elfyyevo

fwong42 you do know fps dont make a difference, the human eye cant tell a difference between 30 fps and 60 fps btw battlefields fps runs at a constant 30 while CoDs fps drops to 30 and 20 when the player shoots and aims and sprints. etc

well then you need glasses because i can easily see the difference

UniqueFx Sequel?, I thought it was suppose to be a Prequel.

Mercurial1 bf3 is so bad of e game i h8 it so much it slow pace. i get de game of de mw3 because i hav skill n u dunt u suk.

fwong42 you do know fps dont make a difference, the human eye cant tell a difference between 30 fps and 60 fps btw battlefields fps runs at a constant 30 while CoDs fps drops to 30 and 20 when the player shoots and aims and sprints. etc

Duck90

ExpectTheWorst

sF-Jordz

krwskater25

jayjay92895

krwskater25 Oooo.... 60 FPS.... That don't mean crap if you have a junk host

theres a big diff betweeen 60 fps and 30 fps just saying not ttrying to start a big flame war

Ok tell me what the diff is.

30 frames per second is the difference you ****, seriously how old are you 10?

YOU'RE clearly the one who is "10" here. Now read this very carefully because you're about to be proven 100% wrong and everyone here who says "DURR MW3 GONNA BE BETTER CUZ WE HAVE 30 MORE FPS~~" will also be in the same boat as you.

To give an idea of what 30 FPS as opposed to 60 FPS means, consider this: Movies you see at the theater are 24 FPS, which is the most common industry standard for film. Humans generally cannot easily detecte differences in excess of 30 FPS. 30 FPS will do just fine for Battlefield 3, as it would for MW3 if it was also running at 30 FPS.

WANT MORE? What it comes down to, and this is what many console players (Including you, derp) and even members of the press (The absolute GENIUSES at IW) fail to understand, is that the decision to make the game run at 30 FPS and 720p is because to do otherwise would come at extreme expense to the quality of the graphics and even gameplay. Console hardware, both PS3 and 360 alike, is very outdated by now. Battlefield 3 is a truly next-generation first-person shooter, and its unparalleled graphical and technological capabilities require PC hardware to be fully realized, which is half a decade more advanced and powerful than console hardware. Even at 30 FPS and 720p, BF3 pushes console graphics and technology to the absolute visual limit of the console hardwares ability WITHOUT risking damage to the gameplay. It is impressive that the only gameplay compromise that DICE was forced to make for the console versions of BF3 is dropping the player limit from 64 to 24 players.

MW3, on the other hand, is running the same engine they've been running since CoD4 (Just revamped) trolololololol

so how cool to you feel at the fact that youve spent the last few months looking up ways to show that bf3 is gonna be better then mw3? congrats you know how to use google. and saying things like derp and trolololol are a lil old dont you think kid? grow up. there games. and who cares about the pc, only reason people use them is to hack. so now before you go calling anyone a troll look at what you posted... good job, again i give you congrats that you know how to use google... now honestly, for your sake and everyone elses... stfu

TauntzE

ExpectTheWorst

sF-Jordz

krwskater25

jayjay92895

krwskater25 Oooo.... 60 FPS.... That don't mean crap if you have a junk host

theres a big diff betweeen 60 fps and 30 fps just saying not ttrying to start a big flame war

Ok tell me what the diff is.

30 frames per second is the difference you ****, seriously how old are you 10?

YOU'RE clearly the one who is "10" here. Now read this very carefully because you're about to be proven 100% wrong and everyone here who says "DURR MW3 GONNA BE BETTER CUZ WE HAVE 30 MORE FPS~~" will also be in the same boat as you.

To give an idea of what 30 FPS as opposed to 60 FPS means, consider this: Movies you see at the theater are 24 FPS, which is the most common industry standard for film. Humans generally cannot easily detecte differences in excess of 30 FPS. 30 FPS will do just fine for Battlefield 3, as it would for MW3 if it was also running at 30 FPS.

WANT MORE? What it comes down to, and this is what many console players (Including you, derp) and even members of the press (The absolute GENIUSES at IW) fail to understand, is that the decision to make the game run at 30 FPS and 720p is because to do otherwise would come at extreme expense to the quality of the graphics and even gameplay. Console hardware, both PS3 and 360 alike, is very outdated by now. Battlefield 3 is a truly next-generation first-person shooter, and its unparalleled graphical and technological capabilities require PC hardware to be fully realized, which is half a decade more advanced and powerful than console hardware. Even at 30 FPS and 720p, BF3 pushes console graphics and technology to the absolute visual limit of the console hardwares ability WITHOUT risking damage to the gameplay. It is impressive that the only gameplay compromise that DICE was forced to make for the console versions of BF3 is dropping the player limit from 64 to 24 players.

MW3, on the other hand, is running the same engine they've been running since CoD4 (Just revamped) trolololololol

Well said, but you just proved yourself as fanboy #1

Most people on here are going to be playing on console anyways so bringing up PC is going to be superior is pointless because it has and always will be. Graphics doesn't mean much either, it may look pretty but the gameplay is what matters, which we won't find out until BOTH the games come out. So cool your gym shorts and have some patience.