You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Aced
  • Winter 2021
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,334
Reputation Power: 1183
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,334
Reputation Power: 1183
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi

Ah i see you have been brainwashed.Probably mainstream media. Syria has not and never will use chemical weapons. US of course blamed Assad... Without any proof yet again. Syria government is just as bad as isis? LMFAO where are you living you moron. Syria is fighting ISIS and other us terrorist groups "aka rebels" Please dont talk on matter that you have no actual information on except biased media.
Moron? You better watch your god damn mouth. Where do you get your information? I have been to Afghanistan and been shot at on a daily basis. So i am a bit more informed then you are.

Go and do research, Assad has used chemical weapons multiple times against civilians. CIVILIANS LIVING THERE even have said that the Syrian military used chemical weapons.
So before you go and start calling people morons, do research and find facts.


Afghanistan and Syria are 2 different things buddy. But in reality they have the same bases/causes invasions by Nato and its allies. Just because you have been to war does not mean you are more informed WHATSOEVER. Because Afghanistan and Syria are two different things.
Who told you syria used chemical weapons? Mainstream media. The same media that said their was "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" while we helped saddam gas iran?
Where is the proof? NO ONE HAS PROVIDED ANY PROOF of Assad using chemical weapons, you are really just being tricked and fooled by mainstream media, its a shame. Why would Assad gas his own people and not terrorist? And the terrorist were advancing the day before on that territory why didn't Assad gas the terrorist then? Why would he gas his own people when he started gaining territory? The chemical attack was a false flag used as a pretext for war, but trump didn't invade he sent a strike. Please gain more knowledge on a subject before you try to comment with false information
#12. Posted:
Glock-
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,245
Reputation Power: 257
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,245
Reputation Power: 257
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi

Ah i see you have been brainwashed.Probably mainstream media. Syria has not and never will use chemical weapons. US of course blamed Assad... Without any proof yet again. Syria government is just as bad as isis? LMFAO where are you living you moron. Syria is fighting ISIS and other us terrorist groups "aka rebels" Please dont talk on matter that you have no actual information on except biased media.
Moron? You better watch your god damn mouth. Where do you get your information? I have been to Afghanistan and been shot at on a daily basis. So i am a bit more informed then you are.

Go and do research, Assad has used chemical weapons multiple times against civilians. CIVILIANS LIVING THERE even have said that the Syrian military used chemical weapons.
So before you go and start calling people morons, do research and find facts.


Afghanistan and Syria are 2 different things buddy. But in reality they have the same bases/causes invasions by Nato and its allies. Just because you have been to war does not mean you are more informed WHATSOEVER. Because Afghanistan and Syria are two different things.
Who told you syria used chemical weapons? Mainstream media. The same media that said their was "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" while we helped saddam gas iran?
Where is the proof? NO ONE HAS PROVIDED ANY PROOF of Assad using chemical weapons, you are really just being tricked and fooled by mainstream media, its a shame. Why would Assad gas his own people and not terrorist? And the terrorist were advancing the day before on that territory why didn't Assad gas the terrorist then? Why would he gas his own people when he started gaining territory? The chemical attack was a false flag used as a pretext for war, but trump didn't invade he sent a strike. Please gain more knowledge on a subject before you try to comment with false information
I am very aware of that they are two different countries. And I am informed because I know people were currently in Syria training rebel forces. It has been proven that s it has been proven that assad has executed civilians for failing to leave the city. It's pretty damn clear that she has used chemical weapons against civilians it's pretty damn clear that he has used chemical weapons against civilians because the rebels have not used chemical weapons because they are not in possession of chemical weapons. You're making me start to believe that you're the type of person who still believes 9/11 was an inside job. Opinion and fact are two different things. Do you not remember that video that was posted online about five or six years ago of Syrian forces shooting and killing 20 people inside of a village. The two survivors were rescued and they were on CNN and FOX. The Syrian government is beyond corrupt. The Syrian government is almost as bad as the situation was in Libya.
#13. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Summer 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Vancouver_Canucks wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi

Ah i see you have been brainwashed.Probably mainstream media. Syria has not and never will use chemical weapons. US of course blamed Assad... Without any proof yet again. Syria government is just as bad as isis? LMFAO where are you living you moron. Syria is fighting ISIS and other us terrorist groups "aka rebels" Please dont talk on matter that you have no actual information on except biased media.
Moron? You better watch your god damn mouth. Where do you get your information? I have been to Afghanistan and been shot at on a daily basis. So i am a bit more informed then you are.

