You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
MusiQ wrote I hate to say it but cancer is a 124.6 billion doller industry, If there was a cure.. i doubt it would be released to anyone who isn't 'special'
This is implying that everyone working on the cure was a sociopath and were able to do it with a minimal staff of 10 or less.
The development stages of a cure for cancer couldn't be compartmentalized enough to keep it from being leaked by a scientist with a conscience.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,259
Reputation Power: 9074
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 13, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,259
Reputation Power: 9074
MusiQ wrote I hate to say it but cancer is a 124.6 billion doller industry, If there was a cure.. i doubt it would be released to anyone who isn't 'special'
Two words: Edward Snowden.
You do the math..
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
Lavish wroteMusiQ wrote I hate to say it but cancer is a 124.6 billion doller industry, If there was a cure.. i doubt it would be released to anyone who isn't 'special'
This is implying that everyone working on the cure was a sociopath and were able to do it with a minimal staff of 10 or less.
The development stages of a cure for cancer couldn't be compartmentalized enough to keep it from being leaked by a scientist with a conscience.
Ok i understand what your saying, I hope what you are saying is true.. But do you think you are the only person who thinks like that? if what i am saying is true and these company's or governments are as money absorbing as i think they are, Then scientists would be hand picked and most likely forced to sign some type of confidentiality agreement. Lets be honest here, How do you know there are not cures for cancer and different diseases but the only people who see them are the richest or the family of those in control ( president ect. )
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
RIAA wroteMusiQ wrote I hate to say it but cancer is a 124.6 billion doller industry, If there was a cure.. i doubt it would be released to anyone who isn't 'special'
Two words: Edward Snowden.
You do the math..
Edward snowden? Is he not facing felony charges? correct me if i am wrong but that is not exactly motivation for someone to do the same as him
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201311Year Member
Posts: 4,037
Reputation Power: 4201
The cure will never be released, do you know how much money they get from charities and things? ALOT!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 28, 20159Year Member
Posts: 1,182
Reputation Power: 1852
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 28, 20159Year Member
Posts: 1,182
Reputation Power: 1852
I heard a rumor of a cure for cancer that someone found out but due to him not being a Chemist or Doctor. I think the government don't tell people due to it keeping population control in the world sadly. Sorry for your losses and if you need to talk about it just PM me.
~XeDrips~
~XeDrips~
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
MusiQ wrote Then scientists would be hand picked and most likely forced to sign some type of confidentiality agreement.
Every whistleblower ever to exist signed a confidentiality agreement at one point.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,128
Reputation Power: 54
Lavish wroteMusiQ wrote Then scientists would be hand picked and most likely forced to sign some type of confidentiality agreement.
Every whistleblower ever to exist signed a confidentiality agreement at one point.
Yes but there are consequences for braking those agreements, Yes if it was me then i would happily sacrifice my freedom for the life's of millions , But you never know these days with the government.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,514
Reputation Power: 136
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,514
Reputation Power: 136
Harmski wroteBoston-Bruins wroteI'm saying that smoking is wrong on so many levels and that maybe they wouldn't make the same mistake again after their cancer is "resolved"Harmski wrote Well Cancer is a slut so I think people would stop smoking because of how bad it is, causing the US to lose money.
So you're saying that people smoke now knowing that they could die from cancer, but people wouldn't smoke if they knew cancer could be cured? Hmmmmm...
People won't make that mistake again if they die off cancer either..
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,649
Reputation Power: 172
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 3,649
Reputation Power: 172
I think that there is a cure but it would cost governments more money to give out that than they're already paying to treat cancer. Why cure something they make money from? Sick minded people.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.