You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#61. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 109
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 109
Reputation Power: 4
Okay how about 24? If not the riddle can only be solved on the toilet.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#62. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 368
Reputation Power: 14
Status: Offline
Joined: May 12, 201212Year Member
Posts: 368
Reputation Power: 14
there is an infinite number of squares
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#63. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,104
Reputation Power: 50
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,104
Reputation Power: 50
-Wil- wrote there is an infinite number of squares
That is incorrect.... the answer is not infinite
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#64. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 23, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,046
Reputation Power: 146
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 23, 200914Year Member
Posts: 3,046
Reputation Power: 146
You keep telling me in the shoutbox that isn't 28.
You have got to be kidding me.
If you take the 2 main squares set out, plus the 18 (9 + 9) inside squares, you have 20.
Using the black lines Boar showed like so;
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Adds an additional 8 squares to the total, making it 28. I've come to the conclusion that you are either too dumb for your own riddle, or you think that a rectangle counts as a square.
You have got to be kidding me.
If you take the 2 main squares set out, plus the 18 (9 + 9) inside squares, you have 20.
Using the black lines Boar showed like so;
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Adds an additional 8 squares to the total, making it 28. I've come to the conclusion that you are either too dumb for your own riddle, or you think that a rectangle counts as a square.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#65. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 6
It's 72. When you take the area of one side, multiply it by 4, then multiply that by two, you get 72 squares to to the multiplication based on area which is b*h\2 but in this case you reverse it, this riddle would be reverse sycology.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#66. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,104
Reputation Power: 50
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,104
Reputation Power: 50
Imagine_Dragons wrote It's 72. When you take the area of one side, multiply it by 4, then multiply that by two, you get 72 squares to to the multiplication based on area which is b*h\2 but in this case you reverse it, this riddle would be reverse sycology.
You are the closest person ever +Rep for you...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#67. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 6
Autocorrect wroteOh I thought I had it, I'll look at it again.Imagine_Dragons wrote It's 72. When you take the area of one side, multiply it by 4, then multiply that by two, you get 72 squares to to the multiplication based on area which is b*h\2 but in this case you reverse it, this riddle would be reverse sycology.
You are the closest person ever +Rep for you...
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#68. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,132
Reputation Power: 308
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,132
Reputation Power: 308
The answer is 74
However mathematically it is wrong, as as the guy above showed from my image, he didn't account for all values.
Oh well.
The way I got it was simple, I realized he was counting sides instead of squares.
And I was right -
Last edited by Boar ; edited 1 time in total
However mathematically it is wrong, as as the guy above showed from my image, he didn't account for all values.
Oh well.
The way I got it was simple, I realized he was counting sides instead of squares.
And I was right -
Autocorrect wrote 9*4 = 36, 36*2 = 74
Last edited by Boar ; edited 1 time in total
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#69. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,104
Reputation Power: 50
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,104
Reputation Power: 50
@Pint already solved it.. Great try guys I'll make one up another time lol
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#70. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 6
Autocorrect wrote @Boar already solved it.. Great try guys I'll make one up another time lolNoooo I forgot to add the two squares I'm so dumb, oh my god nooo
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.