Go and do research, Assad has used chemical weapons multiple times against civilians. CIVILIANS LIVING THERE even have said that the Syrian military used chemical weapons.
So before you go and start calling people morons, do research and find facts.
The rebels are saying Assad is using Chemical Weapons, the recurring instances of children and civilians being treated for Chemical related injuries.. Everyone knows Russia supplies Syria with the Chemical Weapons so it would ultimately be foolish to dismiss any accusation of the Government using such weapons when there's so many people against them!


That's true, but the US has access to white phosphorous, it's not strictly speaking illegal, despite being a chemical weapon, but it's use is prohibited in civilian areas - and civilians as well as human rights organisations have accused the US-led coalition of using white phosphorous in Raqqa, an area which is still home to thousands of civilians.

So are we basing the idea that the Syrian Government is as bad as ISIS on the accusations that they used chemical weapons on civilian populations?
Because by that logic, so is the US.

Glock, you can say that you know people but it'd much easier if you just provided him with this undeniable proof.
Saying that you know people and they told you so isn't going to convince him that he's wrong. He just won't believe you.

Glock wrote it's pretty damn clear that he has used chemical weapons against civilians because the rebels have not used chemical weapons because they are not in possession of chemical weapons.


That's not true. Multiple chemical weapon attacks have been attributed to Syrian Opposition forces.
#14. Posted:
Aced
  • Fairy Master
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,334
Reputation Power: 1183
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,334
Reputation Power: 1183
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi

Ah i see you have been brainwashed.Probably mainstream media. Syria has not and never will use chemical weapons. US of course blamed Assad... Without any proof yet again. Syria government is just as bad as isis? LMFAO where are you living you moron. Syria is fighting ISIS and other us terrorist groups "aka rebels" Please dont talk on matter that you have no actual information on except biased media.
Moron? You better watch your god damn mouth. Where do you get your information? I have been to Afghanistan and been shot at on a daily basis. So i am a bit more informed then you are.

Go and do research, Assad has used chemical weapons multiple times against civilians. CIVILIANS LIVING THERE even have said that the Syrian military used chemical weapons.
So before you go and start calling people morons, do research and find facts.


Afghanistan and Syria are 2 different things buddy. But in reality they have the same bases/causes invasions by Nato and its allies. Just because you have been to war does not mean you are more informed WHATSOEVER. Because Afghanistan and Syria are two different things.
Who told you syria used chemical weapons? Mainstream media. The same media that said their was "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" while we helped saddam gas iran?
Where is the proof? NO ONE HAS PROVIDED ANY PROOF of Assad using chemical weapons, you are really just being tricked and fooled by mainstream media, its a shame. Why would Assad gas his own people and not terrorist? And the terrorist were advancing the day before on that territory why didn't Assad gas the terrorist then? Why would he gas his own people when he started gaining territory? The chemical attack was a false flag used as a pretext for war, but trump didn't invade he sent a strike. Please gain more knowledge on a subject before you try to comment with false information
I am very aware of that they are two different countries. And I am informed because I know people were currently in Syria training rebel forces. It has been proven that s it has been proven that assad has executed civilians for failing to leave the city. It's pretty damn clear that she has used chemical weapons against civilians it's pretty damn clear that he has used chemical weapons against civilians because the rebels have not used chemical weapons because they are not in possession of chemical weapons. You're making me start to believe that you're the type of person who still believes 9/11 was an inside job. Opinion and fact are two different things. Do you not remember that video that was posted online about five or six years ago of Syrian forces shooting and killing 20 people inside of a village. The two survivors were rescued and they were on CNN and FOX. The Syrian government is beyond corrupt. The Syrian government is almost as bad as the situation was in Libya.

Let me give you some information. I have been personally watching this conflict and searching information/reading doing my own research since the war started. Not on a daily bases, every now and then type thing. Because learning from other countries this same problem has occured in i was curious to find out what is going on. Are they really all that bad dictators? Or what is really going on here was my main concern of finding out. Now i am not saying Assad or Qaddafi are angels they arent no one perfect. But as far as Iraq goes and Libya if their leaders were still alive half of this shit wouldn't be happening, extremist wouldn't have gone this far. How many terrorist attacks were in Iraq when Saddam was in power? Now tell me how many terrorist attacks are happening in Iraq daily? Did we really go to Iraq and try to bring democracy and peace and to find WMD, that we still have not yet found. Yet we helped Iraq GAS iran... But we were worried about iraq having WMD?

