Modern Warfare 3 Focusing on Gun Skill in Multiplayer

4.5
A reduction of the number of so-called hotspots on the multiplayer maps of Modern Warfare 3 will alter and accelerate the flow of action in this fall's installment of the Call of Duty franchise juggernaut, one of the game's creators told Kotaku this week in New York City.

The makers of Modern Warfare 3's multiplayer mode are creating maps that include no more than five hotspots—places from which enemy players may be hiding or shooting—for a gamer to worry about at any one time.
"It simplifies it so that the less skilled player has less to think about," Robert Bowling, creative strategist at Modern Warfare development studio Infinity Ward told me yesterday. "What happens when you have more is that the professional guys are using that spot that is either difficult to get to. … There's fewer places to hide, which discourages the more camper mentality that seemed to emerge in the map design of Modern Warfare 2."

The multiplayer maps will also de-emphasize the verticality of combat that was introduced in Modern Warfare 2, Bowling said, offering that type of tiered conflict more selectively. A reliance on air support, also emphasized in the last Modern Warfare, will also be reduced, switching to something that will feel, Bowling believes, a little more like the first Modern Warfare, Call of Duty 4.

"Modern Warfare style is, for me, all about the high-speed, fast-paced—and I'm talking in terms of smooth controls and 60-frames-per-second framerate—infantry-focused combat," Bowling said. "And it's all focused on that gun-on-gun gameplay, especially in Modern Warfare 3. I feel like it's something we nailed with Call of Duty 4. We moved away from it a little bit with MW2, relying heavily on air support, killstreaks, perks and stuff like that. Modern Warfare 3, very much [is] building up from that Call of Duty 4 mentality of gun-on-gun, fast-paced infantry gameplay."



Posted:

Source: http://kotaku.com/5821230/modern-warfare-3-multiplayer-will-borrow-gun+on+gun-feel-of-call-of-duty-4-de+emphasize-verticality-of-mw2

Comments

"Modern Warfare 3 Focusing on Gun Skill in Multiplayer" :: Login/Create an Account :: 57 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

SolarisPosted:

Well we will just have to wait and see if what they say is a reality :)

jasonlee94Posted:

Why are people fighting over how long they've used the engine? Obviously the engine works since more people buy Call of Duty each year. Both games will be amazing regardless of what engine they use. Buy both. They both have great gameplay and both are great FPS's.

killer_B5000Posted:

Battlehammer
Ragnarock
Mr_Pikachuu
Lucozade
DrPhil321
Orangemohawk
Ambicidal
Mr_Pikachuu lmao why are you nerds fighting over how many years the same engine has been being used?? Point is, is that its been used too long...

CoD sucks **** and is being milked too much. Give me something new.

Battlefield 3 my friend.

^^^ this

^^^^ this

^^^^^ this


haha i wasnt going to post but after four people saying the same thing...haha dont worry guys, im already getting BF3.

lolz@kids pming me raging over cod sucking. :P


So in short, your viewpoint on everything is this, "If you don't like what I like you are wrong and stupid". I am getting both games and am looking forward to both, campaign and multiplayer. I am glad MW3 is getting a new engine as well.


It definitely is NOT getting a new engine. They are using the same engine that they've been using since 2005. With every new game they just tweak it a bit. Pure laziness. I don't understand why people defend Activision like it's their own momma, when it's painfully obvious that Activision doesn't care enough to put the time into making it a quality game. Oh, and before the trolls come running out of their caves, I will be getting this game because I actually enjoyed this campaign storyline. It doesn't change what I said about them being lazy though.

BattlehammerPosted:

Ragnarock
Mr_Pikachuu
Lucozade
DrPhil321
Orangemohawk
Ambicidal
Mr_Pikachuu lmao why are you nerds fighting over how many years the same engine has been being used?? Point is, is that its been used too long...

CoD sucks **** and is being milked too much. Give me something new.

Battlefield 3 my friend.

^^^ this

^^^^ this

^^^^^ this


haha i wasnt going to post but after four people saying the same thing...haha dont worry guys, im already getting BF3.

lolz@kids pming me raging over cod sucking. :P


So in short, your viewpoint on everything is this, "If you don't like what I like you are wrong and stupid". I am getting both games and am looking forward to both, campaign and multiplayer. I am glad MW3 is getting a new engine as well.


