Meh its okay overall but for your first time its decent.

my dislikes is the bevel & emboss you have used on the text and the color you used too.

4/10

Production wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

do you just go round copying peoples posts?

Holy shit that's dope great job 11/10

Averul wrote

Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

I agree with all this and I also hate the term "GFX"

It's funny like seeing GfX , I'd usually say designer or artist! My sig is mocking the Gfx so bad ahahah

First ever?....

Not bad, just pleased you never called it a logo.

Keep it up.

Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

Although I agree with what you say, I think you lose all credibility by typing your post like a god damn poem. You're not Nelligan or Beaudelaire so stop doing that.

lel wrote

Illustrated wrote First I just want to say the term "gfx" is so annoying.
In reality only amateurs and people who don't even know what they're doing say it.

On topic though.
I would highly disagree with the "it's insane" comment.
In my personal opinion it's sub-par, if not average (in relation to this forums general skill anyway).

The gradient on the text makes the bottom too dark.
It's hard to read with 1/3 the letters basically invisible.
It's just too strong of a gradient too.
Subtlety is good for gradients.

The placement of the images is bad.
It looks like he's holding onto the cross like it's a big wooden sword.

The background image is not very good.
The quality is bad on it.
The proportions of the moon are skewed.
It looks too grungey.
There's a big white blob behind his head? What is that...
Not to mention I can still see the watermark on it.

The logo. You have a subtle gradient on it.
Like I said subtlety is good.
However the colors are horrible.
That rainbow gradient is a nono.

The color scheme in general is off.
Nothing blends. It doesn't mesh.
You have blue lighting on his arm. Redness in his center. A green-ish background. Rainbow over the logo... It's a **** of color.

I'd suggest sticking with a few complimenting colors, and stick with that.

Although I agree with what you say, I think you lose all credibility by typing your post like a god damn poem. You're not Nelligan or Beaudelaire so stop doing that.

He separated it into pieces so you could see what goes with what.



You don't have to be a poet to use common sense.