You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
My first ever GFX opinions anyone?
Posted:
My first ever GFX opinions anyone?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 734
Reputation Power: 34
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 201113Year Member
Posts: 734
Reputation Power: 34
Personally i think that its insane, nice work
- 2useful
- 4not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: May 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 93
Reputation Power: 3
thank you! i might start making GFX more often
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Rough cutting around the image and the bevel emboss ruins it. Lower the opacity of the background image or blur it also remove remark and just leave your name.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.
On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).
The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.
The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.
The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.
The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.
The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.
I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.
On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).
The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.
The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.
The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.
The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.
The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.
I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
- 7useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 20, 201212Year Member
Posts: 783
Reputation Power: 40
Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.
On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).
The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.
The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.
The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.
The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.
The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.
I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
I agree with all this and I also hate the term "GFX"
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 65
Reputation Power: 5
I like it man looks good 20
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,618
Reputation Power: 279
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 5,618
Reputation Power: 279
Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.
On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).
The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.
The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.
The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.
The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.
The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.
I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
as illustrated shitted on the feedback i was going to give i shall say keep working on it for your first its honestly not at all bad
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 277
Reputation Power: 294
Status: Offline
Joined: May 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 277
Reputation Power: 294
First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.
On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).
The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.
The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.
The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.
The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.
The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.
I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.
On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).
The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.
The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.
The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.
The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.
The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.
I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.
- 1useful
- 4not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 8,349
Reputation Power: 365
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 09, 201311Year Member
Posts: 8,349
Reputation Power: 365
I don't really like it if I am going to be honest. Also I would read Illustrated's post and learn off that should I say.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.