powerful in terms of energy output if it was dropped on a city it would be more destructive than a Hydrogen bomb, I think.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,348
Reputation Power: 68
The Military could invent a bomb that would be more effective but, in terms of a explosion they can't unless they want us to be like the dinosaurs
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#25. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 07, 201311Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 07, 201311Year Member
Posts: 86
Reputation Power: 3
A Nuke can't wipe out a country, but it can easily demolish an entire city. The explosion isn't huge either it's the radiaton from Nuke which is extremely dangerous.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#26. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 192
Reputation Power: 7
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 26, 201212Year Member
Posts: 192
Reputation Power: 7
Crazy stuff i was watching ancient aliens and it is said that the wander waffle was actually suppose to be made with a bunch of other guns that the nazi were going to use but they canceled there plans but i think they have something big planned for the big war with our technology today i wouldn't be surprised of what i see
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#27. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
Wez wroteDiaboli wrote Well russia had the Tsaa bomb, which was equivalent to 57 megatonnes of TNT.
Tsar Bomba*.
It was 50 megatons but was still 1.4% the power output of the Sun, so saying it was a powerful explosion is a mighty understatement, haha.
According to many forums and youtube videos, it was 57,000,000 tonnes, but yeah. That's quite a big bomb. Well, not for russians. They were probably all like woooo fireworks, lets get closer! (and drink more Vodka). No offense to russians or anything.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#28. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Diaboli wroteWez wroteDiaboli wrote Well russia had the Tsaa bomb, which was equivalent to 57 megatonnes of TNT.
Tsar Bomba*.
It was 50 megatons but was still 1.4% the power output of the Sun, so saying it was a powerful explosion is a mighty understatement, haha.
According to many forums and youtube videos, it was 57,000,000 tonnes, but yeah. That's quite a big bomb. Well, not for russians. They were probably all like woooo fireworks, lets get closer! (and drink more Vodka). No offense to russians or anything.
When you Google search what it was, the 'official' sites say 57 MT and the ones with written opinions, such as forums like this, say 50.
I would probably go with 57 from here on.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#29. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201311Year Member
Posts: 44
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201311Year Member
Posts: 44
Reputation Power: 1
1 Nuke Destroys 2 Small Citys or 1 Big City.
Hurp Durp.
Hurp Durp.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#30. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 121
Reputation Power: 4
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.