It definitely is NOT getting a new engine. They are using the same engine that they've been using since 2005. With every new game they just tweak it a bit. Pure laziness. I don't understand why people defend Activision like it's their own momma, when it's painfully obvious that Activision doesn't care enough to put the time into making it a quality game. Oh, and before the trolls come running out of their caves, I will be getting this game because I actually enjoyed this campaign storyline. It doesn't change what I said about them being lazy though.

marcusmonsoonPosted:

TTGMuted
-Icy-
milkxking
RaitoKunRyuk
SGTShaffer8 people need to STFU about quick scoping i hate kids who just quick scope and think there cool OMG OMG OMG I AIMED DOWN THE SIGHT REALLY REALLY FAST THEN SHOT OMFG OMFG IM **** AMAZING , **** quick scoping


We do it for a challenge. It takes no skill to sit in a corner aiming down your sights the whole game. So what if we spin off buildings? It takes some skill, and a lot of luck sometimes, but sitting in a corner aiming down your sights with an automatic weapon doesn't show you have skill OR balls.

And quickscoping HAS been confirmed. I just hope it isn't as easy as MW2. Every 12 year old with sleight of hand could do it.
It doesn't show you have balls by aiming down your sights? Its a fuc**ng video game dude.


+1

If you don't use a sniper in SnD these days, you're a "try-hard" or "bk". I'm sick of it. Let's go back to the old MW2.


No your just bad. Sniping takes more skill thats why you hate it, you hate it cause you cant do it.
Whoa, simmer down little Hitler. You make it sound like quick-scoping is a NECESSITY, otherwise you're ostracised for not trying hard; obtaining some "1337 tempah sh0t" which will be completely forgotten about the next game. Allow people to play the game HOW THEY LIKE instead of being some arrogant c*nt thinking that everyone should be the same.

Mr_PikachuuPosted:

Ragnarock
Mr_Pikachuu
Lucozade
DrPhil321
Orangemohawk
Ambicidal
Mr_Pikachuu lmao why are you nerds fighting over how many years the same engine has been being used?? Point is, is that its been used too long...

CoD sucks **** and is being milked too much. Give me something new.

Battlefield 3 my friend.

^^^ this

^^^^ this

^^^^^ this


haha i wasnt going to post but after four people saying the same thing...haha dont worry guys, im already getting BF3.

lolz@kids pming me raging over cod sucking. :P


So in short, your viewpoint on everything is this, "If you don't like what I like you are wrong and stupid". I am getting both games and am looking forward to both, campaign and multiplayer. I am glad MW3 is getting a new engine as well.


how did you manage to get that out of anything i said lawlz

TTGMutedPosted:

-Icy-
milkxking
RaitoKunRyuk
SGTShaffer8 people need to STFU about quick scoping i hate kids who just quick scope and think there cool OMG OMG OMG I AIMED DOWN THE SIGHT REALLY REALLY FAST THEN SHOT OMFG OMFG IM **** AMAZING , **** quick scoping


We do it for a challenge. It takes no skill to sit in a corner aiming down your sights the whole game. So what if we spin off buildings? It takes some skill, and a lot of luck sometimes, but sitting in a corner aiming down your sights with an automatic weapon doesn't show you have skill OR balls.

And quickscoping HAS been confirmed. I just hope it isn't as easy as MW2. Every 12 year old with sleight of hand could do it.
It doesn't show you have balls by aiming down your sights? Its a fuc**ng video game dude.


+1

If you don't use a sniper in SnD these days, you're a "try-hard" or "bk". I'm sick of it. Let's go back to the old MW2.


No your just bad. Sniping takes more skill thats why you hate it, you hate it cause you cant do it.

-Fleshyy-Posted:

So what if its the same engine they upgrade it anyways and so what if BF3 gets a new one it still wont be better than MW3 all the slow paced warfare from BF3 is trash its more easily compared to Halo Cod takes way more gun skill and if your gonna call me a fan boy go ahead idc i am a cod fan boy 200% but if you go on here talking S H I T about Mw3 then your just another BF fan boy but MW3 will sell more than bf3 because people like it [like me]who cares that 12 yr olds get it for Christmas more noobs to pwn besides theirs young kids who play bf too

Mr_PikachuuPosted:

Lucozade
DrPhil321
Orangemohawk
Ambicidal
Mr_Pikachuu lmao why are you nerds fighting over how many years the same engine has been being used?? Point is, is that its been used too long...

CoD sucks **** and is being milked too much. Give me something new.

Battlefield 3 my friend.

^^^ this

^^^^ this

^^^^^ this


haha i wasnt going to post but after four people saying the same thing...haha dont worry guys, im already getting BF3.

lolz@kids pming me raging over cod sucking. :P

DrPhil321Posted:

Orangemohawk
Ambicidal
Mr_Pikachuu lmao why are you nerds fighting over how many years the same engine has been being used?? Point is, is that its been used too long...

CoD sucks **** and is being milked too much. Give me something new.

Battlefield 3 my friend.

^^^ this

^^^^ this