You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Mykhal
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 23, 201013Year Member
Posts: 3,696
Reputation Power: 153
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 23, 201013Year Member
Posts: 3,696
Reputation Power: 153
Brad- wrote To be honest, he (the president of one of the most advanced countries in the world) knows a lot better than anybody on this site about what to do in these situations, I'm pretty sure he knows exactly what he's doing and I trust him completely with his actions
Your exactly right im an us army active reserve and guys are well were getting ready for a soultion i dont know if they will have a millitary strike most likely will im gonna end up getting shipped over there because my MOS is infantry
#12. Posted:
Relentless757
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 31, 201311Year Member
Posts: 473
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 31, 201311Year Member
Posts: 473
Reputation Power: 14
Good, but we need to do something about NK.
#13. Posted:
gmlukens
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,491
Reputation Power: 192
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,491
Reputation Power: 192
I think that it is good to look at all the options, but this makes the U.S. look indecisive and cowardly, im not saying that military action is the best action, but either do it or not, don't beat around the bush for so long. In reality, he could have had several very specific strikes on the chemical weapons plants and we wouldnt be having this conversation right now, and we wouldnt be having the international problems.
But we elected him as president so he better do what is best for the people :/
#14. Posted:
Beneath
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,867
Reputation Power: 323
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,867
Reputation Power: 323
I think that if we "HAVE" to send Troops over to Syria, it's going to have to happen. people are saying well is Russia going to try to stop us or anybody else Behind what has happened in Syria? I mean Families/Young Kids were Chemically Tortured to the Point where they could not breathe without having there insides on Fire. There was no reason to do this to There own people. If The U.S. has to handle business, that's what the U.S. is there for. The U.S. Troops went into Iraq for Saddam who had killed his own people also. I trust Obama with whatever his Decision may be. -Beneath
#15. Posted:
Killzoned
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,373
Reputation Power: 114
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 08, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,373
Reputation Power: 114
We don't need to fight other peoples battles. Over.
#16. Posted:
Relentless757
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 31, 201311Year Member
Posts: 473
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 31, 201311Year Member
Posts: 473
Reputation Power: 14
Jibbers wrote
Brad- wrote To be honest, he (the president of one of the most advanced countries in the world) knows a lot better than anybody on this site about what to do in these situations, I'm pretty sure he knows exactly what he's doing and I trust him completely with his actions
Your exactly right im an us army active reserve and guys are well were getting ready for a soultion i dont know if they will have a millitary strike most likely will im gonna end up getting shipped over there because my MOS is infantry


Obama said that troops will not be on the ground. It is strictly an air strike. If we do this, there is a high chance WW3 will start because Russia is a strong ally to Syria, and China is a good ally to Russia.
#17. Posted:
Singed
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 12, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 12, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16
Reputation Power: 0
SPACE_BOUND wrote Syria needs to learn they can't get away with this, we should still attack


They did not do it... are you blind?
#18. Posted:
Bankais
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,543
Reputation Power: 133
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,543
Reputation Power: 133
Something should be done to show that their actions won't be tolerated, but I don't think it should be sending troops. Good thing Im not the president.
#19. Posted:
Itech
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 187
Reputation Power: 7
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 187
Reputation Power: 7
I would like to firstly point out that I am not american... But I am seeing everyone saying the same thing "It is not our fight" , "not our problem". I would like to draw your attention to world war 2 where the Germans were slaughtering jews if countrys did not intervene then it would still be happening today, we cannot simply let innocent people die no matter WHERE OR WHO THEY ARE.
#20. Posted:
Joker
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,540
Reputation Power: 716
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,540
Reputation Power: 716
Itech wrote I would like to firstly point out that I am not american... But I am seeing everyone saying the same thing "It is not our fight" , "not our problem". I would like to draw your attention to world war 2 where the Germans were slaughtering jews if countrys did not intervene then it would still be happening today, we cannot simply let innocent people die no matter WHERE OR WHO THEY ARE.


I do not think that that would still be happening today.

I don't think we should intervene, simply because we don't need to. We're already fighting one war, why start another one? We didn't supply them with the chemical weapons, so we shouldn't worry about it. That's just my opinion.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.