Battlefield 3 Vs Modern Warfare 3 Gameplay Trailers Compared
4.5
With recent launch of the Modern Warfare 3 trailer much criticism is drawn with a comparison to Battlefield 3. The question has been repeatedly asked can the aging Call Of Duty game engine deliver the graphics gamers now deserve.
One comparison that can be lifted from the two is the scene of the building collapsing in an almost identical fashion. Attached is a video comparison to see whether the Frostbite 2.0 engine is as good as it seems. Watch the video and judge, judge who is copying who. Looks like there is a little too much in common with these trailers.
Look for yourself.
ClutchMasterDee COD is not good just wait after a month there will be lobbies and hacks. now play WaW there are modders in every game. next go to the first battle field and play. there are no mods at all. that is one reason COD sucks. and the next is you cant camp in battle field but you can in COD. battle field takes skill to level up and its harder to unlike cod. on black ops i can get over a prestige in one weekend thats how easy it is. go play B2. it is very much harder to level up
WaW was recently hacked due to that one update, so now they arnt doing anything about it.
you just proved my point right there. Battle field has no modders and it is older than WaW. you see how crappy it is now to play cod
i am definitly getting both, im a huge fan of both but to the battlefeild fanboys, stop bitching about how MW3 is going to get hacked and mods and shit, look at black ops. I havent been on in a while but last time i was on there where no wallhacks or mods or lobbys thats just bullshit because treyarch is always on the lookout, sso MW3 is going to be the same. the only reason COD4,WaW and maybe MW2 are fulled with hackers is because the companys dont give a shit about those games anymore and theres little monitoring and updates, so **** off with that lousy bullshit complaint
Well, my biggest problem with battlefield is the spawn time and time it takes to get to the actual enemies. Spawn killing may be less, but I'm the type of person who likes to be in the action in less than 3 secs after i died. With battlefield, theirs all this running you have to do and that just irritates the hell out of me. In MW2, even on fairly big maps i was put right into the action, i really didn't mind getting spawn killed (mainly because i did it more than it happened to me)
ClutchMasterDee COD is not good just wait after a month there will be lobbies and hacks. now play WaW there are modders in every game. next go to the first battle field and play. there are no mods at all. that is one reason COD sucks. and the next is you cant camp in battle field but you can in COD. battle field takes skill to level up and its harder to unlike cod. on black ops i can get over a prestige in one weekend thats how easy it is. go play B2. it is very much harder to level up
WaW was recently hacked due to that one update, so now they arnt doing anything about it.
if you were smart and actually wanted a fun realistic game, other than the same cartoony shit IW and treyarch always give, you would buy battlefield 3 because it is actually fun
"Battlefield 3 Vs Modern Warfare 3 Gameplay Trailers Compared" :: Login/Create an Account :: 53 comments