Now to enlighten you on Syria. Its a proxy war with NATO and some other middle eastern countries all stirring the pot. Assad isn't a dictator. See with iraq and in the past we would invade countries right? By sending our troops on the ground. But now its different. Basically instead of sending our soliders to fight, the "globalist" "elites" whatever you wanna call them have a new strategy of taking over countries. They pay and train terrorist AKA "REBELS" to do the dirty work for them and so that by calling them rebels it makes USA/ALLIES look like the good guys and the public wont worry about funding them. Please look at syria before and after war. It was a secular democracy. All religions living in peace. The west stirred up anti Assad riots and basically caused the civil war. Then america decided to fund terrorist which they refer to as "rebels" but you do know half of the "rebels" are foreign right? they arent Syrian which prooves majority of the syrians love their president. But onto the fact those rebels came from other terrorist groups like Al Queada etc and called themselves 'FSA" so the public wont be worried. How did assad win his election in 2014 if he is a dictator?
Sorry but USA illegally attacked syria and continues to do so. All while providing no proof that Assad used chemical weapons.

To sum it up Assad is fighting against terrorist which the west refers to as "rebels"
If you still honestly think Assad is the bad guy, Pm and we can have a discussion instead of spamming this forum posting up.
On a side note please watch Bashar Al Assad's interviews and gain some knowledge. Lets not fall for the same trap as we did in Iraq,Afghan,Libya,etc
#15. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Summer 2019
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi

Ah i see you have been brainwashed.Probably mainstream media. Syria has not and never will use chemical weapons. US of course blamed Assad... Without any proof yet again. Syria government is just as bad as isis? LMFAO where are you living you moron. Syria is fighting ISIS and other us terrorist groups "aka rebels" Please dont talk on matter that you have no actual information on except biased media.
Moron? You better watch your god damn mouth. Where do you get your information? I have been to Afghanistan and been shot at on a daily basis. So i am a bit more informed then you are.

Go and do research, Assad has used chemical weapons multiple times against civilians. CIVILIANS LIVING THERE even have said that the Syrian military used chemical weapons.
So before you go and start calling people morons, do research and find facts.


Afghanistan and Syria are 2 different things buddy. But in reality they have the same bases/causes invasions by Nato and its allies. Just because you have been to war does not mean you are more informed WHATSOEVER. Because Afghanistan and Syria are two different things.
Who told you syria used chemical weapons? Mainstream media. The same media that said their was "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" while we helped saddam gas iran?
Where is the proof? NO ONE HAS PROVIDED ANY PROOF of Assad using chemical weapons, you are really just being tricked and fooled by mainstream media, its a shame. Why would Assad gas his own people and not terrorist? And the terrorist were advancing the day before on that territory why didn't Assad gas the terrorist then? Why would he gas his own people when he started gaining territory? The chemical attack was a false flag used as a pretext for war, but trump didn't invade he sent a strike. Please gain more knowledge on a subject before you try to comment with false information
I am very aware of that they are two different countries. And I am informed because I know people were currently in Syria training rebel forces. It has been proven that s it has been proven that assad has executed civilians for failing to leave the city. It's pretty damn clear that she has used chemical weapons against civilians it's pretty damn clear that he has used chemical weapons against civilians because the rebels have not used chemical weapons because they are not in possession of chemical weapons. You're making me start to believe that you're the type of person who still believes 9/11 was an inside job. Opinion and fact are two different things. Do you not remember that video that was posted online about five or six years ago of Syrian forces shooting and killing 20 people inside of a village. The two survivors were rescued and they were on CNN and FOX. The Syrian government is beyond corrupt. The Syrian government is almost as bad as the situation was in Libya.

Let me give you some information. I have been personally watching this conflict and searching information/reading doing my own research since the war started. Not on a daily bases, every now and then type thing. Because learning from other countries this same problem has occured in i was curious to find out what is going on. Are they really all that bad dictators? Or what is really going on here was my main concern of finding out. Now i am not saying Assad or Qaddafi are angels they arent no one perfect. But as far as Iraq goes and Libya if their leaders were still alive half of this shit wouldn't be happening, extremist wouldn't have gone this far. How many terrorist attacks were in Iraq when Saddam was in power? Now tell me how many terrorist attacks are happening in Iraq daily? Did we really go to Iraq and try to bring democracy and peace and to find WMD, that we still have not yet found. Yet we helped Iraq GAS iran... But we were worried about iraq having WMD?

