You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
My first ever GFX opinions anyone?
Posted:

My first ever GFX opinions anyone?Posted:

Vaporr
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
so this is the first gfx ive ever mad im going to use it for my twitter an YT what do you guys think of if?

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Last edited by Vaporr ; edited 1 time in total

The following 3 users thanked Vaporr for this useful post:

DankStorm- (03-31-2015), Abby (03-30-2015), Lash (03-30-2015)
#2. Posted:
Battlefront
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 734
Reputation Power: 34
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 734
Reputation Power: 34
Personally i think that its insane, nice work
#3. Posted:
Vaporr
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
thank you! i might start making GFX more often
#4. Posted:
Averul
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Rough cutting around the image and the bevel emboss ruins it. Lower the opacity of the background image or blur it also remove remark and just leave your name.
#5. Posted:
Illustrated
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
#6. Posted:
Averul
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.


I agree with all this and I also hate the term "GFX"
#7. Posted:
Cr8iv
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 65
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 65
Reputation Power: 5
I like it man looks good 20
#8. Posted:
Perverse
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,618
Reputation Power: 279
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,618
Reputation Power: 279
Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.


as illustrated shitted on the feedback i was going to give i shall say keep working on it for your first its honestly not at all bad
#9. Posted:
Production
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 277
Reputation Power: 294
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 277
Reputation Power: 294
First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
#10. Posted:
1989
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 8,349
Reputation Power: 365
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 8,349
Reputation Power: 365
I don't really like it if I am going to be honest. Also I would read Illustrated's post and learn off that should I say.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.