Lewis-E wrote Doesn't make sense. I'm saying for example Bale, probably going to be rated 87, is a MUCH MUCH better player than Hazard. Therefore should be higher rated. Hence making hazard an 86.

NO BALE ISN'T A MUCH BETTER PLAYER YOU KNOBBER, HE IS OVERATTED AND FOREVER SOUTHAMPTON'S, HE IS NO BETTER THAN HAZARD, NO WORSE. They are the same in different ways.

Go back to your armchair you recliner fan.

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote Doesn't make sense. I'm saying for example Bale, probably going to be rated 87, is a MUCH MUCH better player than Hazard. Therefore should be higher rated. Hence making hazard an 86.

NO BALE ISN'T A MUCH BETTER PLAYER YOU KNOBBER, HE IS OVERATTED AND FOREVER SOUTHAMPTON'S, HE IS NO BETTER THAN HAZARD, NO WORSE. They are the same in different ways.

Go back to your armchair you recliner fan.

Be quiet. Your insults are embarrassing.

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I agree with you there mate haha

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I'm not saying he's not good or a Chelsea hero. Just not an 87 player.

Intoccabile wrote

Mata- wrote

Lewis-E wrote

Mata- wrote

Lewis-E wrote

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote UP Santi Cazorla 86/7
Bale 88
Michu 82/3
Reus 86
Lukaku 83
Benteke 80 and maybe suarez

DO Hazard 86
Torres 83

Hazard down? You must be a anti Chelsea knob, because Hazard is the best player Chelsea have had for years...

So your saying he's as good as Suarez, cazorla, bale. All which Hazard is rated higher than.

Yes, he is still young, and is equal to Bale, all the rest are getting older/less talented.

You being serious? Suarez is 26 and Cazorla is 28. And to the other guy. I'm saying hazard isn't an87 rated player. He's still good just not that good. Especially as bale is rated 85 and Cazorla 84.

well the thing is you said bale upgrade to 88 whitch means he would be better than hazard and Cazorla too 86/7 whitch is the same or 1 under. so whats youre point

Cazorla and bale are better. That is my point.

haha youve got no come back......

DOUBLE TEAM AHAHAHAHA. What a mong, by the way, what was the Chelsea score yesterday?

hahhaha and 2-1 to you. rickie lambert scored an amazing free kick

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I'm not saying he's not good or a Chelsea hero. Just not an 87 player.

The European Champions last season and he is their best player this season but not worthy of an 87. No logic once again in that one

Mata- wrote

Intoccabile wrote

Mata- wrote

Lewis-E wrote

Mata- wrote

Lewis-E wrote

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote

Intoccabile wrote

Lewis-E wrote UP Santi Cazorla 86/7
Bale 88
Michu 82/3
Reus 86
Lukaku 83
Benteke 80 and maybe suarez

DO Hazard 86
Torres 83

Hazard down? You must be a anti Chelsea knob, because Hazard is the best player Chelsea have had for years...

So your saying he's as good as Suarez, cazorla, bale. All which Hazard is rated higher than.

Yes, he is still young, and is equal to Bale, all the rest are getting older/less talented.

You being serious? Suarez is 26 and Cazorla is 28. And to the other guy. I'm saying hazard isn't an87 rated player. He's still good just not that good. Especially as bale is rated 85 and Cazorla 84.

well the thing is you said bale upgrade to 88 whitch means he would be better than hazard and Cazorla too 86/7 whitch is the same or 1 under. so whats youre point

Cazorla and bale are better. That is my point.

haha youve got no come back......

DOUBLE TEAM AHAHAHAHA. What a mong, by the way, what was the Chelsea score yesterday?

hahhaha and 2-1 to you. rickie lambert scored an amazing free kick

I know mate, I was in that number aha.

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I'm not saying he's not good or a Chelsea hero. Just not an 87 player.

The European Champions last season and he is their best player this season but not worthy of an 87. No logic once again in that one

Do you know what logic means. It's perfect logic. I do not think he should be rated 87.

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote

VexerZ wrote

Lewis-E wrote Fifa rated him too highly. He's not as good as 87.

I don't support any team in the BPL but he has been a Chelsea hero since he has came and has served as a game winner for them in quite a number of matches.

I'm not saying he's not good or a Chelsea hero. Just not an 87 player.

The European Champions last season and he is their best player this season but not worthy of an 87. No logic once again in that one

Do you know what logic means. It's perfect logic. I do not think he should be rated 87.

Logic is the reasoning behind something. You have no argument here and yet you still think you are right.