Now to enlighten you on Syria. Its a proxy war with NATO and some other middle eastern countries all stirring the pot. Assad isn't a dictator. See with iraq and in the past we would invade countries right? By sending our troops on the ground. But now its different. Basically instead of sending our soliders to fight, the "globalist" "elites" whatever you wanna call them have a new strategy of taking over countries. They pay and train terrorist AKA "REBELS" to do the dirty work for them and so that by calling them rebels it makes USA/ALLIES look like the good guys and the public wont worry about funding them. Please look at syria before and after war. It was a secular democracy. All religions living in peace. The west stirred up anti Assad riots and basically caused the civil war. Then america decided to fund terrorist which they refer to as "rebels" but you do know half of the "rebels" are foreign right? they arent Syrian which prooves majority of the syrians love their president. But onto the fact those rebels came from other terrorist groups like Al Queada etc and called themselves 'FSA" so the public wont be worried. How did assad win his election in 2014 if he is a dictator?
Sorry but USA illegally attacked syria and continues to do so. All while providing no proof that Assad used chemical weapons.


This is all i'm replying to here so don't think I'm saying that everything you just said is worthless, but this annoys me from people on the left, as someone on the left:

How many terrorist attacks were in Iraq when Saddam was in power? Now tell me how many terrorist attacks are happening in Iraq daily?


Don't downplay how horrific Saddam was and act like things were better off with him in power.
His campaigns saw hundreds of thousands of innocents killed.

People like Saddam Hussein can't be the last line of defense against groups like Al Qaeda.

Along with other human rights organizations, The Documental Centre for Human Rights in Iraq has compiled documentation on over 600,000 civilian executions in Iraq. Human Rights Watch reports that in one operation alone, the Anfal, Saddam killed 100,000 Kurdish Iraqis. Another 500,000 are estimated to have died in Saddam's needless war with Iran. Coldly taken as a daily average for the 24 years of Saddam's reign, these numbers give us a horrifying picture of between 70 and 125 civilian deaths per day for every one of Saddam's 8,000-odd days in power

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Also, this proposed US support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war is as circumstantial and unproven as the accusations that the Syrian Government is using chemical weapons.

The US never sold arms directly to Iraq during this period. They provided economic aid, military intelligence, and technology, but compared to countries like Russia their contribution to this war effort was near enough non-existent. France, China, Poland and Brazil all provided Iraq with more armaments than the US during this period.

And let's not act like Iran was innocent with their support of insurgencies by the likes of Hezbollah.
#16. Posted:
Miss
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi


You can't sit here and play the moral judge when Assad and ISIS don't even come close to the amount of civilians we have killed.

On topic, I highly doubt Russia will do anything about our planes, they didn't even do anything to Turkey when they shot down their plane.

It's just odd that only we can violate International Law. World would probably be a better place otherwise.
#17. Posted:
Glock-
  • Winter 2020
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,245
Reputation Power: 257
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,245
Reputation Power: 257
Miss wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi


You can't sit here and play the moral judge when Assad and ISIS don't even come close to the amount of civilians we have killed.

On topic, I highly doubt Russia will do anything about our planes, they didn't even do anything to Turkey when they shot down their plane.

It's just odd that only we can violate International Law. World would probably be a better place otherwise.
Civilian deaths are an unfortunate casualty of war. We do not purposely seek to kill civilians. If you think that we do that i truly feel sorry for how you feel about your country.
#18. Posted:
Miss
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 11,617
Reputation Power: 654
Glock- wrote
Miss wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi


You can't sit here and play the moral judge when Assad and ISIS don't even come close to the amount of civilians we have killed.

On topic, I highly doubt Russia will do anything about our planes, they didn't even do anything to Turkey when they shot down their plane.

It's just odd that only we can violate International Law. World would probably be a better place otherwise.
Civilian deaths are an unfortunate casualty of war. We do not purposely seek to kill civilians. If you think that we do that i truly feel sorry for how you feel about your country.


Germany in WW2? Hiroshima/Nagasaki? Vietnam? Bombing of Baghdad in the 03 invasion? Indiscriminately bombing popular cities doesn't sound like an "unfortunate casualty of war".
#19. Posted:
Protector
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 999
Reputation Power: 297
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 999
Reputation Power: 297
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
Aced wrote
Glock- wrote
We are supporting the Anti-Syrian government group currently.

Syria's Government is just as bad as ISIS. They use chemical weapons against civilians constantly. The President of Syria is as corrupt as they come, almost as bad as Muammar Gaddafi

Ah i see you have been brainwashed.Probably mainstream media. Syria has not and never will use chemical weapons. US of course blamed Assad... Without any proof yet again. Syria government is just as bad as isis? LMFAO where are you living you moron. Syria is fighting ISIS and other us terrorist groups "aka rebels" Please dont talk on matter that you have no actual information on except biased media.
Moron? You better watch your god damn mouth. Where do you get your information? I have been to Afghanistan and been shot at on a daily basis. So i am a bit more informed then you are.

