Thatch wrote I love how people always say the government isn't releasing things on their conspiracy posts. If the government had a revolutionary find, they would announce it.

And this is why the government is able to hide things from people. It's because most are so naive, that they'll believe anything. If you have yet to discover, the government is pretty crooked. They can manipulate things in such a way, people are bound to believe it.

So you mean to tell me, with the lack of resources, keeping an extra 600,000 is in the governments best interest? It's common sense, if we were to keep 600,000 on top of the babies born each year, wouldn't we lose our resources that much faster? Though it doesn't seem right, to let these 600,000 people die yearly, just because of a disease. But their looking at it as a way to exterminate people, without them actively engaging in doing so, whether it be from firing squad,nuclear warfare,etc.

Look, you're entitled to your own opinion, just like I am. But provide some information as to why you believe differently. I'm more then open to hear anyone's interpretations on a subject.

Voglia wrote

Thatch wrote I love how people always say the government isn't releasing things on their conspiracy posts. If the government had a revolutionary find, they would announce it.

And this is why the government is able to hide things from people. It's because most are so naive, that they'll believe anything. If you have yet to discover, the government is pretty crooked. They can manipulate things in such a way, people are bound to believe it.

So you mean to tell me, with the lack of resources, keeping an extra 600,000 is in the governments best interest? It's common sense, if we were to keep 600,000 on top of the babies born each year, wouldn't we lose our resources that much faster? Though it doesn't seem right, to let these 600,000 people die yearly, just because of a disease. But their looking at it as a way to exterminate people, without them actively engaging in doing so, whether it be from firing squad,nuclear warfare,etc.

Look, you're entitled to your own opinion, just like I am. But provide some information as to why you believe differently. I'm more then open to hear anyone's interpretations on a subject.

The only thing i see guilty with the us government is just being money hungry and wants power. But hey, who doesnt?

Water is the greatest solvent. Your body is made up of up to 60% of water. Therefore, I HIGHLY doubt that.

well.......... here's what I think

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Highly impossible. You will age and become weaker.

there literately would be no point, our bodys as humans would not survive longer then 100-150 years they would be totally degraded but one thing i can say is that there could be a drug to stop you ageing but i can tell you for sure it will not be in any of our lifetimes! anyone else agree with me?

I don't think this will happen.

1. As iHTML posted the body will eventually shut down.

2. Other things could kill you(Gun shots,explosion,falling to death,etc)

Gravity is a big cause of what makes you age. If they somehow found out how to stop the force of gravity, this may be possible. But the pill would literally have to go through every system in the body spreading it's immortality. I doubt it can do that and not miss one spot.

There are many things that can happen throughout our lifetime and this theory I think may be possible but in many more years. We probably need more advanced technology to actually get this kind of drug. But yes, it is possible.

A cell we produce stops/reduces the risk of cancers and other deadly diseases is the cause of us aging if that had a pill to stop that cell we may be able to live much longer, but you may die fast because that cell fights disease and removing it is like taking down your firewall.

Google it.