You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#91. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 75
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 29, 201014Year Member
Posts: 75
Reputation Power: 3
The Chinese are the Smartest in the world and we are just the fattest..
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#92. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 790
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201014Year Member
Posts: 790
Reputation Power: 2
I dont think the world will "end" but i do believe something of large significance will happen
!
!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#93. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 876
Reputation Power: 42
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 25, 201014Year Member
Posts: 876
Reputation Power: 42
They did hit the moon with a rocket and found a watery substance on the moon. A rocket of that size wouldn't knock the moon out of orbit. If a black hole were to form at the Particle Accelerator it would be REALLY small. "In the future, the possibility of black hole production at the highest energy accelerators may arise if certain predictions of superstring theory are accurate. This and other exotic possibilities have led to public safety concerns that have been widely reported in connection with the LHC, which began operation in 2008. The various possible dangerous scenarios have been assessed as presenting "no conceivable danger" in the latest risk assessment produced by the LHC Safety Assessment Group. If they are produced, it is theoretically predicted that such small black holes should evaporate extremely quickly via Bekenstein-Hawking radiation, but which is as yet experimentally unconfirmed. If colliders can produce black holes, cosmic rays (and particularly ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, UHECRs) must have been producing them for eons, but they have yet to harm us. It has been argued that to conserve energy and momentum, any black holes created in a collision between an UHECR and local matter would necessarily be produced moving at relativistic speed with respect to the Earth, and should escape into space, as their accretion and growth rate should be very slow, while black holes produced in colliders (with components of equal mass) would have some chance of having a velocity less than Earth escape velocity, 11.2 km per sec, and would be liable to capture and subsequent growth. Yet even on such scenarios the collisions of UHECRs with white dwarfs and neutron stars would lead to their rapid destruction, but these bodies are observed to be common astronomical objects. Thus if stable micro black holes should be produced, they must grow far too slowly to cause any noticeable macroscopic effects within the natural lifetime of the solar system."
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.