Go and do research, Assad has used chemical weapons multiple times against civilians. CIVILIANS LIVING THERE even have said that the Syrian military used chemical weapons.
So before you go and start calling people morons, do research and find facts.


Afghanistan and Syria are 2 different things buddy. But in reality they have the same bases/causes invasions by Nato and its allies. Just because you have been to war does not mean you are more informed WHATSOEVER. Because Afghanistan and Syria are two different things.
Who told you syria used chemical weapons? Mainstream media. The same media that said their was "weapons of mass destruction in Iraq" while we helped saddam gas iran?
Where is the proof? NO ONE HAS PROVIDED ANY PROOF of Assad using chemical weapons, you are really just being tricked and fooled by mainstream media, its a shame. Why would Assad gas his own people and not terrorist? And the terrorist were advancing the day before on that territory why didn't Assad gas the terrorist then? Why would he gas his own people when he started gaining territory? The chemical attack was a false flag used as a pretext for war, but trump didn't invade he sent a strike. Please gain more knowledge on a subject before you try to comment with false information
I am very aware of that they are two different countries. And I am informed because I know people were currently in Syria training rebel forces. It has been proven that s it has been proven that assad has executed civilians for failing to leave the city. It's pretty damn clear that she has used chemical weapons against civilians it's pretty damn clear that he has used chemical weapons against civilians because the rebels have not used chemical weapons because they are not in possession of chemical weapons. You're making me start to believe that you're the type of person who still believes 9/11 was an inside job. Opinion and fact are two different things. Do you not remember that video that was posted online about five or six years ago of Syrian forces shooting and killing 20 people inside of a village. The two survivors were rescued and they were on CNN and FOX. The Syrian government is beyond corrupt. The Syrian government is almost as bad as the situation was in Libya.

Let me give you some information. I have been personally watching this conflict and searching information/reading doing my own research since the war started. Not on a daily bases, every now and then type thing. Because learning from other countries this same problem has occured in i was curious to find out what is going on. Are they really all that bad dictators? Or what is really going on here was my main concern of finding out. Now i am not saying Assad or Qaddafi are angels they arent no one perfect. But as far as Iraq goes and Libya if their leaders were still alive half of this shit wouldn't be happening, extremist wouldn't have gone this far. How many terrorist attacks were in Iraq when Saddam was in power? Now tell me how many terrorist attacks are happening in Iraq daily? Did we really go to Iraq and try to bring democracy and peace and to find WMD, that we still have not yet found. Yet we helped Iraq GAS iran... But we were worried about iraq having WMD?

Now to enlighten you on Syria. Its a proxy war with NATO and some other middle eastern countries all stirring the pot. Assad isn't a dictator. See with iraq and in the past we would invade countries right? By sending our troops on the ground. But now its different. Basically instead of sending our soliders to fight, the "globalist" "elites" whatever you wanna call them have a new strategy of taking over countries. They pay and train terrorist AKA "REBELS" to do the dirty work for them and so that by calling them rebels it makes USA/ALLIES look like the good guys and the public wont worry about funding them. Please look at syria before and after war. It was a secular democracy. All religions living in peace. The west stirred up anti Assad riots and basically caused the civil war. Then america decided to fund terrorist which they refer to as "rebels" but you do know half of the "rebels" are foreign right? they arent Syrian which prooves majority of the syrians love their president. But onto the fact those rebels came from other terrorist groups like Al Queada etc and called themselves 'FSA" so the public wont be worried. How did assad win his election in 2014 if he is a dictator?
Sorry but USA illegally attacked syria and continues to do so. All while providing no proof that Assad used chemical weapons.

To sum it up Assad is fighting against terrorist which the west refers to as "rebels"
If you still honestly think Assad is the bad guy, Pm and we can have a discussion instead of spamming this forum posting up.
On a side note please watch Bashar Al Assad's interviews and gain some knowledge. Lets not fall for the same trap as we did in Iraq,Afghan,Libya,etc
You're right Aced Btw being in the 'military' doesn't mean anything, I'm in the military myself. The US is in Syria illegally and they are with the kurd/rebel building illegal air base and downing the air force from that country that they are not even allow to be in thats just sad.The problem with the chemical attack is that they have 0 proof. Some people are watching too much CNN. English is not my primary language btw ;)
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.