liathewolf wrote

Kingsman wrote

liathewolf wrote

Lavish wrote

liathewolf wrote My opinion, the us government planned it they showed subliminal messages in tv shows before 9/11 happened so i think the whole thing was a conspiracy.

Please tell me why the government would place subliminal messages in TV shows that they were going to create a false flag such as 9/11?

What would they have to gain from doing that?

you tell me?

The burden of proof is on you to lay out your reasoning.
Why would they risk exposing themselves, and how do you suppose the conversations went with the animators on these shows?
Did they just ring them up and subtly ask them implement foreshadowing of a future disaster, hoping they would stay quiet about it?

Fair enough, i know what your trying to say but it is not like it is a coincidence.

I think that's exactly what it is.
It's easy to point at things in hindsight and form a pattern.

Like Lavish said, if there was a terrorist attack on the White House would you say that films like White House Down and Olympus Has Fallen were foreshadowing it?
Furthermore, would you say that those films were evidence of a Government conspiracy?
I doubt it.

I think it was the government wanting us to go to war

I've been reading through some of the comments and don't understand why people make out you're a nut job conspiracy theorist if you believe it was set up.

Architects, scientists, engineers, physicists, the head structural engineer of the world trade centre all believe it was a set up.

Also don't understand why people say "why would the US government do that do themselves?" It's pretty obvious, attack your own country so you can attack other places you want, that gives them a reason.

"Demolish"
Inspired by this song,

Click to View Content

I believe government behind it.

Illuminati Behind it all

It doesn't even make sense to say that Bush was behind 9/11.
The hijackers were at flight training getting ready for the attacks before he was even President.

Lavish wrote It doesn't even make sense to say that Bush was behind 9/11.
The hijackers were at flight training getting ready for the attacks before he was even President.

There's people higher up than the presidents imo and in the opinions of a lot of smart men also.

One of the buildings collapsed on it's own, how is that explainable?

I seen a documentary on it and one of the architects, can't remember his name, watched it a long time ago, said that the way the buildings came down wasn't natural and shouldn't of came down the way that they did, he was implying the buildings were rigged with explosives.

There's too much shit that doesn't add up, not a chance in hell the building that was hit fell down the way it did, let alone the building that wasn't hit.

ikhalifaai wrote

Lavish wrote It doesn't even make sense to say that Bush was behind 9/11.
The hijackers were at flight training getting ready for the attacks before he was even President.

There's people higher up than the presidents imo and in the opinions of a lot of smart men also.

One of the buildings collapsed on it's own, how is that explainable?

I seen a documentary on it and one of the architects, can't remember his name, watched it a long time ago, said that the way the buildings came down wasn't natural and shouldn't of came down the way that they did, he was implying the buildings were rigged with explosives.

There's too much shit that doesn't add up, not a chance in hell the building that was hit fell down the way it did, let alone the building that wasn't hit.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

That site will debunk every argument you can come up with in one fell swoop.

Here's a thought, a plane hits a building and knocks it to the ground. Simple right?
Everyone is trying to work out something that is plain as day. Planes hijacked, crashed into towers.
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams? Maybe so, but the impact can definitely break the beams.

Lavish wrote

ikhalifaai wrote

Lavish wrote It doesn't even make sense to say that Bush was behind 9/11.
The hijackers were at flight training getting ready for the attacks before he was even President.

There's people higher up than the presidents imo and in the opinions of a lot of smart men also.

One of the buildings collapsed on it's own, how is that explainable?

I seen a documentary on it and one of the architects, can't remember his name, watched it a long time ago, said that the way the buildings came down wasn't natural and shouldn't of came down the way that they did, he was implying the buildings were rigged with explosives.

There's too much shit that doesn't add up, not a chance in hell the building that was hit fell down the way it did, let alone the building that wasn't hit.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

That site will debunk every argument you can come up with in one fell swoop.

I'll give this a read which will take a while but the first link I clicked it's just attacking Alex Jones, would not be surprised in the slightest if someone from the government wrote this.

ikhalifaai wrote I'll give this a read which will take a while but the first link I clicked it's just attacking Alex Jones, would not be surprised in the slightest if someone from the government wrote this.

Where do you see them attacking Alex Jones?
Alex Jones complimented them and they featured it on their website with no added comment.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

If you're referring to the WTC 7 link, that is not attacking.
That is debunking a claim. There were no personal attacks at him.