You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 20159Year Member
Posts: 413
Reputation Power: 26
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,877
Reputation Power: 110
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 16, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,877
Reputation Power: 110
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7349
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 201410Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7349
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
So 232 HP and 574 torque for anyone wandering. Terrible ratio though, you need less torque or more HP in my opinion unless you're trying to tow something then those numbers are alright.
To me that's useless on a car, but not my car, not my problem. You lost 3 hp and gained a lot of torque. For that amount of torque, your HP should be at least 300, but more around 350. I'm not trying to be a hater, just a realist. My brother has a 2013 Mustang V6, his car (according to Google) makes 305 HP and 280 torque. His car gets up to 120 before the governor in his car won't let him go any faster. On your sheet of paper making over double the amount of torque he is shows your top speed is 109.
So 232 HP and 574 torque for anyone wandering. Terrible ratio though, you need less torque or more HP in my opinion unless you're trying to tow something then those numbers are alright.
To me that's useless on a car, but not my car, not my problem. You lost 3 hp and gained a lot of torque. For that amount of torque, your HP should be at least 300, but more around 350. I'm not trying to be a hater, just a realist. My brother has a 2013 Mustang V6, his car (according to Google) makes 305 HP and 280 torque. His car gets up to 120 before the governor in his car won't let him go any faster. On your sheet of paper making over double the amount of torque he is shows your top speed is 109.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,166
Reputation Power: 149
Looks lovely, I like it a lot. 9/10
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 14, 201410Year Member
Posts: 1,193
Reputation Power: 85
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
So 232 HP and 574 torque for anyone wandering. Terrible ratio though, you need less torque or more HP in my opinion unless you're trying to tow something then those numbers are alright.
To me that's useless on a car, but not my car, not my problem. You lost 3 hp and gained a lot of torque. For that amount of torque, your HP should be at least 300, but more around 350. I'm not trying to be a hater, just a realist. My brother has a 2013 Mustang V6, his car (according to Google) makes 305 HP and 280 torque. His car gets up to 120 before the governor in his car won't let him go any faster. On your sheet of paper making over double the amount of torque he is shows your top speed is 109.
i agree, that is a terrible ratio. all that torque for what type of top end? Maybe he does 60ft contests, who knows.
So 232 HP and 574 torque for anyone wandering. Terrible ratio though, you need less torque or more HP in my opinion unless you're trying to tow something then those numbers are alright.
To me that's useless on a car, but not my car, not my problem. You lost 3 hp and gained a lot of torque. For that amount of torque, your HP should be at least 300, but more around 350. I'm not trying to be a hater, just a realist. My brother has a 2013 Mustang V6, his car (according to Google) makes 305 HP and 280 torque. His car gets up to 120 before the governor in his car won't let him go any faster. On your sheet of paper making over double the amount of torque he is shows your top speed is 109.
i agree, that is a terrible ratio. all that torque for what type of top end? Maybe he does 60ft contests, who knows.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,013
Reputation Power: 53
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,013
Reputation Power: 53
it is a diesel so thats a lot of torque
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 01, 20168Year Member
Posts: 3,704
Reputation Power: 1024
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 01, 20168Year Member
Posts: 3,704
Reputation Power: 1024
I really like it dude. I'd definitely drive it
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,275
Reputation Power: 57
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,275
Reputation Power: 57
We use Newton metres in the UK not FT-LBS, So sounds about right, still a messed up ratio though.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,447
Reputation Power: 149
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,447
Reputation Power: 149
Think I'm going to et a BMW for my next car they're so nice and got a good bit of speed...my 1.8l Astra just doesn't cut it
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 31,557
Reputation Power: 15112
You have a beautiful ride man.
8/10
8/10
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.