You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
21
  • Summer 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Acro wrote here is a good build that could suit your needs-

Parts-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

windows 7-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Monitor-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Total-
$677.97 (not including shipping)

and you can get free 4-7 day shipping on windows 7 and the monitor. and shipping for your parts should be under $20(Should Be)
That's a pre-built and it sucks. This is the PC building section, don't recommend pre-builts to people, especially when they're that bad. It doesn't even have a GPU.

OP-The monitor EVCzBuRGR suggested is terrible, don't get it. The one you asked about is alright, but the one in the build I recommended is also perfectly fine, and it's $30 less expensive.
#12. Posted:
invalidaccount
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Sanctorum wrote

Why would you choose an i3 processor in a 700 dollar build? That's awful, it would be recommend to choose an AMD-FX 6300 over an i3 processor for this particular build. The AMD FX 6300 has six modular cores, whereas the i3 only has two true physical cores. As a bonus, the FX can be over clocked if you desired.
Altered build with an R9 270x instead of the R9 270.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#13. Posted:
21
  • Summer 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
invalidaccount wrote
Sanctorum wrote

Why would you choose an i3 processor in a 700 dollar build? That's awful, it would be recommend to choose an AMD-FX 6300 over an i3 processor for this particular build. The AMD FX 6300 has six modular cores, whereas the i3 only has two true physical cores. As a bonus, the FX can be over clocked if you desired.
Altered build with an R9 270x instead of the R9 270.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The FX-6300 has 3 physical modules and inside each are 2 cores. The FX-6300 isn't a true six core CPU like the Phenom X6's were. It's a $700 build that requires an OS and monitor, so the PC itself is around $500. It seems you just copied my build but changed the GPU, CPU and mobo. The R9 270 can be overclocked easily to the standards of the R9 270X. With the i3, OP can upgrade to an i5/i7 whenever he wants. With an FX-6300, he has 2 upgrade choices, an FX-8320 or an FX-9590. With Intel, there are several upgrade options.
#14. Posted:
invalidaccount
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Sanctorum wrote
invalidaccount wrote
Sanctorum wrote

Why would you choose an i3 processor in a 700 dollar build? That's awful, it would be recommend to choose an AMD-FX 6300 over an i3 processor for this particular build. The AMD FX 6300 has six modular cores, whereas the i3 only has two true physical cores. As a bonus, the FX can be over clocked if you desired.
Altered build with an R9 270x instead of the R9 270.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The FX-6300 has 3 physical modules and inside each are 2 cores. The FX-6300 isn't a true six core CPU like the Phenom X6's were. It's a $700 build that requires an OS and monitor, so the PC itself is around $500. It seems you just copied my build but changed the GPU, CPU and mobo. The R9 270 can be overclocked easily to the standards of the R9 270X. With the i3, OP can upgrade to an i5/i7 whenever he wants. With an FX-6300, he has 2 upgrade choices, an FX-8320 or an FX-9590. With Intel, there are several upgrade options.

That's what I said, the AMD FX has 6 modular cores (I forgot to place logical in there). The AMD FX 6300 is a more of a suitable processor for this particular build, the era of dual core gaming is far over. The AMD FX 6300 can withstand and do more impressive job than that of the i3 processor. [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] . Yes, I did use your build as a general reference to alter- hence I said "altered". I do agree with you on the obsolete socket, but it's still an impressive processor and AMD recently just announced a cheaper lower voltage 8xxx series processor, so this could hint for a refresh on the AM3+ socket.
#15. Posted:
21
  • Winter 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
invalidaccount wrote
Sanctorum wrote
invalidaccount wrote
Sanctorum wrote

Why would you choose an i3 processor in a 700 dollar build? That's awful, it would be recommend to choose an AMD-FX 6300 over an i3 processor for this particular build. The AMD FX 6300 has six modular cores, whereas the i3 only has two true physical cores. As a bonus, the FX can be over clocked if you desired.
Altered build with an R9 270x instead of the R9 270.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The FX-6300 has 3 physical modules and inside each are 2 cores. The FX-6300 isn't a true six core CPU like the Phenom X6's were. It's a $700 build that requires an OS and monitor, so the PC itself is around $500. It seems you just copied my build but changed the GPU, CPU and mobo. The R9 270 can be overclocked easily to the standards of the R9 270X. With the i3, OP can upgrade to an i5/i7 whenever he wants. With an FX-6300, he has 2 upgrade choices, an FX-8320 or an FX-9590. With Intel, there are several upgrade options.

