Personally i think that its insane, nice work

thank you! i might start making GFX more often

Rough cutting around the image and the bevel emboss ruins it. Lower the opacity of the background image or blur it also remove remark and just leave your name.

First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

I agree with all this and I also hate the term "GFX"

I like it man looks good 20

Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

as illustrated shitted on the feedback i was going to give i shall say keep working on it for your first its honestly not at all bad

First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

I don't really like it if I am going to be honest. Also I would read Illustrated's post and learn off that should I say.