You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Jamy
  • Fairy Master
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,512
Reputation Power: 2819
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,512
Reputation Power: 2819
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote american gun controls seem to be really working this year


Criminals choosing not to follow the law? I would've never thought that possible.

or just use uk gun laws. we seem to be doing alright


That'd require mass confiscation, which is rightfully illegal. Which still wouldn't work lol

im sure the gov would make it legal if it needed to be
#12. Posted:
Tywin
  • Gold Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote american gun controls seem to be really working this year


Criminals choosing not to follow the law? I would've never thought that possible.

or just use uk gun laws. we seem to be doing alright


That'd require mass confiscation, which is rightfully illegal. Which still wouldn't work lol

im sure the gov would make it legal if it needed to be


Our constitution protects us from confiscation. Confiscation would only benefit criminals.
Law abiding people would be the only ones to turn in their weapons, all while criminals are keeping theirs and having the black market value for firearms skyrocket.
#13. Posted:
Jamy
  • Summer 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,512
Reputation Power: 2819
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,512
Reputation Power: 2819
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote american gun controls seem to be really working this year


Criminals choosing not to follow the law? I would've never thought that possible.

or just use uk gun laws. we seem to be doing alright


That'd require mass confiscation, which is rightfully illegal. Which still wouldn't work lol

im sure the gov would make it legal if it needed to be


Our constitution protects us from confiscation. Confiscation would only benefit criminals.
Law abiding people would be the only ones to turn in their weapons, all while criminals are keeping theirs and having the black market value for firearms skyrocket.

so you were **** from when the constitution came in. unlucky
#14. Posted:
Braviary
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 764
Reputation Power: 35
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 764
Reputation Power: 35
What the hell goes through peoples minds when they are planning to do this and when they actually do it, I hate to say it but there is a lot of people like that in the world its never gonna stop. It's scary...
#15. Posted:
LieutenantGaz
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Jamy wrote american gun controls seem to be really working this year


I know right. That makes it our 353rd mass shooting this year. How lovely. All of these stupid right wingers will never understand that more guns equals more problems. They think that laws are pointless because some will break them. This kind of stuff really angers me but the majority of Americans just don't even care. We used to be horrified of these things. But now? Just another mass shooting to moan about for an hour and then forget about it. Talk about disgusting..
#16. Posted:
LieutenantGaz
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote
Lavish wrote
Jamy wrote american gun controls seem to be really working this year


Criminals choosing not to follow the law? I would've never thought that possible.

or just use uk gun laws. we seem to be doing alright


That'd require mass confiscation, which is rightfully illegal. Which still wouldn't work lol

im sure the gov would make it legal if it needed to be


Our constitution protects us from confiscation. Confiscation would only benefit criminals.
Law abiding people would be the only ones to turn in their weapons, all while criminals are keeping theirs and having the black market value for firearms skyrocket.


You do understand that most all of the mass shootings committed are committed with weapons bought legally right? With little to no background checks preformed. And that gun control isn't synonymous will gun confiscation?

Nuance is hard amirite??
#17. Posted:
Tywin
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 12,347
Reputation Power: 632
-Belial wrote You do understand that most all of the mass shootings committed are committed with weapons bought legally right? With little to no background checks preformed. And that gun control isn't synonymous will gun confiscation?

Nuance is hard amirite??


Where is your source for most mass shootings happening with legally owned firearms?

I never said that gun control is synonymous with gun confiscation. I said that to have the same gun laws that the UK has would require mass confiscation.
#18. Posted:
Dxminic
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 16, 201014Year Member
Posts: 866
Reputation Power: 138
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 16, 201014Year Member
Posts: 866
Reputation Power: 138
Its just sickening how far humanity has come to acts like this anymore.

Prayers to make sure everyone is safe.
#19. Posted:
BigRedMachine
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
ABC News is reporting that up to 12 people have been killed in a mass shooting a California community centre.

Update if you want to add
#20. Posted:
LieutenantGaz
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Lavish wrote
-Belial wrote You do understand that most all of the mass shootings committed are committed with weapons bought legally right? With little to no background checks preformed. And that gun control isn't synonymous will gun confiscation?

Nuance is hard amirite??


Where is your source for most mass shootings happening with legally owned firearms?

I never said that gun control is synonymous with gun confiscation. I said that to have the same gun laws that the UK has would require mass confiscation.


I'm not going to do your research for you. Take the time to search it up yourself.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.