That's what I said, the AMD FX has 6 modular cores (I forgot to place logical in there). The AMD FX 6300 is a more of a suitable processor for this particular build, the era of dual core gaming is far over. The AMD FX 6300 can withstand and do more impressive job than that of the i3 processor. [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] . Yes, I did use your build as a general reference to alter- hence I said "altered". I do agree with you on the obsolete socket, but it's still an impressive processor and AMD recently just announced a cheaper lower voltage 8xxx series processor, so this could hint for a refresh on the AM3+ socket.
Granted, AMD's FX series still have some good CPU's at good prices. However, it would be a much better choice to go with an i3 for upgradability to an i5/i7 at a later date. Intel's higher end CPU's beat all of AMD's FX series. I don't keep up to date with AMD CPU's that much, but "AMD recently just announced a cheaper lower voltage 8xxx series processor" that wasn't so recent, I heard about it a while ago. Even then, there is still more, and better upgrade room with Intel. If OP wanted he could get a Pentium G3258 and Z97 chipset motherboard, overclock it and it would beat the FX-6300 hands down.
#16. Posted:
invalidaccount
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201410Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Sanctorum wrote
invalidaccount wrote
Sanctorum wrote
invalidaccount wrote
Sanctorum wrote

Why would you choose an i3 processor in a 700 dollar build? That's awful, it would be recommend to choose an AMD-FX 6300 over an i3 processor for this particular build. The AMD FX 6300 has six modular cores, whereas the i3 only has two true physical cores. As a bonus, the FX can be over clocked if you desired.
Altered build with an R9 270x instead of the R9 270.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The FX-6300 has 3 physical modules and inside each are 2 cores. The FX-6300 isn't a true six core CPU like the Phenom X6's were. It's a $700 build that requires an OS and monitor, so the PC itself is around $500. It seems you just copied my build but changed the GPU, CPU and mobo. The R9 270 can be overclocked easily to the standards of the R9 270X. With the i3, OP can upgrade to an i5/i7 whenever he wants. With an FX-6300, he has 2 upgrade choices, an FX-8320 or an FX-9590. With Intel, there are several upgrade options.

That's what I said, the AMD FX has 6 modular cores (I forgot to place logical in there). The AMD FX 6300 is a more of a suitable processor for this particular build, the era of dual core gaming is far over. The AMD FX 6300 can withstand and do more impressive job than that of the i3 processor. [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] . Yes, I did use your build as a general reference to alter- hence I said "altered". I do agree with you on the obsolete socket, but it's still an impressive processor and AMD recently just announced a cheaper lower voltage 8xxx series processor, so this could hint for a refresh on the AM3+ socket.
Granted, AMD's FX series still have some good CPU's at good prices. However, it would be a much better choice to go with an i3 for upgradability to an i5/i7 at a later date. Intel's higher end CPU's beat all of AMD's FX series. I don't keep up to date with AMD CPU's that much, but "AMD recently just announced a cheaper lower voltage 8xxx series processor" that wasn't so recent, I heard about it a while ago. Even then, there is still more, and better upgrade room with Intel. If OP wanted he could get a Pentium G3258 and Z97 chipset motherboard, overclock it and it would beat the FX-6300 hands down.

You truly do make a valid point. The i3 processor would be a logical choice for an individual whom would want a basic processor that has the capability of being upgraded to an i5/i7. I guess there isn't hope in a new AM3+ processor resurfacing.
#17. Posted:
bburg321
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 424
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 424
Reputation Power: 16
Sanctorum wrote
Acro wrote here is a good build that could suit your needs-

Parts-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

windows 7-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Monitor-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Total-
$677.97 (not including shipping)

and you can get free 4-7 day shipping on windows 7 and the monitor. and shipping for your parts should be under $20(Should Be)
That's a pre-built and it sucks. This is the PC building section, don't recommend pre-builts to people, especially when they're that bad. It doesn't even have a GPU.

OP-The monitor EVCzBuRGR suggested is terrible, don't get it. The one you asked about is alright, but the one in the build I recommended is also perfectly fine, and it's $30 less expensive.

i suggested the acer in the build?
#18. Posted:
21
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 16,216
Reputation Power: 3087
Motto: Me big smarts. Brainy boy do learns much
EVCzBuRGR wrote
i suggested the acer in the build?
Apologies, my mistake. I meant the one that you linked in one of your posts. That one is a terrible monitor for its price.
#19. Posted:
bburg321
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 424
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 424
Reputation Power: 16
Sanctorum wrote
EVCzBuRGR wrote
i suggested the acer in the build?
Apologies, my mistake. I meant the one that you linked in one of your posts. That one is a terrible monitor for its price.

yeah thats the one i thought he was asking about, its the one i own and yes its a piece of junk
#20. Posted:
DeepVoiceAsian
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 11, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 11, 201410Year Member
Posts: 141
Reputation Power: 5
Acro wrote here is a good build that could suit your needs-

Parts-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

windows 7-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Monitor-
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Total-
$677.97 (not including shipping)

and you can get free 4-7 day shipping on windows 7 and the monitor. and shipping for your parts should be under $20(Should Be)


Is that a pre built computer ?
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.